Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

We've certainly had our share of fun in these parts with the idea that Notre Dame might be a serious BCS contender, but for pundits taking the Irish's bid for a big-money bowl more seriously, Sports Illustrated's Cory McCartney offers a convenient (and familiar) argument in their favor -- the schedule:

Someone, whether Touchdown Jesus or the scheduling gods, has blessed the Irish with a slate tailor-made for a coach trying to regain a school's confidence and a program desperate to show the nation it still matters. The Trojans are the only forgivable loss on the schedule; that leaves 10-11 completely winnable games, more than enough to get the Irish into the mix for a BCS at-large berth. Weis' job could very well depend on such success.
[...]
If this is truly Weis' make-or-break season, he couldn't have asked for better timing. But on the off chance '09 ends with another Christmas trip to Hawaii, he might want to purchase a one-way ticket.

For a pundit, this is a good way to cover your bases, proffering some hope for the beleaguered Domers while simultaneously offering an equally convenient opening for the haters if the Irish actually pull off the job-saving turnaround ("Yeah, anybody coulda done that against Navy ..."). A nice turn.

Make no mistake: Notre Dame will have to be vastly improved to come anywhere near a BCS bowl. When ND made the Series in 2005 and 2006, it was a two-loss (9-2 in '05, 10-2 in '06), top-12 team (No. 6 in the final BCS standings in '05, No. 11 in 2006) in both seasons. And where this year's slate may not be the murderer's row (nine bowl teams, five nine-game winners) that mowed down the overmatched 2007 outfit, it's not exactly Boise-esque, either. The Irish still get seven games against teams that were in bowl games last year, not including trips to sure-to-be-improved Michigan and rapidly improving Stanford. Like McCartney, I'd guess ND enters the favorite in up to 10 games, with Michigan State and Pittsburgh falling obviously into the "toss-up" category and only Southern Cal out of reach.

But to hit the necessary 10 wins, the Irish are going to have to break a very nasty skid against winners, now at 16 losses in the last 17 games against teams that finished above .500 dating back to 2006 (the one win was last year's 27-21 edge over Navy). No number is more unforgiving to ND's decline over the last two years than that one, and no number is more foreboding to its BCS ambitions. In all likelihood, there will be nine winning teams on this year's slate, the vast majority from the "Big Six" conferences. If they can't win seven of those -- which means turning recent losses against the likes of North Carolina, Boston College and Michigan State, to say nothing avoiding another stumble against Syracuse -- there won't be any whiff of the BCS. But if the Irish are able to turn turn those borderline games into a 10-2 regular season, given that they've at least been able to avoid the outright cupcakery that's invaded most of the schedules around the country, they'll probably deserve whatever comes from it.

digg delicious
more

15 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. joe g
    1. Posted by joe g Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    bcs for them? hahaha and i'm an irish fan.
  2. Robert
    2. Posted by Robert Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Matt - Let it go . . . . Let it go
  3. PurdueMatt
    3. Posted by PurdueMatt Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:23 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    They would get drilled in a BCS game. I would enjoy watching that.
  4. Ghost of Rockne
    4. Posted by Ghost of Rockne Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:39 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Go Boilers! I'd worry more about your sorry excuse for a team than the Irish. We'll be alright. You won't make it outta the toilet bowl this year , Pal.
  5. Sean S
    5. Posted by Sean S Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:17 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    "recent losses to the likes of UConn?" They haven't played UConn, how could they lose to them? Well, it is FrontButt Weis "coaching" the team, so maybe it happened some how.
  6. CuseFanInSoCal
    6. Posted by CuseFanInSoCal Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:34 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I don't think they crack the top 8 (and autobid territory) at 10-2. If you figure a non-BCS school picking up an autobid is a pretty much sure thing, then ND is pretty much competing with the second teams from the Big 12 (likely Oklahoma or Texas [the other one likely wins the conference]), Big Ten (likely Ohio State or Penn State [the other one likely wins the conference]), Pac 10 (likely Oregon [USC likely wins the conference]), and SEC (likely Ole Miss or LSU [Florida likely wins the conference]). And I'm just not convinced ND is automatically more attractive to a bowl than these teams anymore. I'm almost sure they'd prefer Ohio State, Texas, Oklahoma, Penn State or LSU to ND, and they might well like Oregon or Mississippi more, too.
    I'd like to think the Big East could put two teams in the BCS, but unless WVU finishes second in the conference but wins 10 games (or neither ND nor any non-BCS teams qualify for autobids), that's not happening.
  7. faurocious
    7. Posted by faurocious Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:51 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I see the immature "I hate ND and fat Weis" crowd is still out in force. Get over it already. ND is what it is, and at 10-2 or 11-1, are more financially beneficial to the BCS than any other college football team for a national audience. Your immature hatred for ND is a big part of that, as you will tune in just to see them lose. Thank yourselves for making ND relevant even at 3-9. We appreciate the financial rewards that come from your stupidity.
    Continue to hate us even more, so we can add to our 7 billion dollar endowment which is steadily climbing when other college institutions are struggling to make it. I look forward to this year and next when we can add to your hate even more.
  8. JEFF P
    8. Posted by JEFF P Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Faurocious - my hatred of ND is very mature. It is fueled by people who believe ND is relevant because of the four horsemen or Rockne or even Holtz. You do realize Holtz was almost 20 years ago and that was the last time ND mattered. I know about the BCS games in '05 and '06. How did they do in those games? They got killed. Know why? Because they were overrated (as always) and did not desever to be their. ND sux. They are the most overrated team of ALL TIME. Get this through your thick golden skull. ND will never, ever be the "Football Univeristy of America" again. NEVER, EVER!!!!!!!!
    The best ND fans can hope for is to be good every now and then. They will never dominate.
    And, I AM SOOOOOOOOOOOO GLAD!!!!
  9. HERETIC
    9. Posted by HERETIC Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What notre magdalene has to do is change their school colors to red and black since
    "our lady" refers to mary magdalene. if the black is enveloping enough then their hurts won't show as badly publically. if they paractised more than prayed they might see better results since science has shown prayer to be ineffective.
  10. Seth C
    10. Posted by Seth C Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Can't see them getting into a BCS game, especially with all the other cupcake schedules (especially my team, PSU), if so it would be a sham like the one against Ohio State (fiesta). Though with a better more mature team, easier schedule, anything less than 9 wins is a failure in my opinion. This should be a good team this year. Though I'll never believe in Weis as a coach and his arrogant philosophy on play calling.
  11. CuseFanInSoCal
    11. Posted by CuseFanInSoCal Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I don't hate ND. Or like ND. Its only relevance to me in terms of football is that it's one of the few schools my Orange manged to beat last year, and I watched some of the game because Syracuse was playing and winning, not because ND was involved (given the state of Orange football, few Syracuse games are on TV in California).
    And I think it's pretty obvious that the schools that bring home the bacon for the BCS are USC, Ohio State, and Texas. To draw any other conclusion would be bizarre.
  12. William W
    12. Posted by William W Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:00 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Faurocious- couldnt have said it better myself!
    Notre Dame will always be a "bring home the bacon" school. Yes overmatched and down right whipped in the last two BCS games, but that means nothing now. If they win they will go to a BCS game. If they win big they will go to the NC. Bottom line, also the schedule isnt as easy as everyone states. How many D2 teams are on the schedule? Now check those SEC schedules. Football is often more difficult when players must attend their own classes and take their own tests for actual majors that can be applied outside of simply attaining eligabilty.
    73 days!
  13. mooka
    13. Posted by mooka Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Rather than simply say what I "think is pretty obvious", I'd like to point out the facts about the schools that "bring home the bacon." Forbes' wrote an article about the top 20 most valuable college football teams: 1 ND 2 Texas
    10 Ohio State
    12 USC (South Carolina of course)
    14 USC (Southern Cal)
    It goes without saying that the teams that bring in the most money are the ones that people are spending the most money on, and the more valuable a team that a BCS game can get at their bowl, the more money that bowl will make. So I'm "almost sure" they would not prefer Ohio State, Texas, Oklahoma, Penn State or LSU to ND, and they definitely will not like Oregon or Mississippi more, too.
    The truth is people do spend more money to see Notre Dame play football than any other team. This is why ND was in demand by many bowls last season despite a terrible, barely bowl eligible 6-6 campaign. Several of the higher bowls in the end were not able to invite ND because of binding contracts with the various conferences. It is safe to say, however, that should ND be in the BCS running this season they will likely be in high demand by BCS bowls.
    Here's the article: www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/article/116872
  14. hr209
    14. Posted by hr209 Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Headlinin-The-Revolution-will-wear-sweater-ves?urn=ncaaf,170542
    Notre Dame is still financially relevant for the BCS. I am curious, however... Notre Dame has experienced major swings in the strength of their schedule in the last four years. 2003 was difficult (eight teams or so finished in the Top 25, IIRC), 2005 and 2006 were ridiculously easy (more so in retrospect, as Pitt and Michigan were ranked to open the season in '05), 2007 was brutal, and 2009 is easy again (we think). Why does ND's strength of schedule seem to vacillate so much more wildly than other schools? Is it because of not being in a conference? Or is it just an illusion?
    Doc, I'd love for you to take a look at this and see if you can make some sense out of it.
  15. John
    15. Posted by John Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Notre Dame resembles teams from Cleveland trying to return to the glort days. I don't hate Sam Weis but I would hope he would be a tad more presentable on the sidelines. That tent he wears is very unbecoming. You have to give Irish fans a grade of A for gulability.

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers