No. 6 Hokies sloppy in 34-26 win against Duke

Preview | Box Score | Recap
  • Print

DURHAM, N.C. (AP)—With No. 6 Virginia Tech not at its best, Tyrod Taylor needed to be. He certainly was.

Taylor threw for a career-high 327 yards with two long touchdown passes to help the sometimes-sloppy Hokies dodge a letdown and beat Duke 34-26 Saturday.

Taylor was 17 for 22 with TD tosses of 36 yards to Danny Coale and 28 yards to Jarrett Boykin, and Josh Oglesby had two late touchdown runs once the rushing game opened up for Virginia Tech (4-1, 2-0 Atlantic Coast Conference).

“I know we have a lot of talent on the offensive side of the ball,” Taylor said. “It’s just my job to get the ball to them.”

Playing one week after dominating then-No. 9 Miami, the Hokies were nowhere near that crisp this time. But they were good enough to claim their ninth straight victory against Duke.

“I don’t think that’s the old Duke football team,” Tech coach Frank Beamer said.

Thaddeus Lewis was 22 for 40 for 359 yards with two touchdown passes, including a 4-yarder to Austin Kelly with 25 seconds left. But Lewis said the pesky Blue Devils (2-3, 0-1) too often settled for field goals, with Will Snyderline kicking four, including a 43-yarder that pulled the Blue Devils to 27-19 with 7 minutes left.

“We needed to get seven points, and we didn’t do that,” Lewis said. “But three points is better than no points.”

The Blue Devils, 17-point underdogs, kept this one tight throughout, but were denied their first win over a top-10 opponent in two decades. Before last year’s 14-3 loss in Blacksburg, Duke hadn’t come within 24 points of the Hokies since they joined the ACC in 2004.

“We got close enough in the fourth quarter to go beat a great team,” Duke coach David Cutcliffe said. “Once you taste that, you like it. I wouldn’t say we spit it out—it wasn’t a choke—but we just didn’t finish.”

Indeed, Tech spent much of this one looking ripe for an upset after routing the Hurricanes 31-7 to vault back into the top 10. By halftime, the Hokies had matched their season highs with seven penalties for 55 yards, and they finished with 12 flags for 105 yards.

“Too many penalties and too many long plays,” Beamer said. “We weren’t as sharp as we would like, but I don’t think it was lack of effort. Part of it was Duke, and part of it was us. … Sometimes I think you’ve just got to win some games that’s not real pretty on the road, and this is probably one of those.”

Ryan Williams, the nation’s No. 6 rusher, was held to 83 yards on the ground, 40 fewer than his average. But he had 41 yards and a pair of third-down conversions during the drive that ended when Oglesby’s 12-yard touchdown run made it 27-16 with 9 1/2 minutes left. Oglesby added a 19-yard score 7 minutes later that made it 34-19.

For much of the way, Duke keyed on stopping the ground game, and Taylor took advantage.

“When we needed to run the football, and we did, and got points, that was critical to this ball game,” Beamer said. “They were going to take the run away, so you’ve got to be able to throw the ball.”

Taylor led the Hokies to 17 points in a 9-minute stretch of the first half, then made just enough plays down the stretch to preserve their early lead. He directed three straight scoring drives to help the Hokies rally from an early 7-0 deficit, countering Duke’s first touchdown pass with his touchdown to Coale.

Then, one series after Matt Waldron’s 40-yard field goal put Tech ahead to stay, Taylor put the Hokies up 17-7 with his scoring pass to Boykin—who wrestled Duke’s Leon Wright for the ball and came down with it near the sideline in the end zone.

Later, Taylor connected with Boykin for 64 yards on third-and-34 to keep alive a drive that ended with a 33-yard field goal by Waldron to put Tech up 20-13.

“He told me, ‘Just get the ball down the field, and if the guy makes an interception, you tell your wide receiver to make the tackle,”’ Taylor said. “Jarrett kept the play alive, he went down there and I found him down the field and he made a great catch.”

Taylor went on to surpass his previous best of 287 yards set two years ago in his first college start against Ohio.

Duke’s only lead came late in the first quarter when Lewis faked a handoff and hit wide-open Brandon King in stride down the left side for a 48-yard score. Snyderwine added field goals of 29, 25 and 47 yards for Duke.

Updated Oct 3, 4:54 pm EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

Head to Head - Week 5

Team Total Yds Pass Yds Rush Yds First Downs 3rdD% Pen./Yds Turnovers Time of Poss.
Virginia Tech 477 327 150 21 66.7% 12/105 1 29:25
Duke 397 359 38 17 36.8% 7/44 0 30:35

54 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Jeff
    54. Posted by Jeff Mon Oct 5 7:41pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    ACC vs. SEC I was at the VT/Alabama Game and I can tell you there were some bad calls and inproper ball spotting by the SEC Officials. I had 6 tickets on the 45 yard line and one of my guests is an Alabama Fan who wore Alabama Gear to the game. He agrees with my assessment on the bad ball spotting and uncalled holding all night by the Alabama Line. As far as Tennessee is concerned I think they are afraid to play VT. Yes I am a VT fan and I say to the scoffers, no one remembers 2nd place or the loser of a game. VT is improving and finding ways to win each game even if they have to come back to do it. That is a dangerous team if you ask me. VT will win the ACC Championship again for the 3rd straight year and I predict could possibly re-play Alabama for the National Championship. I was there at the VT/ Alabama game and even their fans were saying they were just glad to have the win. The game I assure you was closer than the score. There is still a lot of football to be played but the ACC is getting stronger and could win it all this year. GO HOKIES
  2. Nobody Cares What You Think
    53. Posted by Nobody Cares What You Think Mon Oct 5 2:43pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    MO, I agree with you the ACC thats what they do, eleminate each other. It shows teams with bad records, but when you really look at it, the ACC generally evenly matched, someone has to lose.

    JB, I agree with you, does VT desrve to be ranked No. 5, not in my opinion. 10th yes. Heres the thing against NB, you got to control the ball. Did NB do that, obviously not. VT has generally ranked in the top 3 in defense for a good while, along with thier special teams. You have to control offense, defense and special teams. Just look into the pros, as dominate as New England is, thier special teams have won a 1/4 of thier games in the last 6-7 years. You must control the team in it's entireity, for 60 minuets. It only take a few seconds to score. Did NB deserve to win, probably, did they, no. So in reality, it does not matter who deserved to win that game. NB made too many mistakes. Now on the other side of that coin so did VT. You also cant throw two interceptions and expect to win either. Nebraska did.
  3. Mo
    52. Posted by Mo Mon Oct 5 12:07am EDT

    Report Abuse

    ACC has wins over Nebraska, Oklahoma, BYU, and Stanford (first place team in the PAC 10). They've had a decent non-conference performance against ranked teams, but have stunk it up against lesser teams. It looks like the ACC will repeat last year when they all beat up on each other. It is very unusual to have such parity in a college football conference. Out here in Big 12 country Houston has been a big surprise with their wins over our teams, and then the Cougars get blown out in their own conference. But this season has a LONG way to go. A lot can happen between now and December.
    A college football fan in Kansas City
  4. JB
    51. Posted by JB Sun Oct 4 11:03pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Just posted this on lead for OU Mia, Seems appropriate;

    To bad about Bradford, comes back to play, has lost all his receivers, no line to block, no continuity on offense.
    Will lose millions on decision, maybe he can throw the ball to himself.
    Regardless, how the hell is VT at #5, I watched Bama play their worst game of the yr and destroy them, I think
    VT had 100 yds on the day. I watched Neb kick the [profane] out of them all game just to lose in a fluke play.
    If your wondering whos overrated, look no further. They've got no one left except a POS GT team. I'm on
    BYU all the way. If someones going to slip in, they deserve it a hell of alot more than VT.
  5. The Truth
    50. Posted by The Truth Sun Oct 4 9:09pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Sorry guys we have some incredible ignorant ass monkeys on the board that are hung up on something as simple as NOMENCLATURE. I guarantee that not a single won of them (Casie, Michael H) even knows what the word nomenclature means. LOL. There entire diatribe is based on the fact that the SEC has won more national championships, bowl games, everyday wins. etc, yet they entirely discount the following (1) SEC was establsihed in 1933 decades before many conferences even were establsihed (2) SEC has had more teams in their conference than many other conferences (ie. PAC 10 only has 10 teams and the ACC has had 8-10 teams until a few years ago. Every single one of the stats that Casie brings up is predicated on these two stats. Let's face it, if the SEC changed names to the ass-pounding conference is 1980 and the douchebag patrol in 1996 than everyone of there stats would be "voided" in their mind. these guys have actually clained that the SEC has dominated each and every decade. That is what they said. I have presented the facts below and they continue to refute them with some garbage that makes no sense. I have given the SEC that they have been very competative if not the best overall conference in the last few years. But the 70s, 80s, and 90s is no comparison. Here are the facts as presented
    Decade of 1990s - FACTS
    1) Big 12 had more national champioships than SEC (4-3). Is this not a fact?
    2) ACC had 3 NC in the 90s and SEC had 3 NC in the 90s.
    3) ACC had 3 runner-ups in the 90s giving the advantage to the ACC obviously.

    Decade of 1980s - FACTS
    1) Big East won 3 titles (now an ACC team) - Miami dominated the 80s as did Penn State
    2) Big Ten had 2 titles
    3) ACC / Mountain West / Big 12, Independants / SEC all had only 1 title (with GA coming in 1980). Are these not facts. SEC's only NC came in 1980.
    Obviously the 80s were owned by Penn State and Miami. Do you not agree? If you were alive then and actually watched football you knew that Miami and Penn State owned the 1980s.

    Decade of the 1970s
    1) Big 12 - won 4 titles (2 were shared but one year it was shared between two Big 12 teams)
    2) PAC 10 - won 3 titles (2 were shared)
    3) SEC - won 3 titles (2 were shared)
    4) Independants won two titles (1 was shared)
    5) Big East won 1 title
  6. Big Super Winner
    49. Posted by Big Super Winner Sun Oct 4 4:23pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    the SEC is a cute conference, but obviously threatened by the amount of talent and power coming out of the ACC. Old beliefs eventually collapse. Notre Dame is now a joke, as is Michigan. Nebraska fell from grace a few years ago.

    The SEC will fall next. Soon when people say "SEC" others will say "the who?... The Federal Election Commission? Is that what you said?"
  7. <i>dave27692003</i>
    48. Posted by dave27692003 Sun Oct 4 3:40pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I don't know about the SEC ACC debate , frankly I couldn't care less I am a VT fan and don't give a rat's #%*& about the rest of the ACC . I just care about winning games wheher it's 77-0 or 34-26 or 3-2 a win is a win . Sorry Miami had to play in the rain or Nebraska had to get beat on a fluke play ( I guess Doug Fluties hail mary and Cal's band plays should go down as just flukes) but as long as we win so what . The ACC SEC thing is garbage let's just see how the rest of the season plays out .
  8. Casie C
    47. Posted by Casie C Sun Oct 4 1:05pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    va tech beating duke and miami beating oklahoma(with 1/2) of oklahoma's offense out, is like winning a national title for those guys!!!!!!!

    SEC owns the acc
  9. Casie C
    46. Posted by Casie C Sun Oct 4 1:03pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    truth: miami was in the big east, and OFFICAILY those titles stay with the big east. the acc has 5 titles ALL time and only 1 in the last 16 years. and yes miami was dominant in the 80's- early 2000's...........but they were not very good ever befor that and haven.t been since
  10. Trent
    45. Posted by Trent Sun Oct 4 11:48am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I REPEAT but it looks like The Lies wants to ignore the facts.

    Are you delusional or just stupid? The ACC has 4 national championships sence 1980. 1981 Clemson went 12-0, 1990 saw a split national championship between Georgia Tech(UPI) 11-0-1and Colorado(everybody else). In 1993 Florida St 12-1, and in 1999 Florida St 12-0.

    The same time period has the SEC with 8. 1980 Georgia 12-0, 1992 Alabama 13-0, 1996 Florida 12-1, 1998 Tennessee 13-0, 2003 LSU 13-, 2006 Florida 13-1, 2007 LSU 12-2, 2008 Florida 13-1.

    That is unless you are co-oping the 5 National Championships that Miami has won. Three when they were independent and two when they were with the Big East.

    Or if you want to go back to 1936 it's still the SEC 17 championships to 5 for the ACC

    Too far? Let's just do it sence the BCS, oops it's still the SEC, 5 championships to the ACC's 1

    if you want me to enlighten you anymore just let me know.

