Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:16 pm EST
In addition to the "car czar" nonsense, there was another one of these anti-BCS things in Congress today, this time in the form of an actual bill, an outraged bill that would force college football into a playoff system. Three guesses which state two of the three Congressman who sponsored the bill are representing:
Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, didn’t specify what sort of playoff he wants—only that the BCS should go.
"In some years the sport’s national championship winner was left unsettled, and at least one school was left out of the many millions of dollars in revenue that accompany the title," Barton said in a statement released ahead of the bill’s introduction. "Despite repeated efforts to improve the system, the controversy rages on."
He said the bill -- being co-sponsored by Reps. Bobby Rush, an Illinois Democrat, and Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican -- "will prohibit the marketing, promotion, and advertising of a postseason game as a 'national championship' football game, unless it is the result of a playoff system. Violations of the prohibition will be treated as violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act as an unfair or deceptive act or practice."
I'm pretty sure I've written that bit about the bogus "national championship" a thousand times myself, but one lonely writer hardly represents a constituency -- a constituency which, in the cases of Barton and McCaul, just happens to be gnashing its teeth this week over the Longhorns' exclusion from the big party in Miami, and might anoint them Lonestar King and Queen for life if they came home with the BCS' scalp (or circuit boards, or whatever) in hand. "Mr. Beebe, tear down these computers! And vote for me!"
Usually these things fizzle out as vague threats, complaints or appeals to another agency to "investigate" or something. But there's always a personal motive for wielding the hammer of the state against a ridiculous but voluntary agreement among athletic conferences: Last week's BCS complaint came from Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii, who first teamed up with Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia and Idaho's Mike Simpson to investigate the Series for trade violations in April -- just a few months after Westmoreland's Bulldogs had been hopped by LSU in the final week and shut out of the championship game, which also snubbed Abercrombie's undefeated Warriors, and a little more than a year after Boise State was shut out of a chance at No. 1 despite thrilling Simpson's state with a 13-0 season and dramatic upset of Oklahoma.
What interest Bobby Rush could have in submarining the BCS, I don't know, unless he's trying to draw attention away from that other thing going on in Illinois this week. Somewhere, there's a rub: If there's one thing I trust even less than the BCS, it's a politician with a fat target and an opportunistic sense of timing.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
21 Comments
1 - 21 of 21
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
"Violations of the prohibition will be treated as violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act as an unfair or deceptive act or practice"
Gots to love it.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
BUT...
the one and only way I think you could make the BCS worse (and believe me, I think you could give the keys to a couple of stumbling-drunk fans in a bar and they'd only manage to improve it...) is to cede any control of it to the government...
Report Abuse
Heck, as a right-wing, Christian-conservative, Hawk...I might even vote for the democrat rascal if he could help pull-off a true DIV I playoff!
I mean this system of a so-called "fair" BCS system...although some schools/some conferences are treated more fairly than others, is a sham and goes against the very grain of American fairness. To ponder, on top of the mess with the B12 having three tied teams where only one can compete for the MNC, we have almost one half of all DIV I (along with the ACC and BigEast in realty) who w/o a playoff would never have a shot (fair or otherwise) at competing for the championship.
And if somehow one of the so called, mid-major Div I schools were undefeated and made into a Championship BCS game (though I don't believe this could happen no matter the circumstances) they would doubtless never be given the respect they deserve (likely given an asterisk in the historical record) as "not having played a true BCS schedule every week".
A true playoff, where all Div I is treated fairly, not just those with deeper pockets. It's good for America (would extend college football season one month)and what Americans want.
JD out
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Looking at the top 5 teams in the BCS, taking their "blowout" games, where the margin of victory was greater than 3 scores (21 pts), the 4th quarter scoring looks this way:
#1 OU outscored its opponents by 7 pts
#2 Florida = 52 pts
#3 Texas = 53 pts
#4 Alabama = 28 pts
#5 USC = 75 pts
If OU was trying to run up the score in the 4th quarter, the failed horribly! Texas Tech's coach didn't seem to feel that OU was running up the score, and in fact, voted OU #1.
USC wins the "no class" award. Of course the Pac-10 is so bad, they probably didn't have a choice.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I wasn't going to post anything here until John felt the need to bring up "running up the score". Here are THE However, please don't trust me on this ....look up the facts yourself before you post your rant!!!
Looking at the top 5 teams in the BCS, taking their "blowout" games, where the margin of victory was greater than 3 scores (21 pts), the 4th quarter scoring looks this way:
#1 OU outscored its opponents by 7 pts
#2 Florida = 52 pts
#3 Texas = 53 pts
#4 Alabama = 28 pts
#5 USC = 75 pts
If OU was trying to run up the score in the 4th quarter, the failed horribly! Texas Tech's coach didn't seem to feel that OU was running up the score, and in fact, voted OU #1.
USC wins the "no class" award. Of course the Pac-10 is so bad, they probably didn't have a choice.
I don't know where you got your "facts" about Florida...but in their "blowout games" they outscored their opponents 87-39 however, in the Arkansas game it was 17-7 at the end of the 3rd quarter and they scored 21 in the 4th to break open a close game. Second, against LSU, one of their TDs came on an interception returned for a TD. Third, the 1st stringers (including Tebow) were on the bench somewhere between the middle of the 2nd quarter (Citadel) and the beginning of the 4th quarter, so most of those scores were from backups...hardly trying to "run up the score". Finally, against Georgia, Meyer may have been trying to run up the score, but only as revenge for what Georgia did to us last year with the end zone celebration (COMPLETELY UNSPORTSMANLIKE). So before you spout off ridiculous facts, you better check them.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
You are big and stupid...Good luck getting a share of the title now....
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 21 of 21