Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:46 pm EDT
After Preston Parker's midnight ride cost him a roster spot in February, I reviewed Florida State's relative lack of returning playmakers, and Corey Surrency played a prominent role in the analysis. Surrency was only an occasional player in FSU's offense in his first year out of El Camino (Calif.) Community College, but he did average almost 20 yards with four touchdowns on just 12 catches, flashing some of the talent that made him one of the most sought-after JUCO transfers in the country. His size, speed and hype make him an obvious candidate for a senior breakout this fall.
Talent notwithstanding, that fate hasn't always been a foregone conclusion: Surrency, 24, grew up in rough part of Miami, dropped out of school in ninth grade and later spent 90 days in jail for what the Orlando Sentinel describes as "various crimes," including felonies. After prison, Surrency earned his diploma, played a season with a "minor league" team, Tampa's Miami's Florida Kings of the Southeast Football League, and eventually headed cross-country to El Camino, where he caught on and earned scholarship offers from all over the country. Whether or not he makes any more waves on the field, that's a success story -- or it was, until, as the Sentinel reports today, the narrative met one of the more obscure corners of the NCAA rulebook:
The rule is No. 14.2.3.5 in the NCAA Division I Manuel [sic]. It is titled, "Participation After 21st Birthday," and it mandates the following: If an individual participates in an organized sport after his 21st birthday, but before enrolling in college, that participation "shall count as one year of varsity competition in that sport."
[...]
Surrency played with the Kings after he had turned 21. Had he not, he might never have had the chance to go to college. Regardless, though, his time with the Kings has cost him his final year of eligibility — at least for now. Florida State is appealing on Surrency's behalf.If FSU loses the appeal, Surrency's college football career would be over. It's likely, too, that [with the loss of his athletic scholarship] his pursuit of earning a degree in criminal justice — Surrency would become the first member of his family to earn a college degree — would also be over.
The rule, said NCAA spokesman Jennifer Kearns, is designed to "to minimize competitive advantage" by ensuring a "normal progression" through high school and the entry to college. Surrency, because his high school career was interrupted, got into the system too late.
Obviously, the rule is not designed to necessarily cater to individual athletes' best interests, which in Surrency's case is to remain in school another year and earn his degree, like anyone else in his situation who has the will, the means and the grades. It's tone-deaf bureaucracy par excellence: If the rule didn't exist, no one would think to look for it; no one would think twice about any practical, non-bureaucratic issues, or feel the need to think up some kind of tangible problem that would result from Surrency finishing out the usual string. If he'd joined the Florida Kings at 19 or 20 years old, no one would bat an eye. Hell, if the sport in question was minor league baseball -- as it was for a certain winner of a certain trophy a few years ago -- he'd be in the clear.
But, the rules being what they are, Surrency waits while his teammates go through spring practice, telling reporter Andrew Carter, "It's killing me, man. I'm losing my fight for the game right now," while the NCAA takes its time to decide whether its bureaucracy is more sacred than a kid's best chance to finish his degree.
- - -
UPDATE [12:25 pm ET, 4/06] To be clear, the post refers to the Florida Kings of the Southeast Football League, not, as originally stated, the Florida Kings of the Southern Indoor Football League, which begin play this season.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
3652 Comments
1 - 25 of 3652
Report Abuse
aside from that, even as uf fan, this is just horrible. let the kid get his degree.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
One other question - I'm not NCAA lover, but isn't FSU also being tone deaf here? I'm hoping that they have a backup plan to allow this guy to be able to afford to get his degree should his eligibility not be restored. Otherwise, who's using whom here?
Also, according to this rule, your example of Weinke should have made him ineligible as a senior (and maybe even earlier). He participated in an organized sport (minor league baseball) after his 21st birthday, so he shouldn't have had a senior season. I found the rule online, and it appeared it would have been in effect when Weinke matriculated in 1996. In fact, based on my reading of it, Weinke would have lost 1 year for each year after turning 21, so he might have had only 1 year of eligibility left.
So is the rule possibly moot because the NCAA failed to enforce it consistently? Or was Weinke ineligible for the last 2 title games (and those seasons), making Virginia Tech potentially the national champion? Oh, the worms this one may open.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Anyway, they need to do right by the kid - either the NCAA or FSU.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And NCAA, get a clue: "normal progression" is no longer normal for a vast number of kids who attend part time, go to community colleges, stop out or drop out.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
He should be happy to have the school he has...otherwise he would still be doing crimes like he was previously
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
He is being told he can't play football, not that he can't attend FSU.
The school can give him a non-athletic scholarship to finish his degree. It happens all the time with medical retirements, etc. Or he can finish his degree by getting a job, taking out student loans, applying for financial aid, etc like numerous other people do who can't pay for their school all up front.
Maybe he should be reinstated, but not playing football is not an excuse for not finishing his degree. Its poor reporting to confuse the two.
Report Abuse
I'd argue they are two different sports as there are different rules that govern each respectively. This is interesting as the letter of the law does not always correspond with moral law.
I would say, let this kid play. Let him earn his degree. Perhaps he can serve as a role model to others who want to change their lot in life.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
--When you make a promise to your now deceased mother that you'll be the first family member to earn a 4-year degree, it seems empathetic to throw the word 'worthless' around.
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 3652