    So who doesn't know history and trying to ignore facts?
  11. michael h
    44. Posted by michael h Sun Oct 4 11:17am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Truth - 43 - Who owned the strech before 86 and after 2002? And who won in the years where you indicate " runner up". Nobody cares and in most cases could not tell you who the runner up was. To me, if you are a "runner up", you don't own anything! By my count some other conference won in 7-8 (50%) of those years where you claimed that the ACC owned that 16 year span. And guess what, 4-5 of those NC during that time frame were won by an SEC team. Good try "Botton Feeder."
  12. Juash
    43. Posted by Juash Sun Oct 4 10:06am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Speaking of the SEC and ACC, I wonder why Virginia Tech and Tennessee NEVER play each other? The last time they played each other was in a bowl game in 1994? WTF? They are only like a 3 hour drive from each other and this could start a huge rivalry between SEC and ACC foes. I, for one, would love to see this. No one ever seems to mentions it.

    VT vs UT = big money, prime time game every freaking year? Lots of money for both schools? Both fan bases are huge in their respective parts of the country. It's a win/win for both programs.
  13. The Truth
    42. Posted by The Truth Sun Oct 4 10:00am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Juli - that was 1986 - 2001. I stand correct, current ACC teams in or won the NC game in 14 of 16 years...LOL.

    Also - Didn't Florida State win the NC in 1999? Yes they did. When did FL. State join the ACC? It was in 1991. (check the link below douchebag). Nice stats Juli - what a baffoon.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference

    Tell me SEC fans, who has owned the 16 year stretch between the mid-80s and early 2000's????

    1986 - Miami - runner-up
    1987 - Miami - NC
    1988 - Miami - runner up
    1989 - Miami - NC
    1990 - GT (tied for NC with Colorado despite fact GT had no losses and 1 tie and Colorado had a loss & tie)
    1991 - Miami - (tied for NC with Washington - both were undefeated)
    1992 - FSU - runner up to Bama (last time Bama won a NC - LOL)
    1993 - FSU - NC
    1994 - Miami - runner-up to Nebraska
    1995 - Nebraska - NC (beat Florida 62-24...LOL)
    1996 - FSU - runner up to Florida (hey SEC is in another NC game...LOL)
    1997 - Nebraska - NC
    1998 - FSU runner up to TN
    1999 - FSU - NC
    2000 - Miami runner-up to Oklahoma
    2001 - Miami - NC
  14. MorrisD
    41. Posted by MorrisD Sun Oct 4 9:55am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Dear RayGU, I wasn't boosting ACC football. I was merely trying to subtly suggest that posters who go apocalyptic after every single game are perhaps over-reacting. I was also trying to send the message that posters tend to overwork the descriptor "suck" in these posts. Since my post, albeit facetiously, clearly stated only the Mountain West and WAC conferences were worth following this season, I'm thinking maybe you didn't read my entire post, short though it was.

    As for all the posters comparing conferences over decades, these are fascinating and show some real research skills, but it's thinking like this that results in polls that reflect history more than the present at times. I'm thinking specifically of last week when U of South Carolina beat Ole Miss and remained unranked, while Ole Miss stayed in the Top Twenty.

    And for all you writers who can express themselves in this forum without cursing about past misadventures, I salute you.

    A college football fan in Kansas City
  15. The Truth
    40. Posted by The Truth Sun Oct 4 9:36am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Juli - What a sad sack you are. I look at the ACC as a collection of 12 teams. Some of these teams have come from other conferences to make the ACC a 12 school conference. Obviously someone with limited intelligence is still probably smart enough to realize it's hard to compare what a 12 team conference has accomplished with what a conference with less than 12 teams. I assume, when you compare the SEC against the PAC-10 for example, you are multiplying all PAC-10 stats by 1.2 in order for it to be an apples to apples comparison?? So back to your comment about the ACC and no titles in 16 years. Is it not a fact that between 1886 - 2002, the conference that either (a) won the national championship (b) was in the national championship game is a current member of the ACC. Yes that is 14 out of 17 years. When has the SEC, or any conference for that matter, been involved in 14 of 17 straight national championships. LOL, in fact no other conference has come close. As I have mentioned before, the SEC stats are completely skewed because (a) they have been around longer than any other conference (b) have remained relatively intact in terms of tschool make-up (c) and have had 12 teams in the conference longer than most other conferences, especially the ACC. Juli is too ignorant to recognize these FACTS. 14 of 17 years meatsleave. Suck on that awhile
  16. Dr. Samuel Lee
    39. Posted by Dr. Samuel Lee Sun Oct 4 9:15am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hokie Nation this was a excellent game. Duke played hard, smart, and never gave away anything. Our Boyzzz learned much AND this was a great 'tune up' for next week's Boston College game. This game could not have been better in so many ways. The score, the offensive production, and the way key weaknesses in the defense were highlighted by Duke which Coach Foster can correct this week.

