Three returns power No. 9 Buckeyes, 31-13

Preview | Box Score | Recap

Printable View

Return to Original
  • Print

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP)—Three plays will torment Wisconsin coach Bret Bielema for another year.

Kurt Coleman and Jermale Hines returned interceptions for touchdowns and Ray Small brought a kickoff back 96 yards on Saturday to lead the ninth-ranked Buckeyes to a 31-13 win, despite getting badly outgained by the self-destructive Badgers.

“I hate losing to these guys,” Bielema said. “Absolutely, it’s something I can’t stand for whatever reason. The bottom line is I have to do it again. It’s something we’ll continue to look at until we have another opportunity next year.”

Wisconsin outgained Ohio State by nearly 200 yards, and had 22 first downs to the Buckeyes’ eight. None of it mattered in the end.

“It was obviously a different type of football game,” Ohio State coach Jim Tressel said. “When you get two defensive touchdowns and then a kickoff return touchdown, that’s more than you could ever wish for. Those three moments were critical.”

Coleman, playing his first game since a Big Ten-mandated suspension for a late hit, was the only person near Scott Tolzien’s pass in the first quarter and returned it 89 yards.

“It was just an easy pick for me,” Coleman said. “I just was standing right there, happened to be in the right spot and my team led me all the way down the field. I did the easy part. They did all the work.”

After Wisconsin (5-1, 2-1 Big Ten) made it 14-10 early in the third quarter, the Buckeyes (5-1, 3-0) padded their lead when Hines tipped a pass, pulled it in and followed a glut of blockers on a 32-yard return.

The Badgers countered with a field goal, but Small brought back the next kickoff.

Wisconsin had won on its last two trips to Ohio Stadium. But the Badgers’ mistakes led to their undoing this time.

They dominated the statistics, leading in first downs 22-8 and total offense 368-184, but the three big returns spelled the difference.

Tolzien, intercepted just three times on 125 attempts in Wisconsin’s first five games, completed 27 of 45 passes for 250 yards but threw the two costly picks. Sacked just twice all year, the Buckeyes managed it six times and harassed him all day.

“There were some times when he was under amazing duress and he still delivered the ball,” Tressel said while praising his defense. “There were also some times when he didn’t have a chance.”

The Buckeyes and quarterback Terrelle Pryor didn’t have the ball much and didn’t have to do much with it when they did.

Wisconsin dominated time of possession 42:47 to 17:13. The Buckeyes had the ball for less than 2 minutes in the third quarter alone, yet outscored the Badgers 14-3.

Pryor, who finished 5 of 13 passing for 87 yards with one interception, looked completely confused by Wisconsin’s defense—at least until late in the half.

He was picked off by linebacker Culmer St. Jean, who returned it 13 yards to the Buckeyes 12. Four plays later, holder Chris Maragos took the snap on a fake field goal and ran around left end, stretching the ball out with his right arm to touch the pylon for a 9-yard score that tied it at 7 midway through the second quarter.

The Buckeyes had just 36 yards of total offense on their first five possessions until Pryor found his footing late in the second quarter with Wisconsin on top 10-7. He hit half of his six passes in a quick 88-yard race against the clock, capped by a 32-yard scoring pass to DeVier Posey with 40 seconds left.

That was it for the offense. But the interception return by Hines and Small’s kickoff return virtually ended the suspense.

“We always say if you can do something special in the special teams and win the turnover margin, you’re going to have a chance to win a tough game,” Tressel said.

Updated Oct 10, 8:23 pm EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

Head to Head - Week 6

Team Total Yds Pass Yds Rush Yds First Downs 3rdD% Pen./Yds Turnovers Time of Poss.
Wisconsin 368 250 118 22 31.6% 7/60 2 42:47
Ohio State 184 87 97 8 27.3% 5/35 1 17:13

267 Comments

  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    steve k Sat Nov 14, 2009 09:55 pm PST Report Abuse
    wtg crushing mich
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Patrick Wed Oct 14, 2009 02:38 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Yes, that is why they are the 'lil 11 and the MAC serves as their readily available "beat-up" conference. Why do you think Marshall and UCF left; they had higher aspirations them being punching bags like the rest of the MAC.

    So Indiana, Northwestern, Purdue, Minnesota and Illinois do not provide enough "tune-up" in conference? You have to schedule patsies like Toledo and New Mexico State in addition?
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    csurf1962 Tue Oct 13, 2009 09:04 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Patrick,
    The entire Big 10 does it, not just OSU. Generally, these games are played before the conf. games start, but obviously some are played after. Look at the Big 10 schedules and you will see. So don't single out OSU when the whole conf. does the same thing.

    The better schools need a few "tuneups" during the season.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Patrick Tue Oct 13, 2009 03:54 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Terry, er... 1962, So if the WAC sucks then you are confirming that OSU schedules inferior out of conference opponents? I know, trying to stay within the 'lil 11 paradigm.

    So you still have copies of the video and postage to spare? i thought you would be out of both after sending them to all the OSU boosters, demanding payment
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    CoryM Tue Oct 13, 2009 06:24 am PDT Report Abuse
    Udahman,
    On November 3, 2007 Wisconsin came to the Horseshoe. They lost that game 38-17 (Benie ran all over them). That was the last time Wisconsin came to the shoe. How can the last TWO trips be wins for Wisconsin when the last time they visited they lost?
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    csurf1962 Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:39 am PDT Report Abuse
    Patrick @ # 261,
    News flash for you: The WAC sucks and so does Boise State. Their # 5 ranking is bullsh!t. Playing a schedule of doormats from that Division 2 conference.
    OSU 2002 National Champions!! 14-0 Perfect Season. Double digit point underdog. Beat Miami in 2OT.

    Give me your name & address and I'll send you a copy of that game for you to enjoy again.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Patrick Mon Oct 12, 2009 06:54 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Jinz,

    "Sat, Dec 5 New Mexico State

    yep thats a hard schedule"

    New Mexico State is on that "Tough" Out of Conference OSU Schedule, (at C'bus, of course, Oct 31st)

    So if Boise beats NMSU by more points than OSU, how is OSU better?
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Dan Mon Oct 12, 2009 05:06 pm PDT Report Abuse
    hey udahman, you're from milwaukee so I understand your ignorance.

    Vikings are dominating. Accept it and move on.

    btw 30-23. Favre in your eye. Learn to love it.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    __A_YAHOO_USER__ Mon Oct 12, 2009 04:46 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Dan G, the Vikes will get their due justice...they're definitely beatable! Just wait...even if the Super Bowl is their destiny this year...they're predictable...they'll loose yet again and get no rings
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    __A_YAHOO_USER__ Mon Oct 12, 2009 04:43 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Hey Cory M/249...check your stats man...the last TWO trips to the Horsehoe have been WON by the Badgers! You smokin' something illegal or just plain stupid!?
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Greg Mon Oct 12, 2009 03:15 pm PDT Report Abuse
    #252
    Nothing dominating about it - except for the score.

    ...
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    spanky Mon Oct 12, 2009 01:18 pm PDT Report Abuse
    To matt K:

    Learn to read a box score. one intereception was deep in OSU territory, the other was a 32 yd return. So lets think this through...that would mean that WI had it on what? Their own 32! There we go, way to think that one out.

    As for all you other morons, time of possession and offensive yardage was dominated by WI for sure. BUT why was that? Because OSU defense and special teams kept OSU's offense off the field for what would have led to 3 offensive drives for the home team. That is the sole reason for the lop-sided box score. Just looking for more reasons to bash a team who is in the top 10 year after year. So they are in a droughy of winning big games, at least they arent loosing to unranked teams, horrible conference opponents and at least they are making to to bowl games after the new year rings in unlike other teams.

    Just think things through before you start bashing a quality team. Does OSU deserve to be in the top 5...not yet, but only time will tell.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    jinzhoyy Mon Oct 12, 2009 01:05 pm PDT Report Abuse
    @253

    more ivy league than your @#$%y no name school like boise state

    and for the record, heres your record:

    Thu, Sep 3 (16) Oregon W 19-8 --
    Sat, Sep 12 Miami (OH) W 48-0 --
    Fri, Sep 18 at Fresno State W 51-34 --
    Sat, Sep 26 at Bowling Green W 49-14 --
    Sat, Oct 3 California-Davis W 34-16 --
    Wed, Oct 14 at Tulsa 8:00 pm --
    Sat, Oct 24 at Hawaii 11:05 pm --
    Sat, Oct 31 San Jose State 3:00 pm --
    Fri, Nov 6 at Louisiana Tech 8:00 pm --
    Sat, Nov 14 Idaho 3:00 pm --
    Fri, Nov 20 at Utah State 9:30 pm --
    Fri, Nov 27 Nevada TBA --
    Sat, Dec 5 New Mexico State

    yep thats a hard schedule
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Patrick Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:23 pm PDT Report Abuse
    "The Canes didn't deserve to win."

    Glad to see Ref Terry Porter is keeping active in retirement and still repeats his reasoning as to the flag. csurf 1962, nice moniker Terry

    RW, more like Wal-Mart or K Mart

    Dana, OSU people will always point to some Ag program to show they are the best. Trouble is, even though it is the largest school in the country, it can't crack the Top 50, nor even the top 20% of universities in the country. Their admit rate is about 60% or maybe even higher this year.

    Some guy on another board mentioned how great the poultry program was at OSU. OK, I will admit it, OSU is great in Chicken_ _ _ _
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Dana Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:10 am PDT Report Abuse
    #126- You really think OSU is an Ivy League caliber school??? Yeah, right. You reload with felons, criminals and thugs. Your alumni even funds it while the sweatervest looks the other way. BTW Boise State is undefeated and ranked higher than you are. Take that to the bank.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Ben Mon Oct 12, 2009 09:08 am PDT Report Abuse
    @230: The OSU defense allowed a mediocre offense to gain over 350 yards. Only a fool would call that a dominating performance. The OSU defense had a good day overall, but there was nothing dominating about it.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Tim Mon Oct 12, 2009 08:05 am PDT Report Abuse
    Actually TOP doesn't matter at all if you don't win. bottom line. they didn't win the game. YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME!! you don't play to win TOP
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    RW Mon Oct 12, 2009 06:59 am PDT Report Abuse
    Why do SO many front runners cheer for OSU that aren't from Columbus and didn't go to OSU???? These people go to Target, buy an OSU shirt, then watch every game until they lose......When is the last time OSU had a real schedule or beat a top ten ranked team?? Unless you went to OSU, or are from Columbus you're a fake!
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    CoryM Mon Oct 12, 2009 06:38 am PDT Report Abuse
    The last time the Badgers were in the horseshoe (November, 2007), they lost. Anybody else catch this? He wrote that they won in his preview too.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    matt Mon Oct 12, 2009 04:32 am PDT Report Abuse
    anyone who is anyone would look at those stats the only return that was remarkable was the kick return. Both interceptions were deeeeeeeep in osu territory meaning WI marched the ball all the way down. And yeah TOP matters when it is that big of desparity.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    SIN Sun Oct 11, 2009 09:35 pm PDT Report Abuse
    "If it ain't broke don't fix it".. Well the Offense IS broke and needs a major overhaul. The offense is embarrasing. ESPN and the internet sport sites all keep mentioning how bad OSU's offense is and how they need to fix it quick before we get to the stronger teams.
    You are delusional if you think Pryor is the answer at QB.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    csurf1962 Sun Oct 11, 2009 09:32 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Dan G,
    Congrats. I think it's great. I hope you stay unbeaten because that means you will be due to lose one. Maybe Nov.1 in GB???? Healthy offensive line for the Pack by then.

    Have to go watch Twins rewind.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    SIN Sun Oct 11, 2009 09:29 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Time of possession. Why did Wisconsin have so much more...because the Ohio State offense is so bad they can not stay on the field. Move Pryor to another position and get a real QB. Our Defense can't win them for us every week. The Offense needs to be able to eat the clock and score on its own.
    As of now it is incapable of doing it. Ohio State will do ok in the Big Ten, but they will get destroyed in a bowl game against a real team. The defense will be worn out from being on the field so long.
    BENCH PRYOR!!!! We need a real QB.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    csurf1962 Sun Oct 11, 2009 09:28 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Patrick @ # 241,
    Miami was a double digit favorite in that game.
    OSU faced a 4th & 14 on that drive and made the 1st down. A stop by Miami & the
    game was over.
    Miami had a possesion AFTER the Bucs took the lead in the 2nd OT & couldn't score.
    Stop crying about a bad call. The Canes didn't deserve to win.The Bucs were the
    better team that night.

    Have some. It's tastes great.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Cute Kitty 71 Sun Oct 11, 2009 09:26 pm PDT Report Abuse
    wow this is pitaful how you guys see low numbers for stats and all a sudden our offence sucks if you look at the time we had the ball its only for about 18 minutes last time i checked theres 15 minutes in a quarter hello we had the ball for about what a 1 1/5 quarters and we got 190 yds and 8 first downs lets say we have the ball for the usual time which is usually about double that if we matched that supposably horrable performance we would have what 380yds and 16 first downs looks like a good game to me and another thing that bothers me we are 5-1 #7 in the ncaa what are you cryin about and did i mention we lost the only flippin game to USC by 3 points and for those of you sayin that pryor needs to be a passing QB get the hell over it thats like tellin a weight lifter that specializez in deadweight to only benchpress,or like telling a goaly in a soccer game dont block it with your hands only use you legs id be fine with him averaging 180yds passing when he can get 60-100yds rushing to go along with it get over your selves it it aint broke dont fix it and i think 3 points from being undefeted and still in the hunt for a championship is not close to being broke at all...

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.

No upset!

93%
of College Pick’em users chose Ohio St. to win the game

Did the Yahoo! Sports Experts make the right picks?

Top Performers

 Top Performers
 Wisconsin
C. Maragos C. Maragos, DB
1 Rush, 9 yds, 1 TD
 Ohio St.
D. Posey D. Posey, WR
2 Rec, 54 yds
1 TD

Conference Scoreboard

NCAAF - Week 6