Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:34 pm EDT
Or, college football does its best impression of the Soup Nazi.
There were far more controversial calls over the weekend, and even in Notre Dame's win over Washington, but the final play in South Bend is an interesting Rorschach test on one of the major themes of the early season. Specifically, did it cross your mind that the hit on the Huskies' D'Andre Goodwin might draw a flag?
Looks clean to me, but I know some Washington fans (predictably) thought a "helmet-to-helmet" flag should have been thrown on the Irish, and some not-so-biased observers agreed with them in the immediate aftermath. And then again, being the sort that doesn't recognize the possibility of any penalty except a facemask during the act of bring down a runner, earlier in the year I didn't think Reshad Jones' hit on Justin Blackmon at Oklahoma State was a penalty, either:
But it drew a flag, anyway. So, too, did Michigan State's Roderick Jenrette, flying to the ball Saturday to help bring down Michigan's Junior Hemingway:
It's not surprising that that call came in a Big Ten game, since -- per its preseason dictum -- the Big Ten has been ground zero for the unsportsmanlike hit. The conference felt duty-bound to suspend Michigan's Jonas Mouton for a game for delivering an uppercut to a Notre Dame lineman at the end of a play, even though (or maybe because) it didn't draw a flag in the game:
... which didn't sit well at all with Mouton's coach, Rich Rodriguez, who accepted the suspension but subsequently informed the Big Ten that "we will watch every Big Ten game very closely and every non-football act, a six-inch jab or anything that is not called for in the game of football, we’re going to ask that that person gets the same type of punishment that Jonas Mouton got." And so the conference has been doling out questionable suspensions at every possible opportunity in the meantime, namely on Purdue's Zach Reckman and Ohio State's Kurt Coleman:
Coaches Danny Hope and Jim Tressel, like Rodriguez, were understandably incensed that fairly routine misdemeanors -- worth a flag, probably, but a suspension? -- were being handled as felonies.
All of those calls are pretext to what really, really bothered me about the dual personal foul penalties on Georgia on LSU for excessive celebration after go-ahead touchdowns in the final two minutes, which have been so universally deplored in the subsequent 48 hours. It's not just that they were bad calls (they obviously were), or that they dramatically changed the outcome of the game (they didn't; Georgia may have had an argument on the latter point if it hadn't gotten the exact same bogus call on LSU seconds later). But they personified the over-the-top, ticky-tack trend that from my perspective has nearly ruined the NFL -- where officials seemingly have no discretion whatsoever to let slide a borderline crime that couldn't possibly warrant the subsequent punishment, sometimes radically altering the game in the process -- and that's slowly, steadily trickling down into the college game under the banner of "player safety." That's not really a banner you can argue with. But it is an inherently violent game, fundamentally requiring violent acts between the whistles, and especially in the process of making tackles. It's an inherently emotional game, especially when it dramatically turns in your team's favor in front of 80,000 people with less than two minutes to play. At some point, the emphasis on enforcing "sportsmanship" and "safety" can cross the line to penalizing and ultimately preventing a player from a) doing his job, and (just as importantly) b) enjoying his job when performed well, which was supposed to be the point, somewhere in there.
This is not a big complaint, but it is a complaint. Let the kids play football.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
46 Comments
25 - 44 of 46
Report Abuse
The non flag was the right call, IMHO
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And then Georgia had time left to do the same thing but Cox threw the pick.
That being said, I really don't like the new rule for throwing the flag on those plays.
But, how about this? They know the rule, so just score the TD and hand the ball to the official, and leave the field.
How hard is that to do?
Report Abuse
But did you notice that the people who wanted soup were playing by his rules?
The players on the field should do the same thing.
Adapt to the rules.
Report Abuse
However, both penalty's should not have been called. Neither case was excessive by today's standards.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
It's a shame what they've done to the game.
Report Abuse
1. are you related, in any way, to dr. hunter thompson?
2. the experts on our staff, using the ncaa rulebook, 1st class knowledge of the nca rules on college football officiating, game films from many angles and direction, and lots of experience in doing nfl style real time review rated the pac 10 ref crew and and the big east tech review at 100% honest. these evaluations do not take into account, in any way, which team won the game.
3. we have gotten back many called and uncalled penalties in many hundreds of games over the past 3 years, but 100% grades are very rare.
4. every week, we award a most dishonest game and tech review prize.
5.the big 10 ref and tech review crews at the michigan/ notre dame and again in the michigan state/ notre dame game and yet again at at the michigan/ indiana game won that prize.
6. this past saturday, 1st prize for the most dishonest ref crew went to the all sec crew at the georgia. lsu game, at which dishonest ref calls actually changing to outcome of that game. 1st, this sec crew called a phony celebration penalty which forced georgis to kick off from near the goal line and when lsu needed more time to score, this ref crew just put extra time back on the game clock until lsu scored with less that 56 seconds left on the game clock when georgia kicked off(no, lsu did not run back the lsu kickoff for td. lsu needed more time than 56 seconds to score and this sec just kept adding more time to the game clock.
7. we found out the names of those sec refs from the complete box scores available at the website of virtually every school and the names of the sec commissioner and rogers redding, the sec conference official in charge of football officiating.
6. we found out the home addresses of everyone involved along with a list of their material possesions by paying for that information at intelius.com.
7. obviously, we sent our game films which record every game from positions all over the fields and at different angles and 3 seasons ago to the sec commissioner and to rogers redding.
8.the bone thrown our way was a 10/5/2009 press release from the sec stating that there was actually no basis for the celebration penalty against geogia.
9. is that enough for us? hell, no. we will whack them all with civil rico lawsuits unless they agree to settlements before lawsuits are filed. all settlements will require the payment of significant damages, resignations at the end of the 2009 season, and no more crooked oficiating during the 2009 season.
10. we are also not impresed, in any way, by the big 10 conference's alleged new no toleration rules since the big 10's delany and carollo and parry have been bringing in very large payoffs for many years for running the crooked officiating scams, along with counterparts from every single conference in the us. larry scott, the new pac 10 commissioner is proving to be an honest man. even though he got stuck with jim mulddoon and dave cutaia. who have been running the crooked officiating department at the pac 10 for many years.
11. you have raised a key issue here.
12. we congratulate you and suggest that you start mentioning the names of the crooked refs and tech reviewers, along with the names of those at the conference and ncaa levels who protect the crooked offiials.
13. if you need actual game films instead of trying to work from pretty terrible tv feeds. just ask and we will supply them to you.
14. it would also help if you read then ncaa rulebook for football officiating very carefuly so that you can point out out the specific ncaa rules, along with each film clip.
15. you could name your new extra site dr. teusday since the game films analyses are not normally completed until very late monday night.
you have a real winner in your dishonest officiating section if you do it correctly.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Of all the examples given in this article, it seems to me that the one most deserving of the attention is the Michigan upper cut. It was after a play, it was a blatant cheap shot, and as such, I can't see much difference between it and the sucker punch by the Oregon running back earlier in the year. Both actions received what was just: suspension. There is no place for that kind of nonsense. Deal with it promptly and you will set the tone for others. Rodriguez's temper tantrum and Michigan's subsequent threats against the Big Ten underscores how little class that school has, regardless of the hype it constantly, ad nauseaum, is trying to remind us of: "we have the Big House!" (with no room to actually sit comfortably in order to squeeze in those people); "we have the winningest record in all of college football!" (you wouldn't if you didn't count all those early wins against high school teams); "we're so much better than any other football team in the country!" (how's that Ohio State rivalry going?); etc etc etc. Perhaps I'm a bit sensitive as I live in Michigan these days, and have to deal with all the "Wal-Mart Wolverines" that plague this area. It makes me homesick for Florida fans, and that's REALLY saying something (no offense G8RJEF!).
At the risk of sounding repetitious, the officiating around the nation just seems worse this season than in the past. I'm one of those rare fans that doesn't believe that every call made against your team is bogus, that many of them are justified and appropriate. However, even in the games where I don't have a dog in the fight (for example, the recent Michigan/Michigan State game), I was simply shaking my head in disbelief and yelling at the TV in disgust. The conferences need to step up their training of the referees and look for folks who are able to actually keep up with the speed of the game.
Finally, I'll toss this out for thoughts and discussion: instant reply in college football seems to be working in a fantastic way. Might it be time to consider what MLB has done with its instant replay, and allow some of the truly subjective penalties (such as excessive celebration) be reviewed by a second party? It might prevent something like the Georgia/LSU debacle of this past weekend.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
There is no reason that you cannot hit a player hard and not go to the frikking head. I am an OSU fan, i I even think Colemans shot was a cheap shot.
Lastly - Rich Rod shows the amazing class he brings to michigan by saying a player that takes a jab at another players chin as a cheap shot shouldnt be suspended. Way to get such a class act at Michigan! A coach who thinks it is okay to take cheap shots and punch people on the football field!
Report Abuse
There is no reason that you cannot hit a player hard and not go to the frikking head. I am an OSU fan, i I even think Colemans shot was a cheap shot.
Lastly - Rich Rod shows the amazing class he brings to michigan by saying a player that takes a jab at another players chin as a cheap shot shouldnt be suspended. Way to get such a class act at Michigan! A coach who thinks it is okay to take cheap shots and punch people on the football field!
Report Abuse
One of the reasons I signed on to play football and did so for 15 years is because it separated the kids in town. You had to be a tough guy to play football. You knew the risks involved and played anyway. It sounds barbaric, but if you dont want to risk serious injury, try baseball..
Report Abuse
I was college football from the early 90's back. Backflaps stickin out, cut jerseys showing stomach, reflective visors, following through on your tackles even if its near the sideline, helmet stickers, I'll even take mushroom cuts and high tops back. Just let us play the damn game.
Report Abuse
Protecting the players is a good thing, but most of the above calls are ridiculus. It wouldn't surpise me if future players will be afraid to tackle because of the potential for a penalty. If you don't want your guy getting creamed, then stop thowing the ball high across the middle!
Report Abuse
The NFL is for DOUCHEBAGS...in fact, all pro sports are for DOUCHEBAGS
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
25 - 44 of 46