Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:34 pm EST
This week's crazy playoff plan comes from Ed Gunther, proprietor of the very wonky site The National Championship Issue, which, shockingly, concerns itself with nothing but college football's national championship issue. Ed's pet playoff plan is something he calls the "evolved playoff, designed to minimize controversy while maximizing tradition:
- - -
A Playoff + The Polls = The Evolved Playoff.
Step 1: Set up a regular playoff bracket, No. 1 vs No. 16, No. 2, vs No. 15, etc. (or No. 1 vs No. 8, No. 1 vs No. 32 -- it works with any amount of teams).
Step 2: Play the games
Step 3: Re-rank the teams
The No. 1 team lost? Fine, they deserve to drop in the rankings. Do they deserve to drop out of the playoff? No, probably not. But losing just earned them a harder matchup in the next round.
Set up the next round of the bracket using the new rankings and with half the amount of teams you started with. Play the games and repeat as necessary.
Here’s why the Evolved Playoff works:
1. The regular season is still of major importance. How well you play in the regular season will determine how much of a cushion you have when the post season starts. In this system, it’s the whole season, not just the postseason, that is taken into account.
2 It’s not single elimination. In a regular playoff, if you have one fluky game or if your star gets injured and you lose because of it, you’re going home. You could have had the best season in the history of the sport up until that point, but it doesn’t matter. In this system, each round will feature matchups of the strongest teams over the course of the whole season, not just who won in the previous round.
3. The polls are still part of the process. In a playoff, intangibles aren’t taken into account. There was a bad call by the refs at the end? Too bad. In this system, the polls act as a failsafe because they can right the wrongs that might occur. Imagine if Oklahoma vs. Oregon in 2006 had been a playoff game -- too bad, Sooners. Go home. That could be rectified in this system because the rankings are so flexible throughout.
4. It can be modified to suit a number of different scenarios. You want an 8-team playoff? Fine. Sixteen teams? No problem.Thirty-two? Okay. Bigger numbers and more teams don’t affect this system.
5. It’s particularly well suited for college football. It keeps the tradition of the polls but provides the on-the-field matchups that will enable everyone to agree on a national champion.
- - -
To see the Evolved Playoff in action, check out Ed's evolved version of the 2005 season, listed at his site as the "Modified Season." I have no idea how this works, but Texas still won that year, just like in real life, so it must have something going for it.
- - -
Do you have a crazy playoff bracket? Send it our way: sundaymorningqb-at-yah00, etc. Include your name and location, and the wackiest way possible to wind our way toward a true national champion. Remember: Edit for length, and visuals are always a plus.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
6 Comments
1 - 6 of 6
Report Abuse
The closest thing I've ever thought of is to have the top team from each conference compete in a some sort of playoff, of course this probably adds like 7 or 8 games to the process...
Report Abuse
You can argue about who should be in a playoff or the logistics, but i don't think you can changes the basic "win or go home" part of the playoff. That defeats the whole "decide it on the field" point of playoffs.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
So, in response to Hokie and Kenny (and I had the same initial complaint too), teams aren't automatically eliminated if they're voted lower in the next week. For example, let's say Georgia is ranked #15, wins in the first week ugly, and drops to #18. They still play a team between #17 and #32 in Week 2, and if their second win is impressive enough, Georgia could jump way up in the polls. The only catch is that they'd have to get to #8 or higher, but even if they don't, they could win again in Week 3 and hope to crack the top four. (However, if anyone can make rhyme or reason of Gunther's method for seeding the lowest ranked teams, please let me know... looking at them made my brain hurt.)
Also, I realize that my last paragraph might have made no sense whatsoever. If you fall into that category, check out Gunther's website; it's easier than trying to put it into words. (Another knock against the idea, but oh well.)
Report Abuse
rhpinsat@yahoo.com
1 - 6 of 6