(10) Oregon (7-1) at Stanford (5-3)

Mostly Cloudy Currently: Stanford, CA
Temp: 61° F
  • Game info: 3:30 pm EST Sat Nov 7, 2009
Preview | Box Score | Recap
  • Print

Despite rumors to the contrary, Oregon coach Chip Kelly isn’t ready to reinstate suspended running back LeGarrette Blount this week.

Thanks to the play of freshman LaMichael James, the seventh-ranked Ducks haven’t missed Blount this season and they are leading the Pac-10 race going into Saturday’s game at Stanford.

After rushing for 1,038 yards and 17 touchdowns last season, Blount was expected to be one of the top playmakers for Oregon (7-1, 5-0) before being suspended for punching Boise State defensive end Byron Hout following a season-opening loss.

Kelly allowed Blount to practice with the team and said he could return if he met certain conditions. The Oregon coach targeted the Stanford game as a possible end to his suspension, and that speculation was further fueled by a visit from Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott following last Saturday’s 47-20 win over then-No. 4 Southern California.

Kelly, however, didn’t say Monday if Blount would return.

“When we have an announcement, we’ll make it,” he said.

James has capably replaced Blount as the top tailback, rushing for 918 yards this season to rank third in the Pac-10. The Ducks rank eighth nationally with 233.3 rushing yards per game.

“Each week, he keeps getting better and better. That’s an exciting thing for us,” Kelly said. “It’s really helped spur our offense to have him back there. “

Last week, James ran for a career-high 183 and his seventh touchdown as Oregon piled up 613 yards on the Trojans, who entered with the nation’s 16th-best defense. Jeremiah Masoli threw for 222 yards and a touchdown, and he ran for a season-best 164 yards and another score.

“I don’t know if we made a statement,” said Masoli, who leads the conference’s top-scoring offense (35.6 points per game). “This is just what we planned on doing. If it makes a statement it makes a statement. That’s just Oregon football and how we roll.”

The win moved the Ducks up to No. 8 in the BCS standings, highest among the nation’s one-loss teams, and pushed them 1 1/2 games ahead of second-place Arizona in the Pac-10. They haven’t won a conference title since 2001.

That cause would be helped with an eighth straight victory over the Cardinal (5-3, 4-2) and fourth in a row in Palo Alto. Blount’s 3-yard run with six seconds left sealed last season’s 35-28 home victory.

For this year’s matchup, though, Stanford is coming off a bye and appears to be much improved behind the duo of Toby Gerhart and Andrew Luck.

Gerhart, the conference’s leading rusher, had 125 yards and a touchdown Oct. 24 as the Cardinal snapped a two-game slide with a 33-14 win over visiting Arizona State.

That performance not only left him six yards shy of becoming the second Stanford rusher with consecutive 1,000-yard seasons, but also 143 short of matching last season’s school-record 1,136. The senior’s 13 TDs are two shy of his 2008 total.

However, he has been held to 76 yards on 24 carries in two meetings with Oregon.

The difference in this game could be Luck, the Pac-10’s top-rated passer (148.5). The freshman has thrown for 1,825 yards and is second in the conference in total offense behind Washington’s Jake Locker.

Luck has thrown nine touchdowns and been intercepted three times for the conference’s second-best offense (435.25 yards per game). He will face a defense that ranks in the top two in the Pac-10 in both points (17.1) and yards (300.9) allowed.

“Andrew Luck has been leading our team,” coach Jim Harbaugh said. “He’s doing the things a veteran quarterback would do.”

Harbaugh’s team is looking to become bowl eligible for the first time since 2001 by staying unbeaten at home. Stanford is 4-0 in Palo Alto this season and has won nine of 10 there.

Oregon has won back-to-back road games and now tries to win three straight for just the second time in four years.

Updated Nov 3, 7:27 pm EST
digg del.icio.us
more

285 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Truth
    285. Posted by Truth Tue Nov 10 9:09pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Oregon did not bring back Blount because they lost to stanford, they would have brought him back for the stanford game to win it. . Does anyone do any thinking before a post here? Stanford played the best game of the Harbaugh regime and Andrew Luck had the best game of his collegiate life. My hat is off to them.
  2. WAWebfootInMichigan
    284. Posted by WAWebfootInMichigan Tue Nov 10 6:00pm EST

    Report Abuse

    The loss honestly was not a huge surprise to realistic Duck fans. I posted a few weeks ago (after Cal) that it was unrealistic to think in terms of Oregon running the table but they would definitely be in the hunt. I always saw Stanford as being a tough game especially being on the road.

    Now everyone can put all the NC game behind us and focus on the REAL prize...getting off the Rose Bowl schneid. The last few weeks of the season in the PAC are going to be the most entertaining on the country...who needs a conference championship game?
  3. EDawg
    283. Posted by EDawg Tue Nov 10 4:43pm EST

    Report Abuse

    In 1984 BYU beat a 6-5 Michigan team to win the National Championship. This is probably the most unworthy crowing of a Champion in the history of the NCAA. In 1984 Florida would have beaten BYU like a pro team (which they were) against a school for the handicapped! Oregon loosing to Stanford has to sting the Oregon faithful prett much. Wow, what an upset and way to be exposed. They are now out of the hunt and can only hope for a PAC-10 title!
  4. <i>kammeres</i>
    282. Posted by kammeres Tue Nov 10 9:46am EST

    Report Abuse

    Someone posted on the Blount reinstatement thread that the timing of the reinstatement was a ploy to draw attention away from Oregon's leaky defense against Stanford. Sounded funny at first, but the guy is actually pretty perceptive. Ducks need to work on that, especially against UA and OSU. They manage to win out, they still go to the Rose Bowl. USC wins out, Pac-10 could have two teams in the BCS top 10 or at least top 12. Conference is still wide open.

    poster David Foubert, good point. If Florida was in the Pac-10 you wouldn't catch them with schedule fodder at the beginning of the season, or with one last "tune-up" game late in the year (FIU). Their SOS would be even better as a result. Naysayers will haul out the schedule-made-years-in-advance argument, but, come on, how many people realistically thought Charleston Southern or FIU would be anywhere close to powerhouse status six years ago?
  5. David Foubert
    281. Posted by David Foubert Tue Nov 10 1:59am EST

    Report Abuse

    Wow honeslty some of you need to get a life, Pac 10 is the toghest conference hands down. Probably the reason it is so hard to go undefeted. You cant say oregon is over rated standford played one hell of a game and really took it to the ducks defense. I would love to see Florida in the pac 10 or some of the other big names schools with cracker jack divisions and schedules. Gosh and what is these boise state noise that team is the biggest joke in all of college football, them and there smurf turf. Omg boise state is undefeted, the schools they paly are even a bigger joke then them. Pac 10 is where the real football is played, bcs sucks where is the playoffs????
  6. Dawgmeat
    278. Posted by Dawgmeat Mon Nov 9 11:29am EST

    Report Abuse

    Tim ...... didnt even cross my mind. funny thing is ..... i was talking a LOAD more sh*t when Oregon was winning than i am now that they lost. probably because all the dumbasses who were taking my posts seriously have gone into the FBIs witness protection program ..... and will never be heard from again. take this Duke moron for example .... this guy made about 500 posts a week when Oregon was winning ..... he has not made a single post since the Stanford game .... not one. pathetic, Washington has won three games all year long ..... im right here ..... i love my Dawgs and i will support my Dawgs always.

    as for the game ..... happens all the time. Pac 10 teams keep Pac 10 teams from winning the national championship. if Pac 10 teams could just play out of conference opponents all season long ..... theyd get into some far more impressive bowl games.
  7. Dawgmeat
    277. Posted by Dawgmeat Mon Nov 9 11:23am EST

    Report Abuse

    exactly Horse ..... Washington (who was #2), Florida (who was #3), Oklahoma (who was #4) ..... or any other team in the top ten wouldve wiped their asses with BYU in 1984. Utah played a schedule that was ten times more difficult last year than what BYU played in 84, and they got left out in the cold ..... even though, just like BYU in 84, Utah was the only undefeated team. hell ...... last years Utah team wouldve wiped their ass with the 84 BYU team.
  8. WAWebfootInMichigan
    276. Posted by WAWebfootInMichigan Mon Nov 9 8:38am EST

    Report Abuse

    Dawgmeat-

    Had a friend in from WA this and we went to Chicago all weekend, so haven't had a chance to read or post. As I said earlier, the Stanford game had me nervous, and rightfully so it turns out. Bottom line is that they need to learn to win outside of Autzen if they want to get to that "elite" category.

    I will catch up on the raspberries, but wanted to check in let those know I can still show up to take my lumps as well as dish them out.
  9. Horse M
    275. Posted by Horse M Mon Nov 9 3:00am EST

    Report Abuse

    Dawg is absolutely right. Only BYU fans are dumb enough to truly believe that the 1984 title was real, it's a f'ing MYTH.

    Anyone who knows anything about football knows that the top 15 teams in the country could have defeated BYU that year. It was pathetic that they were given the title.
  10. Dawgmeat
    274. Posted by Dawgmeat Sun Nov 8 11:53pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Michael ..... WRONG. do your homework next time .... Washington was 11-1 in 1984 and #2 in the country. 1984 was the biggest joke in the history of the national championship. BYU beat absolutely NOBODY in 1984 ..... NOBODY. their BEST victory was 6-6 Michigan in the Holiday Bowl (i should know, i was at the game) ..... and they needed a late 4th quarter TD drive just to win that game. Washingtons only loss was on the road to Pac 10 champion USC (i should know, i was at that game also) .... and they soundly beat #2 Oklahoma in the Orange Bowl. BYU winning the national championship in 84 was a joke.
  11. Dana
    273. Posted by Dana Sun Nov 8 11:01pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Damn it feels good to be back in the AP top 25!!!!! I hope we can beat CAL and USC. I am just thrilled about this last win. A great school with real academic standards that also excels on the field. I am proud to be an alumni.
  12. Michael M
    272. Posted by Michael M Sun Nov 8 10:50pm EST

    Report Abuse

    How old are you, Ezekiel? The last time a WAC team won the National Championship was 1984, when Brigham Young won it. BYU was the only unbeaten team and all the other big boys had at least 2 losses. BYU beat an average Michigan team in the Holiday Bowl (which was the WAC's bowl at the time). Another WAC team, Arizona State should have won it in 1975 - they were unbeaten and beat Nebraska in the Fiesta Bowl. They gave it to 1-loss Oklahoma and ASU finished second.

    Of course, that was a different WAC. ASU and Arizona bolted and joined the Pac 10 later on. Most of the legacy WAC teams dropped out a few years ago and formed the Mountain West Conference. The WAC today does not even remotely look like the old WAC (except for Hawaii).
  13. Ezekiel
    271. Posted by Ezekiel Sun Nov 8 10:18pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I sincerely hope the Boise State plays for the national championship and get so thoroughly stomped that it is the last time in my lifetime that a WAC team is ever considered in the same tier as the SEC Big-12 or Pac-10. A blue gimmicky field is perfect for a team that fattens its record on the likes of UC Davis and Louisiana Tech. If Boise State fans did not have such an inferiority complex then they would not be checking in every Oregon game to comment on a just barely victory against the Ducks where both teams looked as awful as Hout's face vs. Blount's fist. Duck fans accept the loss no excuses the fact is we lost to an over-rated sorry team. And their is no excuse for that monumental embarrassment. Any given Saturday. . .
  14. <i>hesterbuddy</i>
    270. Posted by hesterbuddy Sun Nov 8 9:23pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Well Well Well...... The last time I looked at some of these post it wass all about how good The Ducks are. I even heard the excuse of Boise wearing Blue and playing on a blue field as the reason to why they beat Oregon. I have heard it all...
    Now it has gone to trying to figure out how many BCS games they have played and won or lost....

    You duck fans have got to get your heads out of the Ducks Butt !

    Look, Boise beat the Ducks and thats that.. They just beat you... Live with it and move on..

    Yes, The Ducks since that beating had turned it around and was playing some very good ball. However, As I have always said, ANY TEAM CAN BEAT ANY TEAM ON ANY DAY ON ANY FIELD...

    How many undeafted seasons does the Ducks have ? I am just wondering...
    Where are the Ducks ranked now ?
    Hmmmm ? was Stanford ranked ? Surely the Ducks did not lose to a Powderpuff team ?

    The last thing I want to say is that you Duck fans said it did not matter if Boise beat ya'll in the opener. That the later games really determine the type of team you have. Well lets see, How games has the Ducks lost ?
    Now how many games has the Broncos lost ? Oh thats right we have not lost any !
    The Broncos will let the record speak for its self....

    0 - Lost VS 2 - Lost... Broncos ranked higher than Ducks, we beat you ...... End of subject...
  15. Dawgmeat
    269. Posted by Dawgmeat Sun Nov 8 8:46pm EST

    Report Abuse

    blur ..... you need to learn how to read. i said they are 3-17 against BCS conference teams NOT NAMED Oregon or Oklahoma. their 3 wins are 2 against Oregon St and 1 against juggernaut Iowa St. they also did not "lose" to Washington St ..... as you so kindly put it ..... they have lost ALL FOUR TIMES they played Washington St ..... add that to the ass kicking Washington handed them in 2007 ..... and Boise St is 0-5 against the state of Washington.
  16. Jeff P
    268. Posted by Jeff P Sun Nov 8 7:53pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Hey Ducks fans!! How did that Tope 10 for 6 days feel?? Talk about CHOKE and over rated - NO BCS NO TITLE game - just RAIN RAIN RAIN .... what is that I hear ...crickets? And Blount the thug ... hahahaha what a joke - the Ducks are THE Chokers - can we get a petition going for an official name change? Year after year ...zzzzzzz no wonder there are sooo many suicides in the Northworst region...

    Go Trojans!! Rose Bowl Bound (again) sooo many records of winning Pac 10's and BCS bowls there are not enought characters in the field to record them all - FIGHT ON!!

    Lay some wood on Stanford this Saturday !!
  17. <i>herboverstreet_com</i>
    267. Posted by herboverstreet_com Sun Nov 8 7:35pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Saw the game on TV, never did see if Blunt made his way back onto the field. Anybody know his status?
  18. BIONICDUCK
    266. Posted by BIONICDUCK Sun Nov 8 7:34pm EST

    Report Abuse

    more proof than polsters are on some serious crack....USA Today has Ohio st. ahead of USC and USC and Utah ahead of Oregon.....I'm thinking if Purdue lost to Oregon they should be ahead of Oregon but behind Ohio st. because they beat them. The polls are run by complete phuking idiots. P.S. Good game Cards if you missed my post after the game.....we might of caught you if the game was 5 quarters but your RB really is a beast
  19. Ezekiel
    265. Posted by Ezekiel Sun Nov 8 7:09pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Whose gonna call big mouth Hout as it is obvious that he plays for a coach who doesn't like to discipline? It would be poetic justice if Boise State played Florida and Hout popped of to Spikes and ended the game with one eye.
  20. Ths Boss
    264. Posted by Ths Boss Sun Nov 8 6:44pm EST

    Report Abuse

    They ordered Duck soup in Stanford, the same as they did in Boise.

    Did Blount make his return at Stanford since the Boise State game?

    Don't worry Blount, Al Davis should call ya.
  21. Michael H
    263. Posted by Michael H Sun Nov 8 6:44pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Congratulations to Stanford on playing an amazing game, that offense was an unstoppable machine. Go Ducks, win out and we're still in the Rose Bowl! Let's not let Arizona head to Pasadena! Mike Stoops is a douche nozzle and Arizona has inefficient land use policies.
  22. Ezekiel
    262. Posted by Ezekiel Sun Nov 8 6:12pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Oregon fan since 83. Dawg you are true purple old school Husky fan with a hatred for the Ducks that come from the era of Husky dominance and occasional Duck upsets. I agree with your brutal assessment of the Phil Knight era Duck fans and some of the oversized egos and expectations of the Ducks. I remember 7 years ago listening to some Duck fan calling for Belotti's head because he had lost one game. But fair weather fans are a side effect of a program that can sell 60,000 tickets to a game in a town with only 140,000 games. I was at Stanford yesterday and the way Toby Gerhart was running I think most teams would have had difficulty with the Cardinal. As for BSU it is a total fraudulent team I think even the Huskies would have a winning record if they could feast on the likes of UC Davis. I hope BSU makes it to a good bowl game and gets stomped so we can shut the hicks up once and for all.
  23. <i>blurtyovan</i>
    261. Posted by blurtyovan Sun Nov 8 2:29pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Regarding Boise State 3-17 vs--I'm not sure who--but I believe you are saying teams from BCS conferences? My research suggests the Broncos beat Oregon State twice during this decade, and then if you add that to the three wins they are always yapping about, that would equal 5 wins. They have also lost to Washington State, and I suspect you included that loss, but not the two wins vs. OSU. Are you dissing OSU but not WSU? This is a silly argument you two have begun, but you need to get your facts straight. It seems to me the relevant issue is "how good my team is today," not 10 years ago. You could limit your discussions to 80 years ago, and neither of you might have much to crow about.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Who will win?

97%
of College Pick’em users predict Oregon will win the game

See this week’s Yahoo! Sports Experts football picks.

Conference Scoreboard

NCAAF - Week 10