    Not every week will be as against the strong Miami Team which just beat Oklahoma. Having a tough one this week with a "W" should mean the Boyzzz will be even more mentally prepared against a very determined and strengthening Boston College.

    WONDERFUL! GOOOOOOOOO HOOOOKIES.
  17. Big Super Winner
    38. Posted by Big Super Winner Sun Oct 4 9:07am EDT

    Report Abuse

    But seriously SEC fans, just because Florida has beaten a bunch of junior colleges and teams no one has heard of - don't get over-confident about their rank and the strength of the SEC.
  18. Big Super Winner
    37. Posted by Big Super Winner Sun Oct 4 9:03am EDT

    Report Abuse

    SEC vs ACC? WTF. Why are SEC fans so threatened by the ACC? Both conferences have elite teams. Good for the SEC for having history. Woohoo. We should all be rallying against the notion that great teams and conferences are determined by their history. Let's look at now.

    The SEC has 2 solid teams and a bunch of worthless teams. The ACC, has maybe 1.5 solid teams and a bunch of struggling teams. Like it or not, these conferences can easily be compared. They are not far apart in terms of talent and performance.

    But as members of the same geographic region we should all be more annoyed that the Big 12 and Big 10 are way overrated every year. Texas has played no one and is ranked #2. That annoys me.

    To you insecure SEC fans - you should be happy that the ACC is up and coming. It makes your region look better. And given that there are so many cross-over conf games between the two conferences, it is good for the SEC that the ACC gets better every year.
  19. <i>johnclick2003</i>
    36. Posted by johnclick2003 Sun Oct 4 8:29am EDT

    Report Abuse

    ifs and butts are candy and nuts. vt was playing in the same rain as miami. vt was just jacked up and miami was reading their headlines.duke is better, vt was reading their headlines. vt leading alabama in 4th quarter so to say they got handled all game is inaccurate. acc is better this year.sec good but little overrated and this is coming from UK sec guy. florida and alabama are very good but acc top half talented enuff to beat rest of sec.stop the biased hate reason why good teams get blown out and upsets happen is b cause they are COLLEGE KIDS!
  20. Army of Darkness
    35. Posted by Army of Darkness Sun Oct 4 3:12am EDT

    Report Abuse

    #33, Juli, I couldn't have put that any better myself.

    Can we please get a PLAYOFF to stop all of this non-sense talk about mythical national championships? Very rarely do we have a team that is obviously better than everyone else ('95 Huskers), so it's time for the big six commissioners to step down and the NCAA to step up and take charge of this ridiculous popularity contest. This is getting ridiculous.
  21. Juli
    34. Posted by Juli Sun Oct 4 3:07am EDT

    Report Abuse

    In the past 16 years the ACC has one football national title. In the past ten years the ACC has won zero football national titles while the Big 12, Pac 10 and SEC have won multiple titles. I think anyone trying to include the ACC in the same conversation as other major football conferences in terms of tradition is really reaching. Geeze, prior to FSU and Miami joining the ACC Soccer and Lacrosse were bigger sports..............and I am only embellishing slightly here. When you look back prior to FSU, VA Tech, and Miami joining the conference, the ACC was a joke in football, they were not even considered a major conference, the WAC was taken more seriously in those days than the ACC.
  22. Ryan
    33. Posted by Ryan Sun Oct 4 2:59am EDT

    Report Abuse

    you fools who think that the acc even compares to the sec need to wake the hell up Florida and Alabama would beat every single acc team by more than three touchdowns so wake up and stop thinking the acc is any good your best team is virgina tech they lost to an sec team so enough with the stupid remarks
  23. Juli
    32. Posted by Juli Sun Oct 4 2:55am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Some of these posts are hillarious. I see a post saying Va Tech got lucky against Miami because it was raining and if it was not raining the Canes would have won, are you serious, so Miami can only play when it is not raining.

    I see another post saying Miami got lucky because OU did not have Sam Bradford, holly cow are you serious. OU was a top 5 team at the beginning of the season because of how great their offensive line is and their defense is. In 1994, one of the greatest college QBs of all time Tommie Frazier went down with an injury. In came a kid nobody ever heard of, the late Brook Berringer and the Huskers kept winning including dominating an 11-1 No. 2 Colorado team that had the Heisman Trophy winner on their team. When Brook Berringer went down with a collapsed lung Nebraska had to use a 3rd string QB and they beat the No. 16 team in the country. Nebraska had so many injured QBs that they had to take a guy who was a wide receiver I believe and activate him as their 4th string QB. Against Oklahoma State that year, Neb only lead 9-3 at halftime with an injured Brook Berringer playing. 3rd string QB Matt Turman was put in for the 2nd half and the Huskers outscored OK State 23-0.

    Great teams find a way to win, if your team was ranked No.4 because of one single player then your team probably was not a top 4 team to begin with. Miami won, they beat a very good team and OU should have won with or without Bradford.

    The other ridiciulous argument I see on here is about the ACC. First off stop saying Miami won national titles and counting those as ACC national titles. Miami has never won a title as a member of the ACC. The ACC has won four football national titles in the past 60 years. Miami never won a title as a member of the ACC conference. The ACC has won one title in the past 16 years. VA Tech is supposed to be the best team in the ACC and was handled pretty well by Bama and by Nebraska (but escaped with an incredibly lucky play). Now, as the media loves to do, Miami will get pumped up and I'm sure rise to No. 2 in the polls this week. Miami beat a very, very mediocre FSU team that is now 2-3 and they beat a Ga. Tech team that is winning games in less than impressive fashion.

    I think the ACC has some solid talent, good teams etc. but anyone who wants to include them in a conversation as one of the top conferences in college football history is really dillusional. Nebraska alone has won more titles in the past 5 years than the ACC has combined. Do you realize that from 1953-1991 the ACC won one football title, they were not even considered a major football conference until FSU joined the conference 16 years ago. I think some ACC fans have short memories.
  24. Trent
    31. Posted by Trent Sun Oct 4 2:54am EDT

    Report Abuse

    rick z are you delusional or just stupid? The ACC has 4 national championships sence 1980. 1981 Clemson went 12-0, 1990 saw a split national championship between Georgia Tech(UPI) 11-0-1and Colorado(everybody else). In 1993 Florida St 12-1, and in 1999 Florida St 12-0.

    The same time period has the SEC with 8. 1980 Georgia 12-0, 1992 Alabama 13-0, 1996 Florida 12-1, 1998 Tennessee 13-0, 2003 LSU 13-, 2006 Florida 13-1, 2007 LSU 12-2, 2008 Florida 13-1.

    That is unless you are co-oping the 5 National Championships that Miami has won. Three when they were independent and two when they were with the Big East.

    Or if you want to go back to 1936 it's still the SEC 17 championships to 5 for the ACC

    Too far? Let's just do it sence the BCS, oops it's still the SEC, 5 championships to the ACC's 1

    if you want me to enlighten you anymore just let me know.

    So who doesn't know history and trying to ignore facts?
  25. cledus
    30. Posted by cledus Sun Oct 4 2:03am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yeah and Florida just won the title last year, you guys act like the wife with selective memory, if you're going to bring up the past, bring up the whole past. SEC is the best, and don't forget that, or you ACC fans can just dwell on your regular season wins from last year. Y'all do the same thing with basketball, bring up the past of you guys winning. UK all the way, and the only fans that can say anything to us is UCLA.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

No upset!

99%
of College Pick’em users chose Virginia Tech to win the game

Did the Yahoo! Sports Experts make the right picks?

Top Performers

 Top Performers
 Virginia Tech
T. Taylor T. Taylor, QB
17-22, 327 yds
2 TDs
 Duke
T. Lewis T. Lewis, QB
22-40, 359 yds
2 TDs

Conference Scoreboard

NCAAF - Week 5