Surging Stanford won’t surprise USC this time

  • Print

LOS ANGELES (AP)—A mere two years after Stanford’s last trip to the Coliseum ended with arguably the biggest college football upset of the decade, coaches Jim Harbaugh and Pete Carroll both clearly want to forget it.

It’s easy to understand why Carroll wouldn’t want to rehash a one-point loss to a 41-point underdog that cemented No. 11 Southern California’s reputation for inexplicable defeats in otherwise flawless seasons.

It’s a bit tougher to figure out why Harbaugh has so little to say about the most impressive win of his coaching life—until he insists he’s got no time to think about anything but the challenges faced by 25th-ranked Stanford in its return to USC on Saturday.

“It was a great thrill of winning, the ultimate feeling of victory,” Harbaugh said. “Everything we’ve been through up to this point has built us to what we are now. The good and the bad, the horrible and the great. This team has matured a lot from 2007.”

Stanford (6-3, 5-2) will need that maturity to keep up its late-breaking run at the Pac-10 championship after consecutive wins over Arizona State and Oregon. Yet if the Cardinal can keep rolling at USC (7-2, 4-2) in a game that amounts to a conference title eliminator, it won’t be nearly as shocking as that 24-23 win in 2007—still the Trojans’ only loss in 48 home games since 2001.

Stanford won with a script that would have been rejected for its rampant improbabilities by the famed USC film school, particularly that fourth-down TD pass thrown by a backup quarterback in the final minute after a frantic late-game rally. The Cardinal left a stunned Coliseum in their wake—and back home on The Farm, students still walk around campus today in T-shirts reading “Biggest. Upset. Ever.”

Carroll didn’t plan to mention the loss to his team.

“I won’t bring up the visit to their place last year, either,” Carroll said of last season’s business-as-usual 45-23 win at Stanford Stadium.

Stanford tailback Toby Gerhart sat out the 2007 game with a knee injury that consumed almost his entire sophomore year, while quarterback Andrew Luck had committed to the Cardinal, but was still in high school in Houston. Luck remembers watching the game with friends, saying they “all went nuts” when Stanford ended it with its fourth interception of injured USC quarterback John David Booty, whom Carroll kept in the game with a broken finger on his throwing hand.

Two years later, the Cardinal appear to be in top shape for arguably their most important game since their 1999 run to the Rose Bowl, with a sturdy offense built around Pac-10 rushing leader Gerhart. Stanford is back in the AP Top 25 and bowl-eligible for the first time since the close of the 2001 season.

“This is another huge opportunity, if not bigger than last week,” Gerhart said. “We won’t get any satisfaction by just beating Oregon and getting to a bowl game.”

Nothing is so clear-cut at USC after an inconsistent season from an offense that still hasn’t meshed with freshman quarterback Matt Barkley—and which won’t have top receiver Damian Williams, who’s out with a sprained ankle.

The Trojans’ seven-year run of Pac-10 titles is in trouble after a thrashing from Oregon followed by last week’s unimpressive win over Arizona State, which featured just one offensive touchdown and Barkley’s worst performance.

“There’s a lot of things that go into it, (but) I’ll take the responsibility for that because it starts with the quarterback,” said Barkley, 28 of 60 for just 299 yards with two interceptions in the Trojans’ last two games. “We’ve made a lot of corrections. I’ve corrected a lot of things in my game, mentally and physically.”

For all the Cardinal’s apparent advantages, USC still is practically unbeatable at the Coliseum, where the Trojans have played just twice in the past nine weeks. They’ll finish the season with three straight home games—and with a little help from Oregon’s opponents, the Trojans could still be in the mix for another conference title and a BCS bowl game.

“It feels like it’s been a whole year since we’ve been back to the Coliseum,” USC tailback Joe McKnight said. “We’ve done a lot of work on getting it back to normal this week, and I think we’re going to be fine.”

Show your friends — and the nation — you know your college football. Sign up to play College Bowl Pick'em!
Updated Nov 13, 5:53 pm EST
digg del.icio.us
more

25 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Tony C
    25. Posted by Tony C Sat Nov 14 6:40pm EST

    Report Abuse

    DAMN!!! Talk about just rolling over and taking up the ass!!!
  2. Larry B
    24. Posted by Larry B Sat Nov 14 3:20pm EST

    Report Abuse

    # 15 please leave and good riddance.

    The giant sucking sound we will all hear is you curing your recrocranial inversion by actually learning something
  3. Larry B
    23. Posted by Larry B Sat Nov 14 3:15pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Concered: You should be concerned more about your sanity than anything else. You sure don't know anything about college football.
  4. BMW
    22. Posted by BMW Sat Nov 14 1:25pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Go Stanford! Would love to see captain comeback at MICHIGAN instead of Rich Rod: who is only great for one school here MSU-he's made them happy!
  5. <i>cuzzdj8</i>
    21. Posted by cuzzdj8 Sat Nov 14 1:04pm EST

    Report Abuse

    USC still has a chance to win the pac 10 title and go to the rose bowl. However, Oregon still has to lose. Overall, USC had so many chances to win more national titles if they had a playoff system. And finally, the BCS system sucks balls and gives no other great teams a chance for a national title run. It mostly favors the SEC and BIG 12. They can have their money making bowl games but, have a playoff system with the top 8 teams afterwards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  6. Jeff P
    20. Posted by Jeff P Sat Nov 14 12:27pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Stanford and Arizona should beat USC. Ucla might, but don't hold your breath. At this point in the season, if you don't have it, you never will. USC just doesn't have it.
    They recruit great, then coached them to lose. The AD needs to step in and make adjustments.
  7. Mike B
    19. Posted by Mike B Sat Nov 14 12:02pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Great post Amber!
  8. matthew
    18. Posted by matthew Sat Nov 14 10:44am EST

    Report Abuse

    USC cant tackle the short compact little running backs such as the Oregon schools have, however, Stanford's stud running back is not as fortunate. Gerhart is big, strong, agile, and although he can run, he presents USC with a pretty big target. USC's #2 and his gang of linebackers will have a big game today and hopefully they dont hurt the stud. USC 28 Stanford 17.
    matt.
  9. concerned
    17. Posted by concerned Sat Nov 14 10:17am EST

    Report Abuse

    I believe in beaver...Leave it to Beaver too, but the PAC ten is not what SEC or Big are and at best might be at best the 3rd best conference or tied for for third with the ACC and Big Ten and the Big East. USC can't go undefeated with the most talented teams in the country. BC plays them in 2011 or 2012. I think that will be a close game, give the edge to BC, lol!
  10. RU4EAL
    16. Posted by RU4EAL Sat Nov 14 9:56am EST

    Report Abuse

    PAC10 -------Best conference in the country.

    Watch as the Beavers run the table and go to the Rose Bowl.
  11. OSUITBTE
    15. Posted by OSUITBTE Sat Nov 14 9:44am EST

    Report Abuse

    Weak teams in a weak conference no one cares about. Oh no! USC was beat by a crummy Oregon team who in turn was beat by a crummy Stanford team who in turn could be beat by a crummy USC team. The Pac-10 is pathetic and just because you beat each other doesn't mean you're any good. I'd rather see Stanford win but even if they do it doesn't prove anything against an over-rated USC squad who are 4th in their conference.

    All Pac-10 teams would be bottom feeders in all of the other conferences.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! I'm not even going to come back to this article it's so ridiculous.
  12. Lawrence
    14. Posted by Lawrence Sat Nov 14 8:58am EST

    Report Abuse

    DC - They will become the biggest joke in the NCAA if:
    A - they lose this game
    or
    B - come looking for revenge

    The new paragraph could lead to confusion.

    If they fall behind, is Pete Carroll going to suit up and take the field?
  13. <i>kammeres</i>
    13. Posted by kammeres Sat Nov 14 5:37am EST

    Report Abuse

    Amber at #7, that was a great zinger at the end of your post. Can I can use that?
  14. Brad
    12. Posted by Brad Sat Nov 14 3:50am EST

    Report Abuse

    Hopefully USC's defense steps up and makes something of this game, because Stanford's offense is hot right now. If they do it'll be close, but I'm going to give Stanford the slight edge in this one. Gerhart powers close to 100 yards and Luck is playing especially well on USC's off year. Barkley is just a freshman, and given time he'll turn into quite a QB, but not right now, not with the way USC's offense has been struggling.

    Stanford-24
    USC-21
  15. richard s
    11. Posted by richard s Sat Nov 14 3:02am EST

    Report Abuse

    Fight on for usc! fight on for victory! fight on for usc!
  16. DC
    10. Posted by DC Sat Nov 14 1:30am EST

    Report Abuse

    Ay rickyellis95,

    If you don't care, get yo @ss off the page.

    Now, as for the rest of you:
    There is absolutely NO WAY that USC is gonna drop this game. After that upset a couple years ago, USC is lookin' for revenge.

    If they do, they will become the biggest joke in NCAA football this year. Pete Carroll is NOT ABOUT TO LET THAT HAPPEN.
  17. ERIC N
    9. Posted by ERIC N Fri Nov 13 11:13pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I don't think it matters how motivated USC may be to not lose this game at home. I think Stanford has too much up front offensively for USC's defense. Who could have imagined saying that three years ago?

    Stanford 38
    USC 28
  18. GaryB
    8. Posted by GaryB Fri Nov 13 10:19pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Stanford will win by a couple touchdowns. Gerhart should have big day and Luck will do enough in the passing game to keep SC's less than stellar defense this year from making any impact. PAC 10 is the toughest conference as stated earlier by established facts. These SEC people just can't seem to accept it.
  19. Amber
    7. Posted by Amber Fri Nov 13 9:50pm EST

    Report Abuse

    rickyellis95 You obviously have not kept up with Conference rankings, The Pac 10 was chosen as a better conference in the ranking. in 4 out of 6 computer rankings. Or does your ignorant opinion that only thing that matter in your little world? Who stopped the payment on your reality check
  20. Amber
    6. Posted by Amber Fri Nov 13 9:48pm EST

    Report Abuse

    bcbcbcbc1 You speak like a true idiot. All you do is speck giberish. When allis said & done The Trojans will be the one with the W.
  21. <i>bcbcbcbc1</i>
    5. Posted by bcbcbcbc1 Fri Nov 13 8:21pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Yopu gotta be kidding me at the end-oregon reamed usc-awesome to enjoy and stanford just played neck and neck and beat otregon-so coliseum will just make sc lose by 7- pts less-will still be stanfird by !$ or more-trojans are going down-spent contraceptives at best! whahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
  22. <i>rickyellis95</i>
    4. Posted by rickyellis95 Fri Nov 13 7:58pm EST

    Report Abuse

    wHO CARES, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ typical clown game, in a clown conference,
  23. <i>trainmaster0816</i>
    3. Posted by trainmaster0816 Fri Nov 13 7:54pm EST

    Report Abuse

    YAWWNNNNN, seasons over for both these teams as far as national title chase, maybe 50000 people show up
  24. <i>iknowwhereyoulive27</i>
    2. Posted by iknowwhereyoulive27 Fri Nov 13 7:49pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Stanford wil win in the colliseum BIG 42 24
  25. Misch
    1. Posted by Misch Fri Nov 13 6:06pm EST

    Report Abuse

    USC wins a close one.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Video Spotlight