Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:22 pm EDT

Reorientation: 'Bama digs the long ball

Adjusting to the weekend's new realities.

McElroy goes deep. The question about Alabama's national championship credentials coming into the season was the passing game: 'Bama clearly had the defense, the running game and maybe the best all-around receiver in the SEC, but could it get over the hump against Florida or survive another undefeated regular season with another lo-fi, within-the-offense type under center?

Every assumption painted Greg McElroy as the cliché, "just ask him not to lose the game" kind of passer in a paleolithic, run-based attack, but he's hardly been that: McElroy is not only third nationally (and best in the SEC) in efficiency, but also ranks third in yards per attempt, and is averaging just shy of 15 yards per completion. He's already completed nine passes of 25 yards or longer, a couple more than Tim Tebow, including 35 and 48-yard bombs against Virginia Tech and strikes covering 32, 50 and 80 yards Saturday at Arkansas -- considerably out-slinging much-feted Arkansas gunslinger Ryan Mallett, who crashed back to earth after a monster effort last week against Georgia: The Razorbacks' longest completion against the Tide covered just 25 yards. Four different 'Bama receivers are averaging more than 17 yards per catch on at least seven receptions, only one of whom is named Julio Jones.

In fact, if there's one thing missing from the legitimately run-heavy Gator offense, it's a bona fide deep threat in the wake of Percy Harvin's early exit. In that sense, 'Bama has the more balanced attack right now, and the top-10 numbers in total and scoring offense to prove it.

... but Terrelle Pryor does not. Jim Tressel was mercilessly slammed for his usual close-to-the-sweatervest game plan against USC, and seemed to respond with a little flex for the critics last week, when Terrelle Pryor had career highs in pass attempts and yards, threw three touchdowns (along with two interceptions) and put up another 100-plus rushing in an easy, 38-0 rout over Toledo. Saturday's 30-0 win over Illinois was just as easy, but not nearly as progressive with Pryor: Not only did the sophomore phenom not complete a pass in the first half, but he barely attempted any -- Pryor's first two throws fell incomplete on the Buckeyes' opening possession, and he didn't put the ball in the air again until the third quarter, by which time OSU led 13-0 and was in no danger of being surprised by the flailing Illini offense.

It was the opposite of the usual script -- throwing to keep the score down, though it failed there, too, when Pryor hit a late, meaningless touchdown in the final two minutes -- and a reversal of what had looked like a tantalizing willingness to set Pryor free after coming up short against the Trojans.

Reverting to status quo in Miami. So it turns out pretty much anybody can burn Florida State's secondary for big plays on a fairly consistent basis right now, which -- along with the downpour in Blacksburg -- helps explain why this supposedly revamped edition of Miami looked so much like its terminally mediocre predecessors against Virginia Tech. The Hokies slugged the 'Canes to reassert their grip on the Coastal Division, certainly, but it looked like someone had replaced Mark Whipple's heretofore excellent playbook with the milquetoast stylings of Patrick Nix: Icy Jacory Harris looked flustered and inaccurate, and the chronic case of butterfingers flared up again after sure-handed efforts by the receivers against FSU and Georgia Tech.

The win over the Yellow Jackets remains impressive, especially given Tech's thorough handling of North Carolina's offense in a 24-7 rebound win, but combine a close win over still-mediocre Florida State with a putrid egg in Blacksburg, and Miami is indeed "back," to the same "wait-and-see" fringes it's occupied for most of the last three years.

Oregon's offense is Alive! Still, even Miami didn't do as much to set back its early success Saturday as California, which ran head first into a chainsaw-wielding offense that found its motor just in time for Pac-10 play. The Bears came in expecting the pedestrian unit they'd seen on film against Boise State, Purdue and Utah, and were ambushed by the one that ended last year on a tear:

In one week, Jeremiah Masoli careened from 4-of-16 with an interception and no touchdowns against Utah to 21-of-25 with three touchdowns to no picks against a secondary that returned every starter from 2008, and the Ducks added another 236 on the ground against a veteran front that ranked in the top 10 nationally against the run coming in. That level of domination -- especially the defense's utter dismantling of the Bears' top-10 offense -- would have strained credulity even given the momentum at the end of last season and the high expectations coming into this one; after the first three games, it completely defies the time-progress continuum. Has to be the uniforms.

digg delicious
more

18 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Big Tony
    1. Posted by Big Tony Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Matt,
    I generally read your Posts at least once per day because i enjoy your take on college football. I am a fan of Ohio State but i am not one of those fans that knows nothing about the game and thinks his team is great and should always win no matter what. I am a under 30 former small college football player who has gotten his share of perspective about the game of football over the years from actually playing the game, (unlike most of the people who post on here.) My one question about your column today is why you choose to blast Tressell and Pryor of OSU when there was a reason OSU chose not to throw the football early and until after the half this past saturday. It was raining cats and dogs and the run was working. If you did see the game and still made these comments, then i am confused. After the rain stopped Tressell opened back up the offense and things were still clicking. Just an observation from one of the sane and smarter buckeye fans.
  2. spencerO96
    2. Posted by spencerO96 Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    so it's tressel and pryor's fault that they didn't throw in torrential rain?
    got it.
  3. Jason
    3. Posted by Jason Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Seriously... I love your blog and I'm not a blind Buckeye homer, but you got this one wrong. Your criticism of the team has been valid at times in the past. But I encourage you to watch the game next time instead of reading the box score. The 1st half was played in a complete rainstorm. Brandon Saine, who should be starting over Dan Herron in my opinion, was _averaging_ 10 yards per carry in the 1st half. Yea, let's air it out, Tress! This 10 yards and a cloud of dust is clearly bad offensive strategy. And these runs were nearly consecutive. Late 1st quarter/Early 2nd quarter... Go watch the tape again.
  4. ouchthatssharp
    4. Posted by ouchthatssharp Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    How about giving some credit to the Ohio State offensive line for having their way with the Illinois defense when they knew they were going to run the ball. The rain was terrible in the first half and why risk turning the ball over through the air when you have the ground game that was doing such a great job? Give credit where credit is due. The Ohio State offensive line showed up and pushed the Illini around Ohio Stadium. Oh, and Illinois, probably not a good idea to try to dance on the Block O before the game. It might just fire the entire team up and lead to them putting a severe beatdown on you.
  5. Jeff K
    5. Posted by Jeff K Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ohio State fans,
    Your team will be unfairly criticized and incorrectly characterized until they win a big out-of-conference game. Period. Get used to it. Quit whining about it.
  6. J Tin
    6. Posted by J Tin Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Jeff,
    Pouring-down rainstorm has nothing to do with OSU's ability (or lack thereof) to win a big OOC game. The other commenters are simply giving another explanation as to why OSU went ultra-conservative in the 1st half. Nobody I know who actually watched this game was "whining" about the playcalling - it made sense based on the awful weather.
    To the author here - keep up the great work. This is the best blog on the intertubes, and I'll be back for more tomorrow.
  7. spencerO96
    7. Posted by spencerO96 Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    jeff k...is there a statute of limitations we should know about jeff k? because the last "big OOC win" happened all the way back in 2006. i know 3 years is a distant memory, but perhaps you should pull your head out of your a$$ and not be such a condescending, melodramatic d-bag.
  8. Matt H
    8. Posted by Matt H Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It's not a "blast," just an observation. OSU had a different style of play this week than last week, and won with 30-plus-point shutouts on both occasions. The points is that they might have expected to be less conservative based on the Toledo game, certainly not that conservatism was ineffective (obviously it wasn't). Why the defensiveness about a win described as "easy"?
  9. PurdueMatt
    9. Posted by PurdueMatt Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Matt Hinton didn't know that it was raining cats and dogs in Columbus on Saturday.
  10. spencerO96
    10. Posted by spencerO96 Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    SMQ/Mr. Hinton...why defensiveness? because we're OSU fans and because objectivity usually gets thrown out the window when it comes to our buckeyes. oklahoma, despite being frauds on an epic scale, yes, even when compared to OSU, gets bumped up in the AP when they don't even play a game, they get bumped up the previous week while OSU gets KNOCKED DOWN two spots after destroying a respectable toledo team.
    but did you really need to question why OSU fans are a little quick to jump the gun?
  11. Tim
    11. Posted by Tim Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Alabama against UF in the SEC Championship Game would be so fun. Very evenly matched teams with great running games and defense. I think the rest of the Gators very slightly makes up for their weaker passing game, and that could still change by the end of the season. Would be epic if they both arrived undefeated, but at that point I think the Gators would put too much pressure on themselves given all the players back for another season trying to finish without a loss for the first time in UF history. The nerves would probably get them in the end.
  12. Jason
    12. Posted by Jason Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Matt, thanks for the response. We'll have to wait and see which offense Tressel rolls out against Indiana. I'd like to see Pryor use his legs more because they are his most effective weapon.
    I still remember your blog on the USC-Texas NC Game where Vince Young led the Horns to victory by excellently executing the complicated "Run Like Hell" play from shotgun. I laughed so hard reading that entry that night. That's what I want to see from Terrelle. I'm not saying he can't be an effective passer, but his game isn't there yet. When pressured, his mechanics are some of the worst I've seen...from any quarterback. So I guess this is my plea to Coach Tress to let Terrelle call his own number for some highlight reels. "RLH Deuce".
    Keep up the great work on the blog, Doc.
  13. Tommy Boy
    13. Posted by Tommy Boy Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:19 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    To criticize OSU's not throwing aggressively in a "gorilla monsoon(lol!)"of a rain storm this past Saturday is the truest and most accurate description of a moron(and a hater)that I've ever heard of.In that weather,with Illinois' pitiful run defense and our O-line FINALLY showing they can run block,and our defense ending once and for all the myth of "Juice" Williams,why not run it down their throats?This is COLLEGE FOOTBALL,not the NFL,smart college coaches don't throw the ball over the place in that weather! F#%k the haters...GO BUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  14. U don't no me
    14. Posted by U don't no me Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:57 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bama, Will not be around at the end...!!! Mark my words...!!!!
  15. Doyle
    15. Posted by Doyle Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:22 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bama will assert their will on everybody
  16. desmondvt
    16. Posted by desmondvt Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:00 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The first half monsoon was definitely the reason you didn't see any passing. Once the rain passed, the game plan opened up. And in fact, Pryor was passing right up until the end, I think in part because 1) Tressel did indeed want to run up the score *just a little* on Zook, and 2) because he's working to give Pryor more reps.
    Here's what the stat line didn't show: Tressel unveiled an entirely reworked offensive attack against Illinois. We didn't see much of the usual pulling guard/ISO ridiculousness, with a 185-pound running back slamming into the back of his lead fullback, who himself had slammed into a nine man front. Instead the Buckeyes featured a zone blocking attack that absolutely gashed Illinois. Pryor operated all day out of the shotgun. We even ran the middle screen. And the O-line looked better on Saturday than it has in a long time, in large part because they were put in position to succeed.
    You want to make a Tressel dig, here's the one to make: Where the hell was this dynamic attack two weeks ago against USC? Because what we saw on Saturday most definitely was not business as usual for Tressel.
  17. Ramzy
    17. Posted by Ramzy Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:02 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    1) Torrential downpour in the Ohio State/Illinois game.
    2) Ohio State rushed for 10 yards on *eight* separate plays in the first half.
    3) "Please Tressel, just air it out instead stomping the Illini on the ground just so that your online critics won't hate!"
  18. Jack
    18. Posted by Jack Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:45 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I am an OSU grad, but also a realist who is not immune to occasional Tressel-bashing (I found Chris Brown's thorough fisking of Tressel after the USC game to be fair and accurate). Similarly, I have been significantly underwhelmed and disappointed by Terrell Pryor's progress to this point. However, this Saturday's game against Illinois was played in a torrential downpour. It was like a friggin' Cambodian jungle Saturday afternoon on that field.
    Is Tressel in general way too conservative? Yes. Do I feel that he routinely fails to put our guys in the best possible position to win games? Yes. Do I give him (and, by extension, Pryor) a bit of a pass for Saturday, considering the conditions? Yes.

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers