Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

Thu Oct 16, 2008 11:25 pm EDT

TCU takes BYU's exposure to heart

TCU 32, BYU 7. When I referred to BYU's inflated ranking, it was a reference to the Cougars' schedule through the first six games, not their actual abilities. I expected, right alongside the optimists who lifted the Y into the top 10 for trouncing UCLA and surviving Washington, that its first opportunity against a respectable outfit like TCU would be a validation, not an exposure.

So much for "The Quest" and all that. Not only was TCU's legitimately killer defense validated at the Cougars' expense, but the nondescript Frog offense made BYU's heretofore solid D look slow and lost. That's an all-around butt-kicking. How many times can a wide receiver standing by himself in the shotgun, with basically no hope of attempting a successful pass downfield, take off for a first down? In Jerome Kerley's case, eight times, for 70 yards and a too-easy touchdown. Andy Dalton had his highest pass efficiency rating of the season against a team not named 'Stephen F. Austin.'

This is not exactly an upset -- TCU has made kind of a habit of big seasons under Gary Patterson and might have been a slight favorite at home, objectively. A rout, though, was not in the cards for BYU, in one of its two real chances (the other set up later against Utah, an intriguing rivalry game that just lost most of whatever sizzle it was generating) to make a move against another top 25 caliber outfit. Whatever the Cougars do from here on out to Colorado State and UNLV and the like, it ends in another Las Vegas Bowl (fourth in a row!), at best.

The 'BCS Buster' thing is Utah's scene now, or Boise State's, or maybe Ball State's, if the Utes and Broncos fall by the wayside. TCU is good enough, obviously, maybe the best of the bunch, but that'll teach 'em to schedule Oklahoma in September. Make that Kansas State instead, and the Frogs are looking into rooms in Tempe right now. Oh well -- they'll just have to settle for ending an 18-game conference win streak in dominant fashion, I guess.

digg delicious
more

7 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Alaska Hokie
    1. Posted by Alaska Hokie Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Thursday nights are becoming extremely dangerous for ranked teams. Except for last week and the third week of the season, we've seen a ranked (or favored) team go down on Thursday night. And in the third week, we saw it happen on Friday night instead. If you're a high-ranked team that already has national publicity, what's the advantage of playing on Thursday night? If I were AD of USC or some other perennial BCS contender, I wouldn't touch weekday away games with a ten-foot poll. You're already getting overwhelming publicity, and any potential gain in profile is massively offset by the possibility of a loss in such an enthusiastic environment.
  2. sodahq
    2. Posted by sodahq Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Although Tulsa's played by far the weakest schedule of any FBS team so far, they can't be entirely discounted as BCS contenders.
  3. baller13zg
    3. Posted by baller13zg Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    no thursday night games ever again. thursdays should not be allowed to have ranked teams. it's bad news.
  4. J Tin
    4. Posted by J Tin Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm glad to see byu go down in flames. It'slooking more and more like boise st in 2006 was a fluke, and the real quality of non-bcs conference champs is just not that high. see Hawaii, ca. 2007 Espn talking heads were even throwing around the (remote) possibilty of byu in the title game earlier this week on the cfb podcast - i think it was pat forde. I'm not against the general principal of letting a mid-major into the bcs system, but please, let these teams prove themselves before annointing them the next boise st. I realize this is partially a chicken-egg problem, as many major schools don't want to schedule them - kudos to oklahoma and tcu for playing earlier.
  5. y_not_garrekk
    5. Posted by y_not_garrekk Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    gimme a break..doesn't matter what "night" a team plays..if they've come in ready for war..they will win.
  6. RICK A
    6. Posted by RICK A Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I live in Salt Lake, and I'm sorry to say BYU is not in the top 10 nor the top 25. What a joke.
  7. saturdaynitelights.com
    7. Posted by saturdaynitelights.com Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Like most, I was shocked by the margin of victory but even more so by the apparent discrepancy of speed and talent. BYU failed in a colossal way the so-called "eyeball test"-used by every mediocre pundit in support of his (or her) decree that USC is invincible earlier in the year-which in BYU's case revealed a collective lack of power, athleticism, speed and depth. In fact, BYU didn't look that much better than the intra-mural championship team I played on in undergrad.
    Not sure if BYU's evident lack of legitimate D-1 talent should be used as an indictment of mid-major football, but it is certainly another piece of evidence in the mounting case against a mid-major ever playing in the BCS title game.
    Saturday Nite Lights

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers