Indiana Team Report

Printable View

Return to Original
  • Print

INSIDE SLANT

“What might have been” pretty much sums up the 2009 season, which came to an end with a 38-21 loss to in-state rival Purdue. That loss dropped IU to 4-8 overall and 1-7 in the Big Ten, landing the Hoosiers in the basement of the conference for the second straight year.

Head coach Bill Lynch isn’t expected to lose his job this offseason.

Lynch has two years left on his current contract, and Indiana believes the program has suffered from the coaching turnover during the past decade. Four coaches—Cam Cameron, Gerry DiNardo, Terry Hoeppner and Lynch—have led IU during that span, and another change wouldn’t be a sign the Hoosiers were righting the ship.

The job security of the assistant coaches, however, could become an issue. Lynch could go a number of ways to try to improve his squad. Co-defensive coordinators Brian George and Joe Palcic could be on the chopping block after seeing their defense land near the bottom of the Big Ten for the second straight year. Considering the Hoosiers boasted seniors at better than half the starting positions on “D,” George and Palcic didn’t exactly prove themselves as coaches who can develop stars.

On the offensive side, coordinator Matt Canada has felt some heat, but his job seems safe because IU did manage to put together a number of long drives this season and was effective in a number of games.

The Hoosiers were far more competitive this season than they were last year, and the team’s leadership was a big reason. Whether the seniors have passed on their leadership skills to the juniors who will take over the team captaincy is unknown, but that process will begin early in the offseason, and the coaching staff seems to believe it has the potential to build a solid foundation for the program.

The 2009 season could have been much different if a few more breaks had gone IU’s way. The Hoosiers’ average margin of defeat during the 2008 season was 26.2 points, and five losses came by 24 or more points. In ’09, IU lost games by an average of 14 points, but only one of those games was a true laugher (IU’s 47-7 loss to Virginia in October) and three of the games were decided by three points or less.

Success is a tough thing to quantify, but the Hoosiers do seem to believe they are on the right path. The seat under Lynch will continue to be toasty, especially if he doesn’t make changes during the offseason.

From a player standpoint, quarterback Ben Chappell will have to work to improve his accuracy or else redshirt-freshmen-to-be Edward Wright Baker and Dustin Kiel could challenge the for the starting job. Running back Darius Willis must avoid injuries, and Indiana’s young defensive ends, cornerbacks and safeties must take huge strides to shore up the “D” come next year.

Last offseason was marked by Indiana’ efforts to refocus the players to prepare for the season. This offseason is about polishing the rough edges and getting ready to take the next step. Whatever the result will be in 2010, this year’s offseason will be critical to the future of the program.

NOTES, QUOTES

Game Of The Year:   Michigan 36, Indiana 33—It might seem odd for a loss to be IU’s biggest game, but the Hoosiers really took a blow when they couldn’t hold on to beat the Wolverines in the Big House.

RB Darius Willis proved he could be a star by rushing for 152 yards and two touchdowns, and WR Tandon Doss enjoyed a breakout game with five catches for 104 yards. The loss also showed IU’s flaws—Michigan scored two long touchdowns, and IU’s offense repeatedly failed to score touchdowns in the red zone. Indiana battled all season, but the loss to Michigan took a lot of the wind out of the players’ sails. Every other close game brought up a feeling of, “Here we go again,” and IU’s inability to seal the deal in Ann Arbor set the program back.

Players Of The Year:  

WR Tandon Doss—Doss made 77 catches for 962 yards and five touchdowns, and he repeatedly turned short passes into quality gains. He finished two grabs shy of IU’s single-season receptions record, and Doss provided some flexibility in the offense by rushing for 129 yards on 14 carries. Doss proved he can be a go-to guy in the passing game, and he will take over more of a leadership role this offseason.

MLB Matt Mayberry—The senior linebacker not only led the Hoosiers with 108 tackles, but he added 11 tackles for loss and was second on the team with 5.5 sacks. He added three interceptions to his stat line as well. But Mayberry’s contributions went far beyond the numbers. He was a leader in the locker room, and he was one of the Hoosiers who played every game like it was his last. Mayberry will be missed on and off the field next year.

Fast Forward:   Indiana will suffer major losses on the defensive side of the ball, with starting DEs Jammie Kirlew and Greg Middleton, FS Nick Polk, SS Austin Thomas, MLB Matt Mayberry, CB Ray Fisher and WLB Will Patterson all headed for the cap and gown. Offensively the Hoosiers lose four-year starters Pete Saxon and Rodger Saffold from the offensive line.

On the other hand, IU returns all of its top receivers, its starting quarterback and running back, and DTs Adam Replogle, Nick Sliger and Larry Black, Jr., all showed potential this season. If IU can plug in decent parts on defense without suffering too much of a setback, the Hoosiers should continue to stay competitive next season.

Recruiting Trail:   Indiana’s recruiting class is 21 strong, but it still ranks among the bottom teams in the Big Ten. That being said, IU will welcome more talent to Bloomington than it has in recent recruiting classes, and JUCO DB Andre Kates could be an immediate starter if he shows up at IU. The Hoosiers already lost highly-touted DE Jibreel Black, who de-committed after seeing Indiana’s poor start to the season, and there is a fear that Kates will take the same path out of town. Indiana could turn to more JUCO players to help bolster the team, especially on defense.

Quote To Note:   “The thing about this season is that we’ve basically been trying to put this team on the right track. It was pretty much in shambles last year, and we wanted to make sure everyone knew how relentless and tough we were, how we would fight to the very end. With this team, we don’t want (the returning players next year) to continue where we left off. We want them to exceed that. We want them to come to camp to be even better than they are now. Those guys like Mitch Evans, (Matt) Evans, Tandon Doss, Damarlo Belcher, and even the guys behind us (the younger offensive linemen), they do a great job as well. I have the utmost faith in them, and they will be able to lead the team.”—Senior OLT Rodger Saffold on how the Hoosiers will replace the leadership they have enjoyed from the upperclassmen this season.

STRATEGY AND PERSONNEL

Players To Watch In 2010:   RB Darius Willis—Willis ran for 607 yards in just nine games for the Hoosiers, and his combination of speed and power make him tough to stop when he’s healthy. Willis missed three full games with injuries and was slowed by aches and pains in other outings. The Hoosiers need a healthy Willis to inject the running game with a playmaker.

WR Tandon Doss—Doss’ hands and speed set him apart, and he will help stretch the field for the Hoosiers. The experience Doss picked up this season will be invaluable next year, and he gives IU’s quarterbacks a big target downfield.

DT Adam Replogle—Replogle was effective as a true freshman and will benefit from a winter in the weight room. He has a nice first step and is disruptive in the backfield, and his high motor will make him a star in Bloomington in the near future.

Pro Prospects:  

DE Greg Middleton—Middleton led the country in sacks as a sophomore with 16, but his production fell off drastically over the past two years. He recorded just three sacks this season and will have to change a lot of minds when it comes to his attitude during draft workouts.

OL Rodger Saffold—Saffold is smart and has a lot of tools, and his size will allow him to at least get a look from NFL teams. The Hoosiers only gave up 16 sacks all season, and he has proven to be a solid, durable protector for QB’s blindsides.

FS Nick Polk—Polk’s versatility will draw interest from NFL squads, as will his speed. Polk improved as the season progressed and his knee-which he injured during the 2008 campaign-got stronger. He’s a converted wide receiver who bulked up to play safety three years ago, and he could be an asset both on offense and on special teams at the next level.

CB Ray Fisher—Fisher’s game is all about speed, and he has played on both sides of the ball. He will get some invites from NFL teams thanks to his return skills, and he could catch on somewhere thanks to his high motor.

Roster Report:  

• CB Donnell Jones played the second half of the season with a dislocated elbow, but he is expected to be back at full strength in the spring.

• QB Edward Wright-Baker and PK Mitch Ewald redshirted this past season, but the Hoosier coaching staff would have turned to them in a pinch even late in the season. They both will get a fair shot at earning playing time starting in the spring.

• There has been speculation that WR Mitchell Evans could be moved back to safety in the spring due to the depth at wide receiver, but the Hoosier coaching staff hasn’t discussed that issue publically yet.

Updated Dec 14, 1:25 am EST
digg del.icio.us
more

15 Comments

  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Mark Wed Dec 23, 2009 01:15 pm PST Report Abuse
    As the story goes, Bud Wilkinson allegedly said that even he couldn’t win at Indiana. Sadly, it’s been four decades since IU had a share of the Big Ten football championship and went to the Rose Bowl and even then it was only because of a somewhat outdated Big Ten rule that disallowed Purdue to go. Over the years, I’ve had numerous discussions with fellow alums about why we’ve had such a drought. Why the losing becomes overwhelming. And embarrassing. And a tradition. I recall that in the 60s the student body used to have an apathy cheer: “hip, hip, oh the hell with it.” Right, because it didn’t matter. After Purdue demolished IU 62-10 in 2008, I considered doing some research to see if the losses were as overwhelming as I had imagined them to be. Then I reconsidered to see what the Hoosiers would do in 2009. In the end, it didn’t matter since, apparently, failure breeds failure so this is what I discovered.
    I discovered that between 1968-69 (the year after they went to the Rose Bowl) and the end of the 2009 season, IU had won 182 games, lost 286 and tied 6 for a sterling winning percentage of 39%. In the Big Ten, they won 105, lost 221 and tied 4 for a staggering 32%. In that same period of time, the only other team not to win a Big Ten championship has been a former national powerhouse, Minnesota (with 6 National Championships), and in the last two years they’ve at least turned the program around. Likewise, in that same span of time, IU only won 7 or more games 7 times and 5 of them came under the charge of Bill Mallory who, ironically, was fired after a few “losing” seasons. Go figure. In the 2000s, including the latest Purdue humiliation, IU is 39-87 (31%) overall with the only winning season being 2007 and 21-63 (25%) in the Big Ten.
    The success of all football programs runs in cycles. Purdue, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, Michigan State even USC, Alabama, and Oklahoma all have had low points in their “winning traditions”, but those institutions have made a concerted effort to win at both the coaching level and at the facilities level. As a matter of fact, one has to go back 70 years to the era of Bo McMillan to find a coach with a winning record at IU and even he was only .500 in Big Ten games. Between their first Big Ten championship in 1945 and their second in 1967, IU won 64, lost 122 and tied 6 for an overall winning percentage of 33%. In the Big Ten, they won 32, lost 133 and tied 5 for an overall Big Ten winning percentage of 18%. As a matter of fact, in the seven years between 1960-1966, the year before its Rose Bowl, IU’s Big Ten winning percentage was 12.7%!
    What I find rather disconcerting, if not unacceptable, is that the institution has presumably recognized there has been a losing tradition at Indiana has accepted that losing tradition as part of an IU legacy. Ball don’t lie. I argue that while other institutions have looked for the best possible person to coach their teams, Indiana, except in the cases of Bill Mallory and John Pont (perhaps things might have changed with the late Terry Hoeppner), has not. I’ve often argued with fellow alums (and a former trustee) and have heard that because IU has never had a winning football tradition it’s hard to begin one. But I find that argument rather specious. For example, prior to 1980, no one would have ever considered the University of Miami (FLA) to be an example of a “traditional” football powerhouse. Yet in the past twenty-five years, since 1983, they won 5 national championships. In that same period of time, Michigan, Notre Dame, Alabama and Ohio State have only won one each and no one would have predicted in 1968 that the University of Cincinnati would be a top 5 football program by 2009.
    So, perhaps IU fans are asking too much. Since their first season in 1887 (of course they went, 0-1-1), IU’s overall football record is 440-591-43 (43%) with a Big Ten record of 189-432-24 (30%). Astonishingly consistent. Let’s put that in perspective. In other words, in order for IU to get even overall, they’d have to go 12-0 for the next 12 ½ years and in order to get even in the Big Ten alone they’d have to go 7-0 every year until the year 2041 or so. But at this rate, (i.e. losing 9 games a year) IU Football could very well achieve that magic number of 1000 losses by the year 2055! But when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, there’s the old IU-Purdue rivalry for the Old Oaken Bucket which Purdue leads 57-26. So, if the Hoosiers win the next 31 games, then by 2040 they’ll be even. Maybe Wilkinson was right. It appears to me that unless IU is serious about changing this 123-year atmosphere of failure by hiring a high caliber coach and building a football program on which it can be proud, it might consider dropping out of the Big Ten and becoming a Division III team. At least at that point there’s always the possibility of breaking even.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Richard L Mon Dec 14, 2009 05:22 am PST Report Abuse
    Despite some exciting games this year, overall 2009 result is disappointing, especially when you are again last in the Big Ten. 2010 recruiting seems better on average but Hoosiers did lose some quality starters on both offense and the defense. I believe the core offensive players are there but we need to make sure that the OL improves on the blocking assignments and protecting the QB. CB and safeties are the achilles heel of the Hoosiers and when Fisher came down with the injuries, the secondary is full of holes. I am especially worried about Hoosiers defense next year which means we could be back to 2008 in terms of widening losing margins.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Michael Mon Nov 02, 2009 05:13 pm PST Report Abuse
    Iowa was undisputed at 8-0. Now, because of the officiating, they are a questionable 9-0 team. Could they have won on Saturday without the refs handing them the game? Guess we'll never know. But I'll tell you one thing about the Indiana/Iowa game...it proved what everyone is saying all along in that the scumbags running the Big 10 are the most corrupt college officials in the nation.

    There's a reason why the Big 10 is universally hated...it's not because of strength, because they are consistently the weakest power conference in the NCAA. It's because they are run by the biggest d0uchbag in NCAA history.

    Can't wait to watch the Big 10 go bowling again and choke! Go Big 12!
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Randy H Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:34 pm PST Report Abuse
    Indiana got beat by the Refs and a over-rated Iowa team.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    JHawk Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:53 am PST Report Abuse
    I am not a Big 10 fan at all, so I didn't care which team won Saturday. I watched the game and could not believe all of the terrible calls. Indiana lost a touchdown that they made. The replay officials certainly wanted to make sure that Iowa stayed high in the rankings. I feel bad for Indiana.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Brad Wed Oct 28, 2009 01:23 pm PDT Report Abuse
    I'm sorry, Richard L...in what universe is Iowa a "middle of the pack" Big 10 team? Last time I checked...which was about 5 minutes ago...Iowa was the sole and undisputed (8-0) head of the pack. Which isn't really any different than when you posted your comment a couple weeks ago, when they were also undefeated in the Big 10 (undefeated period, actually). So what do they have to do to get out of the middle? Go back in time and win some games in previous seasons?
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Richard L Wed Oct 21, 2009 05:22 am PDT Report Abuse
    "The players believe they are better than their record shows, and they truly think they are a bad call (Michigan) and the flu (Virginia) away from being 6-1". I am a loyal IU fan but I like to know which players think like that or that's the figment of imagination of the writer? All we want is for players to show efforts and desire to win in the game. Indiana hasn’t won in Evanston in 16 years so if they can reverse that trend with a win this Saturday, it is already a tremendous improvement. (Last year's win was at home). NW is almost a one man show. Front line and LBs must play well and key on Kafka without giving him the options to pitch out or throw the ball on the run. Make him eat the ball and don't miss the tackles.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Richard L Sun Oct 18, 2009 08:41 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Great win against the Illini. What a turnaround in performance by the Hoosiers. We need two more wins for the postseason appearance. Let's be realistic, it will be tough against Iowa and Penn State, both away games. Just don't get blown away like in the Virginia game. Keep the scores respectable. Most likely wins will be against NW, Wisconsin and Purdue. Two out of three will make it and I like Hoosiers' chances against NW and Purdue. Hoosiers have good enough offense to win ball games but need the defensive players to show up every game to hold up the fort and don't get blown away. Go Hoosiers go.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Richard L Wed Oct 14, 2009 01:51 am PDT Report Abuse
    There has been no further comment since my last one of Oct. 6. That shows how much interest there is in IU football. Complete apathy. Unless the Hoosiers turn around this homecoming weekend against the Illini (which is another under-achiever) and give an impressive showing this weekend, I am afraid most of the IU fans have better things to do each weekend than to get humiliated again. It's time for the football players to stand up and show why IU fans should care how their football team performs. Otherwise we are all going to start watching basketball (Hoosiers' hysteria) instead.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Richard L Tue Oct 06, 2009 05:11 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Not only is Pryor the difference, OSU team speed and overall size showed that IU still has some way to catch up to the top echelon teams. Against Virginia, we need to play steady errorless football. On paper, IU is much stronger both in the running and passing game, as well as the defensive part of the game. This game is important because a win will restore that confidence again that IU football is competitive and moving up in the right direction. A win is also important for the number of wins needed to get into the bowl round. The remaining games against Big Ten's middle of the pack teams (Illinois, NW, Iowa, Wisconsin, Purdue) will dictate where Hoosiers end up in the standing. A 3-2 record is the minimum and a 4-1 record here will definitely put Hoosiers into the bowl season. I am holding my breath on that Penn State game. Virginia game is crucial in terms adding to that number of wins. Go Hoosiers go.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    reb Sat Oct 03, 2009 03:46 am PDT Report Abuse
    If the Hoosiers force Pryor to pass they have a great opportunity to secure a victory.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    John Thu Sep 24, 2009 06:44 pm PDT Report Abuse
    GO I U cover the spread BIG BLUE is pretty full of themselves GO BOILERS GO ND
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    4TruthandJustice Sun Sep 20, 2009 02:54 am PDT Report Abuse
    I'm sure that beating the Akron Zips will bolster Hoosier confidence in their upcoming battle with the Michigan Wolverines in the Big House next Saturday. After all, Indiana has beaten Michigan FIVE times since 1949.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Romey Sat Sep 12, 2009 07:22 am PDT Report Abuse
    The Hoosiers are nothing but a speed bump in the Big Ten. Hope you enjoyed your Eastern Kentucky win because it may be the only one you get this season. GO BRONCOS!!
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Richard L Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:53 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Either the front line is not doing their job or the running backs are too slow to hit the holes. Lynch really needs to improve the running game to open up opponents for the passing game. Corners have to learn to play tighter to reduce the big plays and at this point, safeties must cover cornerbacks' mistakes with linebackers having to work harder to cover the much larger vacant middle. Everyone has just got to do their own job first.

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.

Video Spotlight