Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

In addition to the "car czar" nonsense, there was another one of these anti-BCS things in Congress today, this time in the form of an actual bill, an outraged bill that would force college football into a playoff system. Three guesses which state two of the three Congressman who sponsored the bill are representing:

Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, didn’t specify what sort of playoff he wants—only that the BCS should go.

"In some years the sport’s national championship winner was left unsettled, and at least one school was left out of the many millions of dollars in revenue that accompany the title," Barton said in a statement released ahead of the bill’s introduction. "Despite repeated efforts to improve the system, the controversy rages on."

He said the bill -- being co-sponsored by Reps. Bobby Rush, an Illinois Democrat, and Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican -- "will prohibit the marketing, promotion, and advertising of a postseason game as a 'national championship' football game, unless it is the result of a playoff system. Violations of the prohibition will be treated as violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act as an unfair or deceptive act or practice."

I'm pretty sure I've written that bit about the bogus "national championship" a thousand times myself, but one lonely writer hardly represents a constituency -- a constituency which, in the cases of Barton and McCaul, just happens to be gnashing its teeth this week over the Longhorns' exclusion from the big party in Miami, and might anoint them Lonestar King and Queen for life if they came home with the BCS' scalp (or circuit boards, or whatever) in hand. "Mr. Beebe, tear down these computers! And vote for me!"

Usually these things fizzle out as vague threats, complaints or appeals to another agency to "investigate" or something. But there's always a personal motive for wielding the hammer of the state against a ridiculous but voluntary agreement among athletic conferences: Last week's BCS complaint came from Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii, who first teamed up with Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia and Idaho's Mike Simpson to investigate the Series for trade violations in April -- just a few months after Westmoreland's Bulldogs had been hopped by LSU in the final week and shut out of the championship game, which also snubbed Abercrombie's undefeated Warriors, and a little more than a year after Boise State was shut out of a chance at No. 1 despite thrilling Simpson's state with a 13-0 season and dramatic upset of Oklahoma.

What interest Bobby Rush could have in submarining the BCS, I don't know, unless he's trying to draw attention away from that other thing going on in Illinois this week. Somewhere, there's a rub: If there's one thing I trust even less than the BCS, it's a politician with a fat target and an opportunistic sense of timing.

digg delicious
more

21 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Peachy
    1. Posted by Peachy Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bobby Rush? Bobby Rush?!? His district is on the south side, starting about two blocks from where I sit right now - he's not even in the catchment zone of Northwestern, for pity's sake. (Indeed, most of the UofC is within the 1st... and as a university we haven't cared about D-IA football since we bulldozed Stagg Field to build a library mid-century.)
  2. JustWinBaby
    2. Posted by JustWinBaby Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    First. I know that it is the third slot but that is not fair. Posting first shouldn't get you the top slot. We need a way to vote for the first comment. A way that allows people on the east coast to have a strong vote and west coast people get no vote at all. You may be first in the AP, but my computer ranking gives me the 3 way tie braker.
    "Violations of the prohibition will be treated as violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act as an unfair or deceptive act or practice"
    Gots to love it.
  3. Jimmy J
    3. Posted by Jimmy J Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Justwin...LOL! id you graduate from the University Of Whiners...I mean Texas? The motto down there is..if at first you dont succeed..legislate yourself a spot. I'm all for a playoff.dont get me wrong,but all this whining and crying down in Austin hs gotten on my last nerve. Graham Harrell..left out of the Heisman consideration...not that he had a snowballs chance of winning it..but evidently he wasnt even invited to NYC. I guess Colt Brennan used up the only "feel good candidate" slot last year. Now we are back to reality. You have to be from one of the "IN" schools to get consideration. Like I said..he wasnt going to win it even if he was invited to NYC...but perhaps the extra publicity would have helped him with the NFL scouts. But I suppose the NFL is only interested in young men who are prone to committing felonies these days anyway..which is why 99% of heisman trophy winners dont make it in the NFL..maybe Graham should go rip a purse off of some ladies arm...maybe that would get him drafted (j/k)
  4. bigtexbd
    4. Posted by bigtexbd Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Just so you know, Barton is a Texas A&M Aggie. He has bigger worries than UT.
  5. bigtexbd
    5. Posted by bigtexbd Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Also, McCaul didn't attend UT, but he does live in Austin. Can't blame him for trying to please his constituency.
  6. SnowedIn'Bama
    6. Posted by SnowedIn'Bama Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Texas should not be complaining. They agreed to the Big12 tiebreaker system, which included the BCS rankings at the bottom of the lsit. And, by the BCS, which Texas agreed to, the Horns didn't get to play for their conference title. And if you don't win your conference, you shouldn't be playing for a NC, plain and simple. Get over it. last I checked, when auburn got left out, barton and his gang weren't too upset.
  7. briggo
    7. Posted by briggo Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Do they realize that the BCS Championship Game is a playoff with two teams?
  8. John
    8. Posted by John Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I fail to see why you need to keep a starting QB and other starters in a game that youre winning by 35pts... Texas has class they pull most of the starters out... no wonder OU has all the 60pt games, they leave the starters in the WHOLE GAME.... "NO CLASS AT ALL" Why run the score up over and over and over just to build numbers..... get rid of this... this is a sport, show some sportmanship........ WHAT A JOKE OU with all their big numbers... LOL
  9. Robert T
    9. Posted by Robert T Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    oh, and by the way... I take a back seat to nobody in my loathing of the BCS - they took a horrible system and managed to make it worse (now every other bowl game is that much more meaningless...). And the college presidents and conference powers pushing the system remind me of major league baseball owners a half-generation ago - so confident the greatness of the game itself would it bulletproof even to their massive ineptitude - and now they're presiding over a sport nobody can muster up any passion for at all...
    BUT...
    the one and only way I think you could make the BCS worse (and believe me, I think you could give the keys to a couple of stumbling-drunk fans in a bar and they'd only manage to improve it...) is to cede any control of it to the government...
  10. JDH4USM
    10. Posted by JDH4USM Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:31 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It strikes me that this proposed bill, at this time in our nation's history, with the president-elect publicly stating on several diferent occassions that he would like to end the BCS and initiate some form of a Div I NCAA championship playoff, finally has more than a snowball's chance in hell of gaining traction.
    Heck, as a right-wing, Christian-conservative, Hawk...I might even vote for the democrat rascal if he could help pull-off a true DIV I playoff!
    I mean this system of a so-called "fair" BCS system...although some schools/some conferences are treated more fairly than others, is a sham and goes against the very grain of American fairness. To ponder, on top of the mess with the B12 having three tied teams where only one can compete for the MNC, we have almost one half of all DIV I (along with the ACC and BigEast in realty) who w/o a playoff would never have a shot (fair or otherwise) at competing for the championship.
    And if somehow one of the so called, mid-major Div I schools were undefeated and made into a Championship BCS game (though I don't believe this could happen no matter the circumstances) they would doubtless never be given the respect they deserve (likely given an asterisk in the historical record) as "not having played a true BCS schedule every week".
    A true playoff, where all Div I is treated fairly, not just those with deeper pockets. It's good for America (would extend college football season one month)and what Americans want.
    JD out
  11. mikez34
    11. Posted by mikez34 Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    There are 119 teams in 11 confrences. How can you possibly have a national champion? Even with a 16 team playoff you will still be arguing over who deserves to be in the playoff. Win your conference, win your bowl game, and if the writers decide you are "national champion" then great, if not oh well you won your conference and that is a good year.
  12. Ed
    12. Posted by Ed Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I agree with SnowedinBama regarding UT didn't complain at the beginning of the season about the tiebreaker for the Big 12 championship. Now, it sounds like whinning (because it IS). Also, I sure didn't hear UT players/coaches/fans complain when UT beat OU and jumped from #5 to #1 in the polls jumping over an idle Alabama. I guess it's ok to say the system is fair when you are winning. Shame on UT. Grow up and join the real world. Now we have TX Congressmen trying to legislate UT into the championship. OMG, don't we have more pressing issues to discuss. This is ridiculous. Oh... and for those who think I'm biased, I don't like A&M, TxTech, Alabama, nor Florida either.... I just see this as a pathetic attempt by spoiled and arrogant people to get their way at the expense of following the rules. Such cry-babies.... If you don't like the rules, get out or get them changed. Quit crying about it being unfair. You knew the rules when the season started.
  13. Jimmy J
    13. Posted by Jimmy J Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Livin-in-tx...BINGO. If the tie had been between OU,TTU,and TCU (hypothetically) there would be nothing being said in Austin..no legislator would even care what had happened. But since it was THE University if Texas that got snubbed...someone HAS to do something to assure it never happens again. Texas Tech is the fly in the oinment in this mess....Tech is not SUPPOSE to be able to go 11-1. No one in Austin is asking why Tech was snubbed in the process (a 44 point loss is a great hint I'll admit) The Heisman snub for Harrell AND Crabtree...is there a State Rep in Austin asking for an investigation in that issue as well?. Nope..because the system Tech runs produces the wild numbers...no right thinking sports writer or voter would DARE give a Tech player any respect due to the system they run...which..coincidentally is the same system OU's offense is based on. Its an offense Leach installed at OU while he was there..although it has been adjusted and watered down a tad..its the same base system. I still say the offense run by the New England Patriots is highly similar to the offense run in Lubbock..but it has to be the system that produces those numbers..those kids simply CANNOT have THAT much talent. The Heisman is a joke folks..Reggie Bush seems to have adjusted to the NFL laifestyle (lthough hurt) but what other heisman winner has amounted to anything in the NFL thae past 15 years? Leinart?Benched in favor of a guy whose underwear is dusty (by NFL standards anyway). Vince Young (not a winner but touted for the award) same thing..benched for a guy whose undies are almost as dusty. The BCS and Heisman processes are nothing but political games won by those that are SUPPOSE to win..the only problem this year was that too many teams that were SUPPOSE to be there qualified...plus one team that was not SUPPOSE to be there. The system melted down...literally and we all got to see how the decisions are made. OU HAD to be the pick to go for it all..based on the argument UT was TRYING to use to leverage their way in..UT couldnt get "PICKED" to go to Kansas City because their 6 point loss in Lubbock trumped their 10 point win in Dallas and Tech's butt whoopin in Norman made it VERY easy for the powers to be to make a decision..and I am sure they all breathed a HUGE sigh of relief because..again..Tech is not SUPPOSE to be there (and in all honesty didnt deserve to be there after that 44 point loss) but the argument was left wide open after beating UT in Lubbock. The politics need to be removed from the NCAA..but it never will. I really hope Tech is strong next year..if Leach returns he should have Potts firing the ball like a wild man in no time at all..just so Tech can ruin the party again next year..UT will beat Tech next year because the game wil be in Austin (the difference between the chicken and the pig deal again) but OU has to come to Lubbock..and the last 2 times OU came to Lubbock..they lost...so it is possible to have the same issueagain this time next year..I hope it happens again. The tie breaker rule will be changed for sure..but it is still possible for Tech to ruin the season for one of the two "chosen" ones.
  14. Dingus
    14. Posted by Dingus Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I wasn't going to post anything here until John felt the need to bring up "running up the score". Here are THE FACTS. However, please don't trust me on this ....look up the facts yourself before you post your rant!!!
    Looking at the top 5 teams in the BCS, taking their "blowout" games, where the margin of victory was greater than 3 scores (21 pts), the 4th quarter scoring looks this way:
    #1 OU outscored its opponents by 7 pts
    #2 Florida = 52 pts
    #3 Texas = 53 pts
    #4 Alabama = 28 pts
    #5 USC = 75 pts
    If OU was trying to run up the score in the 4th quarter, the failed horribly! Texas Tech's coach didn't seem to feel that OU was running up the score, and in fact, voted OU #1.
    USC wins the "no class" award. Of course the Pac-10 is so bad, they probably didn't have a choice.
  15. bogey
    15. Posted by bogey Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #9 - ...and "the JOKE with all their big numbers" will be playing in the NC. Where will the 'horns be playing? LOL
  16. Kevin
    16. Posted by Kevin Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Is our congress this stupid? Do they not understand that they should be passing laws to protect the constitution and its citizens. This guy is full of crap. I can see congress urging the NCAA to change but that is it. He makes my new home state and UT look like whimps. They whined to get into the Rose Bowl a few years ago. Enough! Glad I am a Buckeye first and Longhorn 2nd
  17. Joshgator
    17. Posted by Joshgator Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    15. Posted by SoonerBob Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:44 pm EST Report Abuse
    I wasn't going to post anything here until John felt the need to bring up "running up the score". Here are THE However, please don't trust me on this ....look up the facts yourself before you post your rant!!!
    Looking at the top 5 teams in the BCS, taking their "blowout" games, where the margin of victory was greater than 3 scores (21 pts), the 4th quarter scoring looks this way:
    #1 OU outscored its opponents by 7 pts
    #2 Florida = 52 pts
    #3 Texas = 53 pts
    #4 Alabama = 28 pts
    #5 USC = 75 pts
    If OU was trying to run up the score in the 4th quarter, the failed horribly! Texas Tech's coach didn't seem to feel that OU was running up the score, and in fact, voted OU #1.
    USC wins the "no class" award. Of course the Pac-10 is so bad, they probably didn't have a choice.
    I don't know where you got your "facts" about Florida...but in their "blowout games" they outscored their opponents 87-39 however, in the Arkansas game it was 17-7 at the end of the 3rd quarter and they scored 21 in the 4th to break open a close game. Second, against LSU, one of their TDs came on an interception returned for a TD. Third, the 1st stringers (including Tebow) were on the bench somewhere between the middle of the 2nd quarter (Citadel) and the beginning of the 4th quarter, so most of those scores were from backups...hardly trying to "run up the score". Finally, against Georgia, Meyer may have been trying to run up the score, but only as revenge for what Georgia did to us last year with the end zone celebration (COMPLETELY UNSPORTSMANLIKE). So before you spout off ridiculous facts, you better check them.
  18. Joshgator
    18. Posted by Joshgator Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    BTW....that should read "they outcored their opponents 87-39 [IN THE 4th QUARTER]
  19. Michael S
    19. Posted by Michael S Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Dear Texas,
    You are big and stupid...Good luck getting a share of the title now....
  20. ltownokie
    20. Posted by ltownokie Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    OU is there you are not (besides Flordia) thats all cry me a river UT. have a Merry Christmas
  21. Steve McGarrett
    21. Posted by Steve McGarrett Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wow... is this how we need to solve the BCS; get the government involved? We'll see a headline like: "BCS DECLARES GERMANY WINNER OF WORLD WAR II... US Finishes Ranked 4th" if that happens.

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers