Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

Anyone who writes a blog on any topic for pretty much any reason at all can tell you: Hitting the archives is a humbling experience. There's nothing like a three-month delay in proofreading to put one's haste and incoherence into a stark, mildly depressing focus.

But the entire Yahoo! Sports Blog clan is waxing nostalgic this week on the wit, irreverence and hangover-induced typos that defined 2008 in these parts of the Web. And though Dr. Saturday was a late addition to the crew in August and spent most of its first season chasing its metaphorical tail on a daily basis, a full season is worth at least one sober, misty look in the rearview.

That's what the bosses are telling me, anyway, so that's what you're getting, reader. You'll get the Year in Dr. Saturday, and you'll like it.

Ongoing Story of the Year. If you had to sum up the defining conflict of 2008 for posterity in one sentence, it would be something like, "45-35." That's only a shorthand for the great Texas-Oklahoma debate after the Longhorns' head-to-head win over the Sooners in the Cotton Bowl, from whence OU came roaring back to nip UT at the tape for the Big 12 South's bid to the conference championship game and, ergo, the mythical championship game. Here and elsewhere, I called the Sooners' path to the title game on Nov. 9, when OU (No. 5) was still two spots back of No. 3 Texas in the BCS:

Since the votes in this scenario would be tallied the day after Oklahoma finished off back-to-back wins over Oklahoma State and Texas Tech, the Sooners would have all the momentum. ... since the human polls are already waffling between Oklahoma and Texas despite the Longhorns' win in the Cotton Bowl, it seems the Sooners have the upper hand if they win out. As it stands, I'd peg the championship game as a collision of the winners of Alabama-Florida and Oklahoma-Texas Tech.

The best part of this debate was that it actually fostered, you know, debate: About home field advantage, the proper impact of head-to-head in the polls (or lack thereof) and how to best compare teams to one another in the first place. That, and the airplanes.

Story of the Year: Throwaway Division. Ernie Davis' anachronistic Swoosh was a good story, but the cheapest thrill for me, personally, came from the tale of Central Florida beat writers who, on a supposed conference call to George O'Leary in September, were met instead with the greeting, "Hi sexy! You've reached the live, one-on-one fantasy line."

Game of the Year. Yes, there was the thrilling finish to Texas-Texas Tech, and the seemed-great-at-the-time drama of LSU's hard-hitting win over Auburn. But, improbably, no game was as fun to watch as Auburn's epic 3 to 2 victory at Mississippi State on Sept. 13, which shamed that night's USC-Ohio State tilt for tension and caused me to wax poetic for the only time all season:

Clouds of dust, adieu
The spread, it will redeem us
So much for the script

Zeroes all alike
All shutouts, all too cliché
Two transcends sublime

Less than a month later, Tony Franklin was gone, followed by Sly Croom at year's end. May their memories live on.

Videos We Loved. I was all too happy to relive a groin-centric evening in El Paso, as well as a Duke attorney trashing Duke. But with 4,177 comments and more than 3.8 million views, Stephen Garcia and Wilbur Hackett are the undisputed champions of Doc Saturday video clips:

Yeah, not even gravity-defying Beanie Wells can beat that.

Image of the Year. With apologies to Danny Ware's mugshot, there can be only one:

Best Use of 'Hyacinth.' I would like to draw the reader's attention to Nov. 14's meditation on rejected names for the Keg of Nails Trophy in the Cincinnati-Louisville game, solely for its pioneering use of the term, "Pallet of Curs."

Quote of the Year. USC scored 41 unanswered points in a 44-10 blowout of Oregon in October, outgaining the Ducks 598 yards to 239 and holding the Oregon offense to a punt or turnover on eight straight possessions. But Duck quarterback Jeremiah Masoli isn't worried about results, man:

"We feel like we're the better team."

"Tonight they played better than us, and the score indicated that. But I still feel like we're the better team, we just gave that one away."

"We just made some mistakes that we usually don't."

"I feel like our football team is better all-around, but they played better tonight, so they got the 'W'.''

They just defeated us in every possible way for the sixth year in a row fourth time in five games, is all.

Accidental Memes of Glory. I started "ACC Championship Roulette" as a lark, really, to fill a week or two until Virginia Tech put the thing in lockdown, like always. Instead, by Halloween, I'd cycled through North Carolina, Virginia Tech, Maryland, Wake Forest, Salvador Dali, Virginia Tech again, Georgia Tech and finally Virginia. But of course, in the end, it was Virginia Tech. It's always Tech.

One Last Prayer for Washington State. The weekly Box Scorin' item regularly chronicled the Cougars' woes, which included an average deficit of 31 points; a defense that allowed at least 58 points in six different conference losses; finishing 118th out of 119 in total offense, scoring offense and scoring defense; and, most embarrassingly, an open call for a backup quarterback at midseason. Wazzu was by far the worst major conference team in modern memory ... until it cemented rival Washington's 0-13 nightmare with a last-second win in the Apple Cup. And still, it's pretty close.

More Y! Sports year of the blog posts: The Y! Sports Blogs (general), Shutdown Corner (NFL), Big League Stew (MLB), Ball Don't Lie (NBA), Puck Daddy (NHL), The Dagger (NCAAB), From the Marbles (NASCAR), Devil Ball (golf) and Cage Writer (MMA)

digg delicious
more

36 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. conor b
    1. Posted by conor b Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    FALSE! USC has not beat Oregon 6 years in a row. Oregon won the game last year at Autzen thank you very much.
  2. sdjerk
    2. Posted by sdjerk Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    A little off topic but can we go back to bowl games that really mean something? How in the explitive can there be thirtyfour freaking bowl games? Fiesta, Sugar, Cotton, Orange and Rose bowl used to have some significance but with all of the sponsored postseason games we should just call them that. A sponsored post season game. The MAGICJACK ST. PETERSBURG BOWL? I'm liking college football less and less each year. Here's my suggestion for the next new bowl game: the Nice-Try-To-Have-A-Winning-Season Bowl brought to you by Cheaters (you know, that horrible show about cheats that's on late night on FOX?). Here's my other suggestion: The-Make-It-A-BIGGER-Bowl-Than-It-Should-Be Bowl sponsored by Extense (yep, that company with the infomercials running late at night that wants you and your partner to have a bigger and better time in the sack).
    That's my rant. Peace!
    Also, I think that it sucks that my team's bowl game, er... post season game is only showing on the NFL Network.
  3. LD
    3. Posted by LD Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This has actually been one of the best bowl seasons in recent memory. At least so far. Of course, I'm saying that only because, you know, I've actually watched the games and don't merely use CFB as a fluffer in between textgasming about my fantasy team. But hey, that's just me. I'm old fashioned.
  4. stinGTime
    4. Posted by stinGTime Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @sdjerk
    So you'd like less football? No one's forcing you to watch the games. Just tune in to your "meaningful games" (Fiesta, Sugar, Cotton, Orange and Rose) and leave exciting "meaningless" games like the papajohns.com bowl and Alamo bowl to the rest of us.
    I'm no bowl system lover, but I haven't yet heard a convincing argument for having less football.
  5. oli
    5. Posted by oli Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:44 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    PAc-10 is 2 for 2 so far. I think it is real possible that it goes undefeated in the bowls. Then lets hear all these bloggers hate on how weak the PAC-10 is.
  6. Michael
    6. Posted by Michael Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I missed this part of the Year in Review....
    Dr. Saturday gets wet over Ivy League analysis that shows the actual scores of the big games are actually different. Unfortunately, for Dr. Saturday, a simple statistical analysis reveals that the differences in scores is meaningless. In other words, Dr. Saturday got wet for nothing.
    Dr. Saturday throws wood over a blog item posted in the New York Times regarding the recruiting of a high school athlete. Unfortunately, nothing in the blog post stands up to critical thinking and facts. In other words, Dr. Saturday threw wood for nothing.
    Finally, Texas stomp Oklahoma this year 45-35, holding the "vaunted" Sooner offense to under 60 points. In other words, does Dr. Saturday have any credibility? Probably as much as the New York Times.
  7. jsc
    7. Posted by jsc Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Michael, how are things in Austin?
  8. 4.0 Point Stance
    8. Posted by 4.0 Point Stance Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    No shoutout to Les Bian?
  9. Paul
    9. Posted by Paul Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:34 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    For Michael: what exactly did the Longhorns do against Tech, oh I remember trailed for most of the game, looked terrible in the first quarter, and let Tech score on the final drive, nice game plan for an aspiring Championship team. Oklahoma on the other hand thrashed the living daylights out of Tech. In a fair world Missouri would have stepped down and offered Texas the North's place in the Big 12 Champ game but life isn't fair. Besides the rules applied to Texas were the same as those applied to Oklahoma, its just the way the cookie crumbled. I thought both Texas and Oklahoma were great teams regardless of the controversy and either or indeed both deserved a chance for the BCS Championship especially when one considers Florida lost at home to a team not ranked at the time.
  10. Matt H
    10. Posted by Matt H Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Does Dr. Saturday have any credibility? Probably as much as the New York Times."
    Can I put this quote on the masthead, Michael?
  11. jimtheg8r
    11. Posted by jimtheg8r Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    At the Fiesta Bowl, I'll bet Tostitas will be serving some cheese spread to go along with Michael's whine.
  12. jimtheg8r
    12. Posted by jimtheg8r Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Oh...and "Texas stomp OU"???? What game are you talking about Michael? Yards were even, Texas trailed most of the game, etc. OU had 2 picks, that was the difference. That's as stupid as if I were to say that the Gators stomped Bama in the SEC championship game...both were great games and MUCH closer than the final score.
    And Paul, KMA on Texas/OU deserving the BCS more than the Gators because we lost to Ol Miss at home. That's like saying Texas sucks because they lost to a team that OU demolished. It just doesn't wash.
  13. Beau Bryant
    13. Posted by Beau Bryant Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You Guy's whoever you may be?????? that decide how a TEAM becomes No.1 be it College or the Pro's Need One Hell Of A better system to determining Who is No.1 and keep people Like Jerry Jones and his politics out of it. This is NOT Football as it was when I was growing up....This is What City can produce the most MONEY then that Team wins. You People Have ruined a GREAT Sport That I use to Love. My very first Game at 6 years old was in the Cotton Bowl where the Dallas Cowboys -vs- Green Bay Packers and my dad took me to see the fast man alive Bullet Bob Hayes and Dandy Don Meredith....NOW That Was Football.....Beau Bryant Mesquite, Tx.
  14. Mman22
    14. Posted by Mman22 Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:17 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ah, the pain of Longhorn fans. I love the logic, the Texas Tech loss doesn't count because...? I also love how people are saying that it is wrong that the BCS should decide a conference championship, that the tie-breaker used by the SEC is better. Let's recap that tie-breaker, in a three way tie where each team has lost to one of the other two and defeated one of the other two (plus some other tie-breakers that can't decide it) the lowest RANKED team is removed from the arguement and the winner of the head to head meeting between the other two goes to the championship game. Hmm, seems like the BCS would still determine the champion. I prefer the idea of either using point margin within the division (or common conference opponents) or how about having the coaches from the division rank the three teams 1,2,3 and using a total score to determine it. Who would have a better idea who the best team was than the coaches who had to go up against all three?
  15. Ref-n-Rhino
    15. Posted by Ref-n-Rhino Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    My Question is why did Texas Tech not get a BCS bowl Bid with only 1 loss? Another reason why the BCS is really the BS system. Nothing solved yet. Why not just have 1 v 2, 3 v 4, 5 v 6, 7 v 8, 9 v 10 in the top 5 bowls? makes sense to me, but then I'm only a true blue CFB fan with nothing to gain by all of the BS.
  16. trusme2001
    16. Posted by trusme2001 Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    hey texas fans there is no crying in football
    but but we are texas doesn,t cut it none of this would have happen
    if texas had of beat texas tech
  17. Mo
    17. Posted by Mo Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    So far this bowl season I've seen some good games between teams from different regions. It's been better, and more revealing, than a tournament that would have featured six Big 12 teams against a smattering of other teams. Based on the regular season who would have thought Oregon would beat Ok State, or the Big East would jump out to a 3-0 record? There's been some very entertaining matchups that never would have happened in a tournament format.
    A college football fan in Kansas City
  18. ROBERT G
    18. Posted by ROBERT G Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    matt hinton and your dr saturday crew,
    1. our sincere congratulations on a most excellent 1st season with many more to come, just like staurday night live.
    mele kalikimaka,
  19. felix32769
    19. Posted by felix32769 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Point taken, Mo and Sting, but you still have far more useless games in college football, and the only reason they are there is because 1) Schools need the money, and 2) Degenerate gamblers need the action.
    There were problems with the post season of college football in the past, but none stand out more since the evolution of the BCS. Yet, every year, you have some dope that supports it say "See? We got it right, again!". What a bunch of horse$hit. The AD's need to wake up and satisfy not only the teams in contention for a (mythical) national championship, but the many fans that love college football. Maybe they keep it this way so it can be debated about all year round. There isn't one person that can say Texas didn't get screwed. Aside from the billion points Oklahoma scored the last 4 games, which DOES factor in, by the way, regardless of what anyone thinks, you could make a case for any one of the three Big 12 teams to hold that spot. Two things that stand out most are the conferences that don't have a conference championship game, and the reality (not the theory) of being eliminated the later in the season you lose. I'm to the point where we should just go back to 11 years ago, and just let all of the bowls play out, and see where everyone is ranked. Couldn't be any worse.
  20. Mobius
    20. Posted by Mobius Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    How about a special bowl pitting the University of Washington (0-13) against the Detroit Lions (0-16)? They could promote it by paying people to show up....
  21. froggy logic
    21. Posted by froggy logic Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why do the 45-35 longhorns fans get to forget the 39-33 texas texas tech game??
    they try to act like the texas tech loss is a non factor. it was a 3 way tie! head to head is not a soulution.
    maybe if texas had played someone better than florida atlantic, rice, arkansas, and UTEP out of conferece they would have finished higher in the BCS! OU got many points for playing 10 win teams cincy and TCU
    i am no OU fan but i am so tired of the texas fans crying when they have no one to blame but themselves!
  22. Aline M
    22. Posted by Aline M Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:52 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I am disappointed that Okla State lost their bowl game, otherwise the Big 12 would have finished 7-0 in the bowl season. Yes, Texas Tech, Texas, (can you imagine after all of this crying them losing to Utah/) and Oklahoma will win. PAC -10 certainly held up their part of the deal. Big 10 ???? Maybe next year they won't be held in such high esteem by the BCS.
  23. Big Jim
    23. Posted by Big Jim Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    ONE MORE TIME the big ten was EXPOSED!!!! We all can see why Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany is so against a PLAYOFF. The BCS ought to make a rule, that if there is a 3 way tie or more for a chance to play in the BCS championship game then any Big Ten teams, regardless of rank, ought to be automatically elimanated based on the Big Ten being the most overrated and the worse conferance out there! How Delany got so much control over the other college commissioners is beyond me...come on you wimps get off your leather couches and get a PLAYOFF...no EXCUSES accepted!!!!!! Of course in Delany's defense, if I were HIM I wouldn't want a playoff either because the big ten would NEVER PLAY for a national championship again!!! I mean the big ten can't recruit. Think about it, what 18 year old boy would want to go where it is cold when he could go to where it was warm and there are beaches and beautiful half naked girls. The big ten can't compete with that and they know it. I mean who would pick Michigan over Gainsville? I'll tell you who...only the players who aren't good enough to play for the GATORs. All you get in Big Ten country is a cold overcrowded hateful place with fat ugly co-eds. Why I would pick So-Cal any day over Michigan or Ohio or any of those big ten schools....and I don't even like USC. NOTE TO NCAA PRESIDENTS--stop listening to Delany...if he has pictures of you in compromising positions then get some on him so we can get over this stupid mythical national championship crap and get a real football system. I DARE YOU...I TRIPLE DARE YOU...YOU POMPOUS WIMPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  24. Bleh
    24. Posted by Bleh Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Pac-10 post-season 5-0... weak conference? East coast and southern bias is another problem that could be alleviated with a playoff. Delany needs to DIAF.
  25. moleed10
    25. Posted by moleed10 Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Well I guess things are shaking out since the unranked team who beat the Gators are thrashing Tech who beat the Longhorns. I guess Ole Miss should be in the BCS game

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers