Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

After Preston Parker's midnight ride cost him a roster spot in February, I reviewed Florida State's relative lack of returning playmakers, and Corey Surrency played a prominent role in the analysis. Surrency was only an occasional player in FSU's offense in his first year out of El Camino (Calif.) Community College, but he did average almost 20 yards with four touchdowns on just 12 catches, flashing some of the talent that made him one of the most sought-after JUCO transfers in the country. His size, speed and hype make him an obvious candidate for a senior breakout this fall.

Talent notwithstanding, that fate hasn't always been a foregone conclusion: Surrency, 24, grew up in rough part of Miami, dropped out of school in ninth grade and later spent 90 days in jail for what the Orlando Sentinel describes as "various crimes," including felonies. After prison, Surrency earned his diploma, played a season with a "minor league" team, Tampa's Miami's Florida Kings of the Southeast Football League, and eventually headed cross-country to El Camino, where he caught on and earned scholarship offers from all over the country. Whether or not he makes any more waves on the field, that's a success story -- or it was, until, as the Sentinel reports today, the narrative met one of the more obscure corners of the NCAA rulebook:

The rule is No. 14.2.3.5 in the NCAA Division I Manuel [sic]. It is titled, "Participation After 21st Birthday," and it mandates the following: If an individual participates in an organized sport after his 21st birthday, but before enrolling in college, that participation "shall count as one year of varsity competition in that sport."
[...]
Surrency played with the Kings after he had turned 21. Had he not, he might never have had the chance to go to college. Regardless, though, his time with the Kings has cost him his final year of eligibility — at least for now. Florida State is appealing on Surrency's behalf.

If FSU loses the appeal, Surrency's college football career would be over. It's likely, too, that [with the loss of his athletic scholarship] his pursuit of earning a degree in criminal justice — Surrency would become the first member of his family to earn a college degree — would also be over.

The rule, said NCAA spokesman Jennifer Kearns, is designed to "to minimize competitive advantage" by ensuring a "normal progression" through high school and the entry to college. Surrency, because his high school career was interrupted, got into the system too late.

Obviously, the rule is not designed to necessarily cater to individual athletes' best interests, which in Surrency's case is to remain in school another year and earn his degree, like anyone else in his situation who has the will, the means and the grades. It's tone-deaf bureaucracy par excellence: If the rule didn't exist, no one would think to look for it; no one would think twice about any practical, non-bureaucratic issues, or feel the need to think up some kind of tangible problem that would result from Surrency finishing out the usual string. If he'd joined the Florida Kings at 19 or 20 years old, no one would bat an eye. Hell, if the sport in question was minor league baseball -- as it was for a certain winner of a certain trophy a few years ago -- he'd be in the clear.

But, the rules being what they are, Surrency waits while his teammates go through spring practice, telling reporter Andrew Carter, "It's killing me, man. I'm losing my fight for the game right now," while the NCAA takes its time to decide whether its bureaucracy is more sacred than a kid's best chance to finish his degree.

- - -
UPDATE [12:25 pm ET, 4/06] To be clear, the post refers to the Florida Kings of the Southeast Football League, not, as originally stated, the Florida Kings of the Southern Indoor Football League, which begin play this season.

digg delicious
more

3652 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Tim
    1. Posted by Tim Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:49 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    how can he play college football if he has already played professionally?
    aside from that, even as uf fan, this is just horrible. let the kid get his degree.
  2. Tyler
    2. Posted by Tyler Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Do it for the sake of the degree. This could ruin the kid's life.
  3. grounder
    3. Posted by grounder Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I have the same question as Tim, playing professionally in the same sport. I'd presume he got paid for the semi-pro team. (After looking up the rule, just playing in team uniforms or have an official score kept is enough to trigger the rule.)
    One other question - I'm not NCAA lover, but isn't FSU also being tone deaf here? I'm hoping that they have a backup plan to allow this guy to be able to afford to get his degree should his eligibility not be restored. Otherwise, who's using whom here?
    Also, according to this rule, your example of Weinke should have made him ineligible as a senior (and maybe even earlier). He participated in an organized sport (minor league baseball) after his 21st birthday, so he shouldn't have had a senior season. I found the rule online, and it appeared it would have been in effect when Weinke matriculated in 1996. In fact, based on my reading of it, Weinke would have lost 1 year for each year after turning 21, so he might have had only 1 year of eligibility left.
    So is the rule possibly moot because the NCAA failed to enforce it consistently? Or was Weinke ineligible for the last 2 title games (and those seasons), making Virginia Tech potentially the national champion? Oh, the worms this one may open.
  4. onecreditshort
    4. Posted by onecreditshort Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:49 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It was indoor football he played--that has little or no resemblance to actual football.
  5. grounder
    5. Posted by grounder Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Carl - Thanks. I went back and noticed I missed one critical word in my reading of it - the word 'that.' "In sports other than tennis and swimming and diving, any participation as an individual or a team representative in organized sports competition by a student during each 12-month period after the student’s 21st birthday and prior to initial full-time enrollment in a collegiate institution shall count as one year of varsity competition in that sport." I had thought I understood it like you did, until I "read" it, and thought it rather weird.
    Anyway, they need to do right by the kid - either the NCAA or FSU.
  6. Contrarion
    6. Posted by Contrarion Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    He already has a felony arrest on his record, degree or not his life is pretty much over! He can't get a law degree, be a police officer, parole, or probation officer, he will just be a felon with a degree! He should have been smart and went to a NFL combo! THE DEGREE IS WORTHLESS, WITH HIS FELONY CONVICTION!!!
  7. Julie
    7. Posted by Julie Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:44 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Here's a thought! He could get a student loan like everyone else! Im sure he could get a part time job in a gym or something too...maybe he could help with team training....there are all kinds of ways to pay for schooling this isn't going to destroy his chances of getting his degree. If it does he didn't really want it.
  8. Matt F
    8. Posted by Matt F Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The rule is idiotic and they should let him play to show that even people with pasts like his can grow up to bring something better to our country. Also on FSU's part if they do take him out of the program due to the rule they should at least show some heart and pay for his final year of his degree.
  9. rhahn2400
    9. Posted by rhahn2400 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    BS...this is not about the degree, it is about him playing football one more year. If he really wants to finish his degree, he can continue on his own...pay for it himself...like the majority of those who earn degrees. Lets get off this "its about the degree" crap!
  10. PaulW
    10. Posted by PaulW Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:45 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bummer that he probably won't be able to play football. The NCAA isn't likely to change their rules for one guy. However, his not playing football does NOT preclude him from finishing his degree. In fact, most students on a college campus do not get athletic scholarships or participate in intercollegiate sports. These facts do seem to preclude others from earning degrees. Of course, the school could step up and help the kid with his financial obligations even if he's not playing football. The logic in this argument is all wet.
  11. Mary
    11. Posted by Mary Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Football or no football, it seems as if FSU ought to be able to come up with financial aid to keep him in school. We're not talking F-5 Blackbird money here.
    And NCAA, get a clue: "normal progression" is no longer normal for a vast number of kids who attend part time, go to community colleges, stop out or drop out.
  12. maddog_207
    12. Posted by maddog_207 Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:02 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    They should at least allow this kid to pursue his degree. I mean, it would be a shame if they kick him out because of that. It seems like he's been trying to right himself after all the troubles he has gone through in his life.
  13. HC
    13. Posted by HC Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    rules are rules..if he wants to finish school he can get a job and finish...
    He should be happy to have the school he has...otherwise he would still be doing crimes like he was previously
  14. Vernon L P
    14. Posted by Vernon L P Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The degree is more important than the rule let him at least complete his education. FSU could make it happen.
  15. Jason
    15. Posted by Jason Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Let me see if I get this straight: without an athletic scholarship, he'll not be able to finish college? Hmmm..... I wonder how the 95% of those of us who did not have athletic awards ever made it through. Oh, that's right, he could take out a loan and now that he's NOT restricted, get a side job.
  16. LeCoque
    16. Posted by LeCoque Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It's a juvenile felony conviction which carries different implications than a felony conviction as an adult.
  17. John D
    17. Posted by John D Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I agree conpletely with 'rhahn2400' that this has absolutely nothing to do with the degree, and it is all about playing football. Just cause he loses his eligibility doesn't mean he can't continue to pursue his degree, regardless of whether he or the university pay for it. I'm willing to bet, though, that if he loses his eligibility, he'll havbe no interest in pursuing his degree.
  18. BballSicknesss
    18. Posted by BballSicknesss Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:57 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wow, that's to bad
  19. Barry Zito
    19. Posted by Barry Zito Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    So why didnt that rule apply for Chris Weinke? He played at least 3 seasons of minor league ball well after he was 21 right?
  20. Derek
    20. Posted by Derek Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm a little confused...
    He is being told he can't play football, not that he can't attend FSU.
    The school can give him a non-athletic scholarship to finish his degree. It happens all the time with medical retirements, etc. Or he can finish his degree by getting a job, taking out student loans, applying for financial aid, etc like numerous other people do who can't pay for their school all up front.
    Maybe he should be reinstated, but not playing football is not an excuse for not finishing his degree. Its poor reporting to confuse the two.
  21. John
    21. Posted by John Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I agree with the comments concerning the difference between indoor football and outdoor football. The otherside of the argument is they are both football, therefore Mr. Surrency should not be allowed to play. I do not agree with this claim but am simply stating it.
    I'd argue they are two different sports as there are different rules that govern each respectively. This is interesting as the letter of the law does not always correspond with moral law.
    I would say, let this kid play. Let him earn his degree. Perhaps he can serve as a role model to others who want to change their lot in life.
  22. BK
    22. Posted by BK Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:15 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Rules are made to be broken - so break this one wide open - get rid of it !!
  23. MM
    23. Posted by MM Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Let him finish his degree, without it he has a limited future, even with it he has a tough row to hoe with his record. FSU owes him that. As for football, the rule is clear - he's not eligable.
  24. Tek Jansen
    24. Posted by Tek Jansen Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "THE DEGREE IS WORTHLESS, WITH HIS FELONY CONVICTION!!! "
    --When you make a promise to your now deceased mother that you'll be the first family member to earn a 4-year degree, it seems empathetic to throw the word 'worthless' around.
  25. justin
    25. Posted by justin Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Always tryin to keep a brotha down....sad

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers