Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

Conquered favorites and other notables picking up the pieces of shattered ambition this week:

We, uh, may have made a huge mistake. West Virginia only beat East Carolina by 41 points in '07, so it's not altogether surprising following a 62-point swing in just one year that the Charleston Gazette's Dave Hickman has to remind 'Eer fans that, yes, the sun will come up tomorrow (although even a level-headed, bespectacled columnist might have his doubts when he files that column at midnight, when the smoke from the Appalachian couch fires is blotting out the heavens). Not surprisingly, Michigan obsessive, noted RichRod enthusiast and prominent WVU antagonist Brian Cook was quick to jump in the driver's seat schadenfreude bandwagon, and, well, Mountaineer message boarders suddenly have a hard time disagreeing with him about boss Bill Stewart:

I was willing to give him at least three before he collapsed it. Never did I think we would look this bad, flat, soft, and lethargic within the first month of his first year.
[...]
The players gave up before I did today, and the coaches gave up before they did.

You are upset because you know I'm right. This hire was a huge mistake. Stewart had ONE off-season without RR, Magee, and Barwis and two games into the season the players are playing soft and without emotion.
[...]
This is yet another thing that Mike Garrison screwed up. He was probably wasted in a luxury box at the Fiesta Bowl and decided what the hell, let's hire Stew.
[...]
I've kept my mouth shut for the last year. The WVU President was a fraud who is to blame for all this. Stewart is a good ol' boy just like [ex-WVU coach Frank] Cignetti. The players love him. We are in trouble. I saw this happen back in 1977.

And so on, three days and counting. Those are more entertaining when read out loud, by the way. West By God Virginia has the appropriately succinct summation (careful with that one, sensitive clickers).

Also on the Mountaineer message boards: Sour grapes, Slander, Psychosis.+MORE+

Careful what you wish for. Maryland partisans and watchers were baffled by Ralph Friedgen's decision to start Jordan Steffy at quarterback over incumbent Chris Turner, who eventually beat Steffy out for the job in '07, and when Steffy was injured in the Terps' lackluster opening win over Delaware, they got their wish: Turner played the entire game Saturday against Sun Belt who dat Middle Tennessee State, and it was, like, the worst loss ever. Turner get picked three times and the UMD defense give up 400 yards in a 24-14 embarrassment, and he Baltimore Sun's Jeff Barker was left wondering how to fix a quarterback controversy gone very wrong:

I've often thought quarterback controversies can be sort of fun, at least for the fans.

Fans get to ponder a variety of quarterback possibilities and scenarios. If they don't like the incumbent, they can always imagine that their team's fortunes would improve if only the coach would bring in the other guy to call signals.

â¨But what if the other guy is summoned and isn't the immediate answer?

That takes some of the excitement out of it. Suddenly, all the optimistic speculation is replaced by . . . reality.

The immediate reality for the Terps is that the once-beloved Friedgen is probably coaching for his job over the rest of the year, or, as summed up by Testudo Times,

This is sad.

On the Terrapin message boards: Indignation, Ultimatums, Denial

Sympathy won't pay Tyrone Willingham's country club membership. Where to begin with Washington, a team heaped with well-wishes since Saturday afternoon for a bad call at the end of a game the Huskies really shouldn't have been in, anyway? When it so clearly comes down to refs there's not much wiggle room in the opinion column, and the Seattle Times' Steve Kelley uses his to blast away for the home team:

"It really should be a no-call," Washington's remarkably composed coach Tyrone Willingham said. "But it's one that they have to call when they see it."

No, they don't.

Officials should consider the circumstances. They should consider the act and the intent of the act. And, let's be honest, they should consider the player.
[...]
Locker apologized to his teammates after the game. But there really was no need for an apology.

There was nothing excessive in Locker's celebration. Nothing unsportsmanlike.

Referee Larry Farina said officials had to throw a flag, adding: "It was not a judgment call."

Every call is a judgment call. Every holding penalty that isn't flagged is a judgment call.

The new Husky blog UW Dawg Pound says "Oh yeah?" What about the real problems? Like, I dunno . . .

The Times' Bob Condotta rounds up the reaction to the unsportsmanlike call, twice, in fact, and Post-Intelligencer "Fan Blogger" Nathan Ware finds a way to be disappointed in Tyrone Willingham, anyway.

On the Husky message boards: Sympathy (lots and lots of sympathy), Vengeance, Hate.

- - -
â¨Elsewhere in Disillusion: Randy Shannon is fine with that last field goal Florida kicked in the fourth quarter. Urban Meyer will be made to suffer a slow, unmerciful fate when Shannon's nascent tropical depressions are fully-fledged Canes, but it's cool. . . . Building the Dam thinks the Pi Phis posing as the Oregon State defense were alright at Penn State, all things considered. . . . And what are the odds of a post-game thread remaining civil in the immediate aftermath of a nine-touchdown loss? Surprisingly good, actually.

- - -
Photo of Bill Stewart via the Associated Press; Photo of Chris Turner being sacked via US Presswire.

digg delicious
more

11 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. gtne91
    1. Posted by gtne91 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I hate the consider the circumstances argument. If its a penalty in the middle of the 2nd quarter, it should be a penalty with 2 seconds to go. Has anyone not had that exact penalty called on their team and thought "thats a stupid rule but our guy just has to know better and not do that"?
    Hey Locker, try handing the ball to the ref next time. You are rarely penalized for that.
  2. adder30
    2. Posted by adder30 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Excitement and celebration make the game fun. I've seen dozens of chest bumps and high fives after touchdowns in the last 2 weeks and fail to see how tossing a ball over the shoulder is any more egregious than those celebrations. Ref's fault or rule-makers' fault? I don't know, but I know I don't like it.
  3. J. Sims
    3. Posted by J. Sims Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Calling a penalty on Locker for what he did is 100% against the spirit of the rule. Yes, context matters - I think Locker is probably a little more excited to scramble for a TD with two seconds left on a great play than to score a ho-hum TD in the second.
    Does anyone actually think he threw the ball in the air as a matter of trying to one-up anybody or rub it in to the other team? Do you honestly think anyone on the BYU sidelines was upset about him throwing the ball in the air? Please.
  4. CardsFan922
    4. Posted by CardsFan922 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    WVU -- they are going through exactly what we did last year. Look for the admin/AD to blame RichRod, lots of quotes from players about how they are going to practice harder and how they will get through this together as a team, stuff about "wait until Stewart gets his players in here", etc etc. If WVU loses to Marshall, mostly watch your backs. Looting, rioting, dogs/cats living together.....it will be awful.
    Anyway, Doc SMQ, I read today that UofL and USM have signed a 2-year home and home to begin next year. Finally, a chance for retribution for the "fake punt" touchdown from a few years back.
  5. dethwing
    5. Posted by dethwing Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    J Sims:
    First, Locker's intent is immaterial. I agree he was not trying to show up anyone, but the Refs have been instructed to look for this kind of thing, and crack down on it. Think about it this way: If it HADN'T been called, he'd still be influencing the game by looking the other way on a clear rule violation. Perhaps it's a bad rule, but it's still a rule. The Ref has his job to consider and pretty much has to do what he's told to do.
    Second, and I know you didn't actually put it this way, but a lot of other people are trying to play if off a small toss:
    He threw the ball a considerable ammount. There are two views I've seen of the play. One is a far away shot of the play developing. Once he stands the ball actually LEAVES THE SHOT. It's high enough that a far away shot still manages to miss it.
    The other shot is from the endline after he jumps up. He throws the ball, turns to one teammate to jump with, jumps with A SECOND teamamte, and THEN the ball finally comes back down. You can see it come back down and hit him as he's celebrating with a second teammate. It looked to me like the ball stayed in the air a good 4 seconds. I would definately call that "HIGH" in the air.
  6. J. Sims
    6. Posted by J. Sims Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Of course he threw the ball high up in the air - he was pumped up. It was obviously a natural display of emotion. If it's in the rulebook as saying that a penalty MUST be called in that situation, then its a bad rule. If it's in the rulebook that a penalty CAN be called in that situation, which is what the qute that I saw said, that I can't seem to relocate now, then its a bad decision by the official.
    Either way a celebration penalty is officially for "unsportsmanlike conduct." What constituates a behavior as "unsportsmanlike" is necessarily a judgment call. To me, and it seems, most people, there was nothing "unsportsmanlike" about Locker's actions following his run on Saturday.
  7. killjoy
    7. Posted by killjoy Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Right on, dethwing. The call on Locker was a good one, period. All this nonsense about intent is absurd. Still could have and should have made the point. If I had any doubt, listening to the world's biggest arseswabber, Brent Musberger, gibbering on about the call, convinced me it is essential to the fate of the human race.
  8. nick s
    8. Posted by nick s Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    what ever happened the extra point was blocked blocked not missed quit crying washington and get more practice yes it was a bad call
  9. J. Sims
    9. Posted by J. Sims Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm absolutely not saying that Washington should have won the game - they lost because they got a 34-yd extra point blocked - which shouldn't happen.
    That said, can those of you claiming it was a good call honestly tell me that you think Locker's action was "unsportsmanlike?"
  10. killjoy
    10. Posted by killjoy Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    J. Sims,
    I agree with the rule and the call. The precise action by Locker is defined as requiring a penalty under the rule, making it per se unsportsmanlike. Officials who don't make this kind of call should be disciplined.
  11. J. Sims
    11. Posted by J. Sims Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Fair enough. Agree to disgaree then, I guess. I simply don't see anything unsportsmanlike with Locker's action.

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers