Sat Nov 08, 2008 11:29 pm EST

Texas Tech 56, Oklahoma State 20. You can throw around a lot of superlatives about Texas Tech's offense, but if you didn't see the gears turning like fine clockwork against Oklahoma State, Shakespeare couldn't describe the consistency, precision and general ESP between Mike Leach, Graham Harrell and his squadron of receivers more eloquently than this:

Oklahoma State threw the book at Harrell, and literally didn't come close to him -- he wasn't sacked, wasn't flustered, and found his receivers wide open more than 80 percent of the time, exactly when and where they were supposed to be there. He was right virtually every time. For the second week in a row, a competent defense on a top-10 team was made to look like SMU or Eastern Washington or some patsy, neither of which gave up as many yards or points as the Cowboys. This was not the encore of an upstart.
I suppose some skeptics will still use the logo on the side of the helmet as an excuse for cynicism about the "the system" or the defense or Big 12 defenses in general, for the sake of hating. But there's only one possible way to even begin to slow this offense down, and that's to get in the receivers' faces, play man-to-man and pray your men are good enough. Texas' men weren't good enough; Oklahoma State's weren't even close. Maybe Oklahoma has a fighting chance in two weeks, with the way the Sooners' offense is humming on the other side. But I'm beginning to prefer Leach, Harrell and Crabtree to divine intervention.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
39 Comments
1 - 25 of 39
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And when the NC game comes into the picture, the winner of the SEC will be KING once again, because they can play
defense.
Report Abuse
When people say the SEC plays defense, those people are simply ignorant of what offense looks like.
Caption to the Harrell photo: "Yes, I am a douche. Thanks for asking"
Report Abuse
Tech's Oline and Dline is better than OUs. That usually makes the difference in these affairs.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Damn they were fun to watch last night. Harrell looked at times like he was knew that he could not be sacked, and he was toying with OSU, especially on the goal line when he pulled all the shenanigans before going under center, taking 3 steps back and throwing the perfect fade to Crabtree - shades of Peyton Manning in his prime. A lot is made of Crabtree and he is All-American caliber but Tech's receiver corps is so good and so deep and they complement each other well that you can't focus on Crabtree like Tech did on Dez Bryant. But if Tech beats OU it will be because of their O-line. Scary to look at and scary good. OU will score more than OSU's 20 points but they may need 50 or more to win.
I am a UT fan first but Tech is a close second, I used to live in Lubbock and despite having a degree from UT have actually been to more Tech games. I can only imagine the atmosphere there the last 2 weeks. Whatever happens in Norman in 2 weeks, this is a breakthrough year for Tech. If Tech beats OU then Harrell should start making room at his parents' house for a nice new trophy. Jimmy J, you guys enjoy your day in the sun. Harrell and Crabtree will be gone but with Leach and McNeil there the program is in good hands, and Leach is just the kind of guy that would rather stay there and be king for life than get lured away by more money.
And I hope Alabama wins the SEC, because I think Leach actually prefers being No. 2 in the polls, except the last one of course.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Naturally, the Big 12 offenses are good enough to skew the defenseive stats in this conference. However, when you remove the elite clubs of the conference from the equation, it becomes evident that Big 21 defenses are sub-par. For example, Ou has allowed the point totals against teams that are NOT TT, UT, Okie St., or Mizzou in its last 3 games: 28, 28, 35.
Likewise, Okie State was horrible-no pass rush, lack of speed in the secondary, and overall inept. The SEC, converesely, fields 5 of the top 25 defenses in the Country. It is fair to say that T.Tech would not put up the video game #'s against most SEC units, including SEC afterthoughts, South Carolina, LSU, and Auburn (not to mention 'Bama and UF). The difference between the 2 conferences is in the line of scrimmage, as I believe UF or Bama could pressure Harrel/Bradfor/McCoy. Naturally, when they fail, the Big 12 offenses will make them pay.
Irrespective, if OU wins in 2 week the point becomes moot because it pushes UT into the title game.
Also of relevance is that as strong as the Big 12 South is this year (which is very), the North ihas been commensurately weak. This means the Big 12 title game should be a wholly 1-sided affair which in turn means that the Big 12 South winner is the de facto representative of the conference in the BCS. As such, there are no relistic hopes for the 2 teams that miss out on the title shot, which really is unforttunate because a TT/UT ot UT/OU rematch would be tremendous.
All told, Florida appears to be a much more complete team that any of the Big 12 juggernauts right now-but not so much better that they would be a presumptive favorite over any of the Big 3 of the Big 12.
Final thought-Okie St. caught UT in a perfect situation, which likely made that game much closer than it would otherwise would have been. After watching Okie St. last night, it is evident that they do not have the top-to-bottom athletes necessary to defeat any of the top 5 teams (the 3 Big 12 behemoths and the 2 SEC elite).
Report Abuse
You gotta have playmakers and score early and often. This isn't 1970's Texas vs. Notre Dame or Ohio St vs. Michigan anymore. By that yardstick, it's Florida clearly from the SEC and whoever wins the Big 12 South. And as I mentioned, Tech could get bailed out even after losing to OU. Don't forget, out of the top 4 in the Big 12 South, who have only lost games to one of the others, OU is the only one that hasn't played more than one of the other 3 to date, and they lost to UT at a neutral site.
It is OK, keep on talking trash about how Tech isn't worthy. They thrive on it.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Scenario 1: Tech beats OU. No tiebreaker needed (unless they fall to Baylor, and since they beat UT they win it anyway).
Scenario 2: OU beats Tech and OSU, Tech beats Baylor, UT wins out. Three way tie which I heard is broken by the BCS rankings - is that still so?. I don't have a vote there, but I would vote for UT in that case since their only loss was in the Jones snakepit on a near miracle play after making a heroic comeback after playing OU, Missouri, and OSU in successive games - quite a gauntlet to run. OU's only loss would have been after getting knocked out in crunch time to UT, a 14-point loss at a neutral site. Big difference. Since Tech would have lost last and they are the new kids on the block they have no chance.
Scenario 3 (not implausible at all!): Tech loses to OU and beats Baylor, OU then loses to OSU in Stillwater and UT wins out. Then you have your 2-way tie which Tech wins based on head to head.
All other scenarios aren't even considered since I can't picture Texas losing to Kansas or A&M (not this year, the Aggies are looking like a sorry lot and UT has to be sick of them). UT is in the mix no matter what.
Correct me if I am wrong about the 3-way tiebreaker.
Disagree about Colt. If OU beats Tech McCoy gets my vote for the Heisman. He doesn't have the recieivers, O-line or even running game that Tech has. Tech popped him good and he got up and did everything you could ask to beat them. If Tech beats OU Harrell gets it hands down.
Another BCS championship scenario: Opposing QB's both have Heisman Trophies. The media will be so excited they will have to wear Depends. That will be a first. Any game not between a Big 12 team and an SEC team would be a travesty.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Bring on the competition. Go Raiders.
Report Abuse
First, they had 6 of the Big12 schools in the top 20 more than any other conference!
Second, at least 4-5 of them were in the Big 12 south and 4-5 of them have been in the top 10 all season!
So to me they have the strength of schedule!
Now where in timbucktoo do they get off trying to put these other schools up there!
It took an overtime for Alabama to win
Florida lost to Mississippi which was and still is an unranked team
The only reason USC is getting so much hype now is there are more writers in California that can vote!
Report Abuse
The people who continue to say the Big 12 has no defense, reality check. The SEC has no offense. Florida aside, the SEC is not all that good this year. Sorry, guys. Tennessee lost to Wyoming. How many good teams does the SEC have? Florida is great, Alabama is pretty good. That's it. Better luck next year.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 39