Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:22 pm EDT
Part of the Doc's ACC Week.
Whenever I think of N.C. State quarterback Russell Wilson, I always go back to his first steps on the college stage as a redshirt freshman, as the rather unlikely starter in the Wolfpack's season opener last year at South Carolina, which could not have gone more poorly:
N.C. State was so bad in that game, finishing 5-of-20 passing with four turnovers, 138 yards total offense and zero points, that it seemed entirely plausible the Wolfpack wouldn't find the end zone all season. After the 27-9 loss at Clemson in its ACC opener, in which the only State touchdown was an interception return by the defense on the first play of the game, it even seemed likely the Wolfpack wouldn't find the end zone all season.
And frankly, if not for Russell Wilson, that prediction probably wouldn't have been very far off the mark:

Outside of their triumphant performance in the William & Mary game (with still included two interceptions), Daniel Evans and Harrison Beck collaborated for three scoring drives all season, despite taking a solid majority of the snaps against South Carolina, South Florida and in the bowl game against Rutgers, and part of the game against Clemson -- in which Beck replaced Wilson for one play in the first half and was intercepted for a Tiger touchdown. The Pack was four times less likely to score a touchdown with Beck or Evans as opposed to Wilson, and about eight times more likely to turn the ball over. If all 28 touchdown drives with Wilson on the field had ended in punts instead, he still would have been significantly more efficient than his colleagues with his eerie aversion to interceptions (1 in 275 attempts) alone.
The effects on the win-loss column, of course, were about as stark. Again discounting the William & Mary game, N.C. State started 1-3 with Wilson moving in and out of the lineup -- where the lone win, a 30-24 upset over East Carolina, was the only game Wilson played start to finish in September, and the worst loss by far, a 41-10 disaster against South Florida, was the only game he didn't play in at all -- only to finish 4-3 with Wilson starting the rest of the regular season, including a four-game winning streak in November to sneak into a bowl game.

There's no better petri dish for Wilson's effect on the offense than the bowl: At halftime, Wilson had led scoring drives of 81, 65 and 80 yards and the Wolfpack led Rutgers 17-6. After Wilson was knocked out of the game at the start of the second half, Evans and Beck combined for three interceptions and the Knights stormed back for a 29-23 win.
The fact is that by the end of the regular season, N.C. State had begun to roll on offense, and with blowouts over North Carolina and Miami and the big first half against Rutgers, was probably playing as well overall as any team in the ACC. And the ACC remains as wide open -- especially in the Atlantic Division -- as it was throughout last year, when the Pack finished just one game back in the division despite the late start. Wilson gets back three of his top four receivers, including downfield threat Owen Spencer, who led the ACC and was No. 3 nationally in yards per catch, along with four seniors on the offensive line.
It's understandable given the Pack's recent history and overall talent level why no one is willing to pull the trigger on a division title or take a flier on them in the top-25; that's just playing the odds. But as long as Wilson is healthy and functioning the defense doesn't fall flat on its face (and what offense in this league could exploit it if it did?), darkhorses don't come much better than this. But even with hyped redshirt freshman Mike Glennon expected to provide some respectability on the depth chart, the key in that equation is clearly keeping Wilson upright.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
19 Comments
1 - 19 of 19
Report Abuse
Georgia Tech. The jackets especially exploited teams that fell flat on their face, see the FSU DT strategy.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
If that is truly your answer, then you are predicting a HUGE year for the Wolfpack. Since NC State is not scheduled to play Ga Tech this year, the only way the Ga Tech offense could exploit the Wolfpack defense would be in the ACC Championship game.
I suspect, however, such a prediction was not your intention. Know the facts before posting, you'll come off less ignorant.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Not true... he is an athlete, solid in play and stature. He starts for the Wolfpack baseball team too. His injuries tended to be more of a function of his playmaking ability... not knowing when to go down before the hit.
Report Abuse
However, the question was "what offense in this league could exploit" not "what offense on their schedule could exploit". No ignorance involved, I was literally answering the question.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And the coach's are doing a fine job with the offense. The only reason Wilson was hurt during games was because of him not sliding when carrying the ball. Many people forget that Tom O'Brien was the reason why Matt Ryan was so successful. He knows what he's doing. I predict this team to finish 9-3 with Wilson as a starter and Glennon contributing when needed.
Report Abuse
Apologies on the tone my earlier posting took.. I just reread it, and the tone was not intended. It was late. I meant "ignorant" in its literal sense, ie, you didn't know they did not play. Not meant to demean.
But anyway, about that "could exploit" phrase... Nope, if they don't play, no way an exploitation occurs, impossible! :) Should be "Could exploit if..." But I'm just playing... I get your point, and agree.
PJ's offense with the quality of athlete at Ga Tech - especially with the linemen getting another year in the system (more important for them than for the backs, IMO) - COULD exploit any defense in the country - as long as they execute and perform.
It takes a very talented and disciplined defense, executing a sound game plan to slow down Ga Tech's offense. But more likely, when the offense sputters, it will be from lack of execution by the offense and/or turnovers. No team can be at their best every week for a 12 game season.
Report Abuse
Not so... Actually, that is OBrien's (TOB) biggest criticism of Wilson, that he sometimes tries to do too much on his own, that he does not go down earlier, and thus, avoid more hits than he's been taking.
Echoing Anthony's post, TOB prefers the type of offense he ran at BC, stand up, pocket passer ala Matt Ryan. Being a good coach, he tweaked the offense to minimize the effect of our O-line's weaknesses and maximize the strengths of Wilson.
Some what of a side note, though related... some criticize Wilson's accuracy due to his 55% completion rate. But this was due to the same qualities that led to his 17 TD's / 1 int ratio. ONE interception as a FRESHMAN QB! Think about that....
Those who followed the 'Pack know this was due to Wilson's discipline beyond his freshman years... he rarely forced passes. If no one was open and the play was dead, he simply through the ball out of bounds.
Report Abuse
Me too. It was dramatic last year, as there was little experience in the backup LB's - his replacement, Maddox, was a true freshman.
But this year, it won't be nearly as much. The LB's position is now much deeper, and much more experienced, we also get Manning back off IR. Other players, at all positions, 'grew up' under fire last year with Irving being out so much. The vital leadership provided by Irving last year will now be spread amongst some of those players. His loss shouldn't (hopefully) be felt as dramatically as it was last year.
Don't get me wrong, Irving is a HUGE loss for the 'Pack. Irving was important not only due to his leadership and talent, but because he has "IT". He is a playmaker, a difference maker. Everyone knew if a big play was needed, Nate could do it. That aspect of his game can not be replaced.
With Irving, I would agree with those picking the 'Pack to win the Atlantic. Without him, the 'Pack is a potential contender. The offense (O-line in particular) will have to be that much better and the DB's as a unit will need to play beyond their years, experience, and expectations.
Report Abuse
No.
Beck played six plays in the first half and was not intercepted for a touchdown. He was not intercepted. The Pack got one first down and then punted.
Report Abuse
I was thinking the same thing. He was a huge difference-maker.
1 - 19 of 19