BLACKSBURG, Va. (AP)—With pressure coming and Virginia Tech desperate, Tyrod Taylor’s eyes worked quickly from the left side of the field to the right, just fast enough.
The Hokies quarterback found Danny Coale running all alone down the left sideline and hit him for an 80-yard completion, setting up Taylor’s 11-yard touchdown pass to Dyrell Roberts three plays later and rescuing the 13th-ranked Hokies against No. 19 Nebraska for a 16-15 win Saturday.
“Once I saw that he was open, I just had to let it go,” said Taylor, who was hit just after he released the ball.
Coale hauled it in cleanly, but was forced out of bounds at the 3 with 1:11 left.
“That’s kind of what you play for, moments like that,” he said.
But Taylor wasn’t finished. Not by a long shot.
After being sacked on the first play from the 3 for an 8-yard loss and then rushed into throwing the ball away, Taylor scrambled around for what the school said was nine seconds before rifling the ball to Roberts on the right side of the end zone with 21 seconds left.
“I redeemed myself,” said Roberts, who had dropped a third-down pass earlier.
“Every kid that plays football dreams of a game like this,” he added.
Especially when you come out on top.
“That’s the game,” cornerback Rashad Carmichael said. “Sometimes you’ve got to pull something out of some body part.”
Carmichael was on the bench listening to defensive coordinator Bud Foster talk about how the Hokies were going to score when he saw the ball floating toward Coale only feet away.
“Great ball. Great catch,” he said.
And a great win for the Hokies (2-1), who had struggled all day against the Nebraska defense, managing just 195 yards in the first three quarters and only one real scoring drive.
Their touchdown came on the game’s opening series, a 24-yard drive set up by Roberts’ 76-yard return of the opening kickoff, and their second-quarter field goal came after a 58-yard drive on which Ryan Williams accounted for almost all of it with runs of 46 and six yards.
In the third quarter, they gained one yard while the Cornhuskers, behind the running of Roy Helu Jr. and quarterback Zac Lee’s heady play, controlled the ball—and the outcome.
After the fourth, they were left thinking about missed opportunities, like the five drives that stalled in Hokies territory, all leading to field goals by Alex Henery, and one drive that should have, but didn’t.
Leading 12-10, Nebraska had a first-and-goal at the 6 after Lee ran for 17 yards on third-and-3. Two holding calls, two false starts and an incomplete pass later, Nebraska faced second-and-goal from the 36 and later wound up punting it away—into the end zone.
“We didn’t have penalties the entire game until that series,” wide receiver Niles Paul said. “It came at a point where we really needed the points. That hurt us.”
Coach Bo Pelini thought it could have been the turning point.
“If we scored there, I though we were in pretty good shape,” he said.
The Cornhuskers (2-1) fell to 1-21 in their last 22 games against teams in the top 20, and Virginia Tech extended to 32 its string of nonconference home wins.
For much of the game, it seems like both trends would be bucked.
Helu ran for 169 yards, almost all of it after the Cornhuskers were held to zero yards in the first quarter, and Lee finished 11 for 30 for 136 yards, but his completions all seemed critical.
They just never got Nebraska into the end zone.
“Our defense gave us the ball a lot and put us in the position to score a lot of points,” Paul said. “We left a lot of points out there on the field. … It’s really frustrating when your defense is playing the way they were.”
Virginia Tech’s Ryan Williams finished with 107 yards and a 1-yard touchdown run after Roberts’ big early return, but gained only 13 yards on six carries after halftime.
Taylor, known more for his running than passing, continued to frustrate Hokies fans with his apparent unwillingness to run. He lost 22 yards on nine carries, repeatedly passing up space in the open field when flushed from the pocket.
He did that on the winning touchdown, too.
Head to Head - Week 3
| Team | Total Yds | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | First Downs | 3rdD% | Pen./Yds | Turnovers | Time of Poss. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska | 343 | 136 | 207 | 18 | 35.3% | 9/60 | 2 | 29:46 |
| Virginia Tech | 278 | 192 | 86 | 11 | 44.4% | 7/53 | 0 | 30:14 |

151 Comments
1 - 25 of 151
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Yes, the Huskers should have blown this game wide open they dominated from start to finish but it sadly came down to one blown play, it happens.
It is funny everyone talks about Husker fans "crying", let me tell you, I live in Virginia and the way Hokie fans are talking on Monday you would have thought they just rolled all over Nebraska.
I think anyone who watched that game knows the Huskers outplayed them all game long, but the really more than anything else made mental mistakes that cost them the game.
As I was walking out of the stadium about four Hokie fans came up to me and said "the better team did not win that game". These were really classy folks and they recognized that plain and simple Va Tech won the game on a prayer, it happens, it will happen again, no big deal. What I think is fantastic is that on a national stage the game showed Nebraska belongs back among the top 20 teams. It has been a while since we have seen the kind of intensity that defense showed on Saturday.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
-- All Nebraska fans
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Take a good look, you only really see them in the early art of the season, but even now one this clueless is truly rare.
Report Abuse
I do have to disagree about Miam, as much as I would love to see VT beat Miami I honestly think, after watching both teams, the Hokies are going get an ole fashion stomping.
I am so proud of how well the Huskers played and how they never quit, they showed that they are a step closer back to where we expect the Huskers to be. Their youth showed and they made some really youthful mistakes, and Pelini made some calls he probably would like to have back but I am proud of them.
For all the Husker baiters, go post somewhere else. I have been to many college football games and I have to tell you that this past weekend, bar none was the best Husker away game experience I have ever been too. The mutual respect these two classy programs have for each other is something really to behold. The Hokie fans were just absolutely incredible, we did not run into a single knucklehead, every Hokie fan was gracious to us and everyone admired to tradition and history of the Huskers, it was really cool.
We drove from Wash D.C. and the drive was gorgeous going down Rte 81, it is worth it, I recommend to anyone to go and catch a game in Blacksburg if you ever get the chance, a must do for a college football fan.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Gee, that seems like some pretty objective voting.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Miami be ready for next week, Lane Stadium is a tough place to play!
Go Hokies!
Report Abuse
It breaks my heart that the Huskers lost on a play because someone was sleeping on the receiver. But that being said they had so many opportunities. Zac Lee had so many open receivers and just was not hitting them, or would throw the ball way too late. He had one guy wide open down the feild for what should have been a TD but Lee threw it so far off that the guy had to catch it falling out of bounds. The four penalties in a row is just unbelievable to me, we lost 3 points there perhaps 7.
But I think the worst call of the day was when it was 4th and 1 on the last drive the Huskers should have gone for it. As someone watching from the stands the push the offensive line was getting was incredible in the 2nd half, they were pushing VT all over the place why Pelini did not go for it is beyond me. I think that one play is the one that stands out for me, in spite of all the missed opportunities this one just seemed like a not brainer to me and they should have gone for it.
Report Abuse
The rule interpretation change was that a player catching a pass and then falling to the ground (whether in bounds or out of bounds, whether in the field of play or end zone) must control the ball through the fall and after contact with the ground. So whereas the old adage is still true that "the ground cannot cause a fumble" the new rule interpretation means that the ground can cause a pass to be incomplete instead of complete. If you watch the replays of that play, the receiver lost the ball when he hit the ground and at that point the refs made the proper incomplete call given the new rule. It is NOT the first time that Neb or VT has been helped or hurt by the new rule interpretation - as the VT offense was hurt by it a few times last year...
The way the VT offense had looked in the 2nd half prior to that last drive (the first word that comes to mind is "pitiful"), Bo would have been skinned alive by the NU faithful if he had gone on 4th down and not made it. The smarts move, which he shouldn't have to be second guessed on by those angered in the hindsight of the loss, was certainly to punt. Given the year after year ranking of the VT defense as being among the best in the country the odds of the VT defense stopping a 4th down try were far higher than that of the VT offense going 80+ yards in less than 2 minutes. Bo made the best decision given the percentages, it just didn't work out that time.
As for the officiating, there was a lot of offensive holding on both sides that was being allowed to happen (without flags) with only some of the most obvious being called (and the VT DE Worrlds was tackled a few times without flags), and there were several blocks in the back (mostly on Neb punt returns) that were not called either. If there was any bias, it certainly wasn't toward VT (and given the refs were from the Big 12 conference, as they seem to be every time a Big 12 conference team plays an ACC team, that shouldn't be a surprise). So far this year VT has played against Alabama at a so-called neutral site in Atlanta with SEC refs, and NU at home with Big 12 refs...
VT won the first 5 minutes of the game, had one good run in the 2nd quarter, and won the last 2 minutes through QB improvisation - and that was enough to win the game against a NU team that played well otherwise...
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
and we paid for it.I hope we can learn from this game and not make the same ones next time.
It's along was to the end the season. We have to prove how good we are.I can't see were we have
anything to complain about.
Report Abuse
and we paid for it.I hope we can learn from this game and not make the same ones next time.
It's along was to the end the season. We have to prove how good we are.I can't see were we have
anything to complain about.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The ground can't cause fumbles, true. BUT it can prevent you from obtaining possession. The ball was thrown to him and he caught the ball, BUT to be considered having possession of the ball you need to control the ball through hitting the ground...
I do agree that they should have at least reviewed it, but I don't think it would have changed their stance on the play.
Hope that helps.
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 151