Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

This week's crazy playoff plan comes from Ed Gunther, proprietor of the very wonky site The National Championship Issue, which, shockingly, concerns itself with nothing but college football's national championship issue. Ed's pet playoff plan is something he calls the "evolved playoff, designed to minimize controversy while maximizing tradition:

- - -
A Playoff + The Polls = The Evolved Playoff.

Step 1: Set up a regular playoff bracket, No. 1 vs No. 16, No. 2, vs No. 15, etc. (or No. 1 vs No. 8, No. 1 vs No. 32 -- it works with any amount of teams).

Step 2: Play the games

Step 3: Re-rank the teams

The No. 1 team lost? Fine, they deserve to drop in the rankings. Do they deserve to drop out of the playoff? No, probably not. But losing just earned them a harder matchup in the next round.

Set up the next round of the bracket using the new rankings and with half the amount of teams you started with. Play the games and repeat as necessary.

Here’s why the Evolved Playoff works:

1. The regular season is still of major importance. How well you play in the regular season will determine how much of a cushion you have when the post season starts. In this system, it’s the whole season, not just the postseason, that is taken into account.

2 It’s not single elimination. In a regular playoff, if you have one fluky game or if your star gets injured and you lose because of it, you’re going home. You could have had the best season in the history of the sport up until that point, but it doesn’t matter. In this system, each round will feature matchups of the strongest teams over the course of the whole season, not just who won in the previous round.

3. The polls are still part of the process. In a playoff, intangibles aren’t taken into account. There was a bad call by the refs at the end? Too bad. In this system, the polls act as a failsafe because they can right the wrongs that might occur. Imagine if Oklahoma vs. Oregon in 2006 had been a playoff game -- too bad, Sooners. Go home. That could be rectified in this system because the rankings are so flexible throughout.

4. It can be modified to suit a number of different scenarios. You want an 8-team playoff? Fine. Sixteen teams? No problem.Thirty-two? Okay. Bigger numbers and more teams don’t affect this system.

5. It’s particularly well suited for college football. It keeps the tradition of the polls but provides the on-the-field matchups that will enable everyone to agree on a national champion.
- - -

To see the Evolved Playoff in action, check out Ed's evolved version of the 2005 season, listed at his site as the "Modified Season." I have no idea how this works, but Texas still won that year, just like in real life, so it must have something going for it.

- - -
Do you have a crazy playoff bracket? Send it our way: sundaymorningqb-at-yah00, etc. Include your name and location, and the wackiest way possible to wind our way toward a true national champion. Remember: Edit for length, and visuals are always a plus.

digg delicious
more

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. gaborik10m
    1. Posted by gaborik10m Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Theres far too many teams to ever get a near perfect determination of who's actually #1, it will always be flawed unless you play a 200 game season.
    The closest thing I've ever thought of is to have the top team from each conference compete in a some sort of playoff, of course this probably adds like 7 or 8 games to the process...
  2. Legal Hokie
    2. Posted by Legal Hokie Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:39 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    So this would allow a team to lose, yet still remain in the playoff, and by doing so they would, necessarily, eliminate a team that won their playoff game? That makes absolutely no sense. That would turn playoffs into more of a politicking farce than the current MNC.
    You can argue about who should be in a playoff or the logistics, but i don't think you can changes the basic "win or go home" part of the playoff. That defeats the whole "decide it on the field" point of playoffs.
  3. MattchuOwnsYou
    3. Posted by MattchuOwnsYou Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:17 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think I have somewhat of a whacky way to appease most, and not make it too crazy long. Step 1, cut down the regular season a little. Most teams play 8-9 conference games and 3-4 out of conference. Cut this down to 6-7, 2-3 conf and non-conf respectively. Rankings come into play with the seeding of the teams in my "playoff". Ranking the top 20 teams we split them into 4 groups of 5 and enforce a sort of Round Robin format that's double elimination. The top 4 teams in each group must be conference champions, and earn an automatic 1-0 record in Round 1 of Round Robin play. Win 2, move on, Lose 2, go home. The top 8 teams move on to Round 2, split into 4 teams per group. Losses from Round 1 carry over to prevent extending the season too long and also to keep up the importance of Round 1 games. Top 2 teams from these groups move on to play for the national championship. Bowl games will be reserved for teams not playing for the national championship. Thats all the BCS is doing anyway, right? This system rewards the powerhouses who are consistently winning, as well as the teams who get hot at the right time. As far as rankings go to determine seeding, it can be a "BCSque" combination of human polls and computer rankings. Margin of victory will be a small equation added to the computer rankings which will take into effect the fact of you blowing away your opponent with 3rd and 4th string players. This is just off the top of my head so bear with the details of it a little bit, im at work and have nothing better to do lol.
  4. Kenny P
    4. Posted by Kenny P Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What a stupid idea. You need to spend our time thinking of something else. So, let me get this straight, No. 32 could beat No. 1 and not get ranked high enough to continue. But No. 1 could lose to No. 32 and still be ranked high enough to keep playing. This system of CHANGE would probably pass Obama's standards but not college football fans. Sorry.
  5. hr209
    5. Posted by hr209 Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Doc, you had the general idea, but I think you might have misrepresented one crucial detail. In his Evolved Playoff version of the 2005 season, the first round has #1 vs. #32, #2 vs. #31, etc. In the second week, it's #1 vs. #16 and down the line, but #17 through #32 are still playing.
    So, in response to Hokie and Kenny (and I had the same initial complaint too), teams aren't automatically eliminated if they're voted lower in the next week. For example, let's say Georgia is ranked #15, wins in the first week ugly, and drops to #18. They still play a team between #17 and #32 in Week 2, and if their second win is impressive enough, Georgia could jump way up in the polls. The only catch is that they'd have to get to #8 or higher, but even if they don't, they could win again in Week 3 and hope to crack the top four. (However, if anyone can make rhyme or reason of Gunther's method for seeding the lowest ranked teams, please let me know... looking at them made my brain hurt.)
    Also, I realize that my last paragraph might have made no sense whatsoever. If you fall into that category, check out Gunther's website; it's easier than trying to put it into words. (Another knock against the idea, but oh well.)
  6. RICHARD
    6. Posted by RICHARD Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Create eight super conferences by geographic location. Most of these are in place (PAC 10, Big10, Big 12, etc). Each conference should have twelve teams. If the schedule depicts the Big 12 procedure, there is ample room for each team to play rivals of what they need to schedule. This would create sixteen division leaders. There could be division playoffs for the eight team playoff, or use all Sixteen teams for the playoff. What an opportunity for those teams to prove their quest.
    rhpinsat@yahoo.com

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers