Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

Most readers may not know much about the Mountain West, and except for some warm underdog love for Utah's improbable perfection, probably don't care much. But you have to give the MWC this: It's taking all its swings. With the Utes' success and TCU and BYU also landing in the final top-25, the league's profile and potential bargaining power will never be higher. That still may not amount to much compared to the "big six" conferences, but if ever there was a time to push for an automatic bid to the BCS, this is the year. Even if it's only a crack, the window to lobby for Congressional intervention may be about as open as it's going to get.

Given its whiffs on those two points -- the BCS honchos easily swatted the MWC away last month, and Congress, believe it or not, has more important matters swinging for the fences at the most un-hittable target known to modern sporting man:

The Mountain West Conference has proposed a new plan for the Bowl Championship Series that includes an eight-team playoff to determine a national championship for college football and eliminates the current BCS standings based on computer rankings and human polls.

Under the new plan that would start in 2010, the standings that decide the 10 teams playing in the five BCS games would be determined by a 12-member committee consisting of one representative from the 11 Division I-A (FBS) conference and one from Notre Dame.

The Mountain West plan is essentially a standard eight-team, three-round format (the ninth and tenth-ranked teams would play each other and apparently not advance into the tournament) that retains current tie-ins for first round games, i.e. the Pac-10 and Big Ten champions would meet in the Rose Bowl, the SEC champ would go to the Sugar Bowl, etc., and on to a semifinal and championship game from there. It's a sensible, enticing plan that will be instantly, emphatically crushed by BCS tanks, lest the other serfs get ideas. As long as Jim Delany breathes, counterrevolutions must not be tolerated.

The MWC's push will fail, probably in spectacular, one-sided fashion. Since November, though, this puts the official pro-playoff count at more than a half-dozen of the nation's most prominent coaches, at least as many grandstanding Congressmen, two bills in the House of Representatives, one high-minded attorney general, the university president of the defending national champion and the president of the United States. So some day, the heroes of the Mountain West will see that wall fall.

digg delicious
more

17 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Burninator
    1. Posted by Burninator Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I've never been prouder of my conference.
    It's a pretty low bar, to be sure, but it's the truth.
  2. bobby
    2. Posted by bobby Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    it is time somebody pointed out the problems with a playoff. first who wants one the team that blew it during the year and thinks they "deserve" another chance and the non bcs schools that play teams like po dunk AK. then brag about being undefeated. not to take anything away from utah vs alabama but that was one game not a season the teams in the non bcs conf that think they are good enough and want to play for championships should think about joinig a bcs conf. the bcs conf that want to maintain things the way they are should look at the teams that are playing on thier level and bring them in. but no matter what do not try to argue that college football is the same as the nfl or basket ball show me the last time either of them went undefeated please do not try and lower the standards for college football where every loss counts and costs that is what makes college football differant and better then all other sports they have to play to win every game to get a championship
  3. bobby
    3. Posted by bobby Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    hey lets try this ideal any team that does not graduate at least 60 percent of the prev. year can not play in a bowl it would gaive more small schools a shot and get back to what college is for a education
  4. DewPower
    4. Posted by DewPower Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The proposed committee approach with bowl tie-ins is worse than the BCS idea! What happens to teams who go into their conference championship undefeated, but lose. They get shut out, when the Big East (or some other conf.) champ might have two losses already and the committee put them in because of the tie-in with the Orange Bowl.
    Better plan: 12 team playoff
    ... the 11 conf champs, plus the top ranked independent/at large (BCS ranking would work, or coach's poll plus a formula to consider RPI -- if an independent is in top12, then automatic, otherwise the top ranked at large team)
    ... cut regular season by 1 week, move conf championships up 1 week
    ... seed the tournament with the top 4 conf champs getting a bye the first week
    ... next 4 conf champs get home games vs the remaining teams
    ... round 2 the top 4 conf champs get the home games vs the winners from week 1
    ... take time off for finals
    ... play round 3 in the bowls around new year's (use the bowl tie-in of the higher ranked team in the playoff matchup -- the remaining bowls could continue, like the NIT does, with first round losers or nonplayoff teams
    ... championship game the week after new year's (like it is now)
    ... make mega bucks on the TV rights and commercials to the playoff games
    ... establish true national champion on the field
    Some extra thoughts: one team per conf would force conf like Big10 to have conf championship game (how about add ND, then the 12 team conf would HAVE TO have championship)
    also, having the bye's and the home games gives everyone something to play for beyond just their easy conf championship,
  5. jeremy
    5. Posted by jeremy Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    While I love the MWC making the push, this idea is crap. Keep the bowl tie ins? We all know that is to appease the big 10 and pac 10, but what happens in a year when USC is #! and Ohio State is #2 and they might in the first round and the lose does not advance.
    Just do a 16 team playoff with all 11 conferences getting auto bids and then 5 at large and follow the ncaa hoops selection committee. If you are an Indi (Notre Dame) either join a league or be high enough to make a case for an at large. Just cut the season by one week to play 11 regular season games and play the first two rounds in the first weeks of december the semis on new years day and the title a week after?
  6. Zachary K
    6. Posted by Zachary K Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why not have a 7-10, 8-9 preliminary round. If you're gonna let (relative) chaff in the door, make the chaff work extra hard.
  7. bobby
    7. Posted by bobby Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    the point is a playoff makes the regular season worthless, football is the only sport that to win the nat. champ you have to play hard and too win every week just winning is not good enough you have to play angainst the best teams you cannow look at what playoffs have done to every sport that has them basket ball is at half of the teams in the playoffs it does not much matter what you do during the season 500 is good enough to get in and the nfl right
  8. bobby
    8. Posted by bobby Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    if utah wants to play for a championship then play against usc, texas, ok, miami, not wyoming
  9. gtne91
    9. Posted by gtne91 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #7 - good to know that losing to Ole Miss cost Florida the national title this year.
  10. gtne91
    10. Posted by gtne91 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #8 - If you have the power to make Utah a member of the Big12 or Pac10, they WILL accept.
  11. two_smellyfeet
    11. Posted by two_smellyfeet Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    For the people who are saying that a playoff will ruin the regular season, your argument does not hold water. Teams will play just as hard to get to the playoffs as they would normally. And no teams are going to "take a game off" because they run the risk of losing ground when the teams are seeded. There have been very few instances where the top 2 teams at the end of the year were undefeated. And the current system favors teams who lose a game early in the season as opposed to losing a game later in the season. With all the scheduling differences from team to team and conference to conference, how is that fair? The BCS causes controversy more often than not. Just like with every other level of football, a playoff is the only way to determine a true champion.
  12. two_smellyfeet
    12. Posted by two_smellyfeet Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It is funny that the one person on this board still lobbying against a playoff is the one making all the incoherent posts.
    Yes, I am talking about you Robert D.
  13. jimtheg8r
    13. Posted by jimtheg8r Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    MWC = zzzzzzzzzzzz
  14. justin g
    14. Posted by justin g Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I thought the sec champion was the automatic national champion and the last game was a charity scrimmage
  15. bobby
    15. Posted by bobby Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    seems that way huh justin
  16. CuseFanInSoCal
    16. Posted by CuseFanInSoCal Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Well, the BCS title game decides the best team in college football other than USC. I thought we'd established that :).
  17. VTROG
    17. Posted by VTROG Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    what does it matter. if you guys think all your ranting is helping the cause then your living in LA LA land . there is no one on this site that knows what it is going to take to change the system unless the bcs commisioner is here . i guarantee you he is not . these rants really just show how totally out of touch you are . of course Iget a good laugh at the fools who just keep on going with no coherrant direction

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers