Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

Join the Doc's game day live blog, covering every game, all day long.

Washington 16, USC 13. We'll return to Washington's role in this Tunguska event momentarily, but for the record: Congratulations, Huskies. Last week you end the nation's longest losing streak; this week you end a 10-game Pac-10 skid by knocking off the seven-time-reigning conference champion. That's, uh, quite a turnaround you've got there, Coach Sarkisian.

Now, to the main event: Welcome back to the center of the shame stage, USC. The Trojans ought to be familiar enough with the routine by now; I know I am, considering we went through the same reaction twice in 2006, again in 2007 and again last year. It's the Trojans' fifth loss as a double-digit favorite in four years, all of them utter jaw-droppers. The home collapse against Stanford two years ago -- when the Cardinal were also breaking in a brand new, young coach after a catastrophe of a season in 2006 -- was the greatest upset of all time; the Huskies were only half the underdog today (+19) that Stanford was then (+38), but that speaks far more to where the Trojans are now than the Huskies. And where that is, clearly, is in a near-constant state of vulnerability for a team that probably still deserves to be favored every time it walks on the field.

I'll say here exactly what I said after last year's stunning loss at Oregon State: USC can't keep getting passes for games like this. Three Four years in a row it's dropped out of the top two or three in the polls with a shocking, inexcusable loss to a vastly inferior outfit, with the exact same set of problems: Inconsistency at quarterback, a sketchy, makeshift running game and no go-to playmakers anywhere on an offense ostensibly overflowing with them.

Unlike last year, however, I'm no longer willing to concede that one-loss SC is certain to rebound and wind up running roughshod over the rest of the Pac-10, anyway. This bunch had a laundry list of obvious issues coming in, especially at quarterback, and it's not going to solve them by getting Matt Barkley back next week from his sore shoulder. These are not fluky problems: The Trojans are not good right now on offense; they're disconcertingly young on defense; and they're banged up everywhere.

Most distressingly, the killer instinct that's been so apparent for years in big games was completely absent again today when the spotlight was off: The Trojans moved the ball just fine, especially on the ground, but failed to score at all on four separate drives that crossed the Husky 35-yard line and had to settle for field goals on two others. For the second week in a row, the offense mounted one (1) sustained touchdown drive. Only this one was against the reigning laughingstock of the West Coast, not a perennial top-10 power, and Washington was able to take command with momentum in its grasp in a way Ohio State almost refused to.

So the Huskies, clearly, are a very, very different team under former SC offensive coordinator Steve Sarkisian than under Tyrone Willingham, whose lackluster recruiting supposedly left the program in a hole it would take a half-decade to crawl out of. Judging from the Huskies' heroic effort against LSU in the opener and the new Upset of the Year, it took Sarkisian an offseason. Talent or not, this is a totally different team.

USC, though, USC is the Same Old Trojans: Win the big one, gaffe away the little one. Four straight years and counting. Again, I'll repeat myself from last September's loss in Corvallis: If Ohio State deserves to be ridiculed and scorned and run out the mythical championship picture on a rail for its primetime, big game failures, when are we going to hold USC accountable for repeatedly losing the little one?

digg delicious
more

118 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Ummmm
    1. Posted by Ummmm Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    While USC is clearly not as strong as usual this year, I think the fact that Washington had USCs former coordinators is huge and should not be overlooked.
  2. Alaska Hokie
    2. Posted by Alaska Hokie Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:39 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    When are we going to hold USC accountable for repeatedly losing the little one?
    2006. They didn't go to the national championship game that year, and they won't reach it this year, either.
    But I agree about the big game failures not being proportional to the small-game ones. Virginia Tech was castigated for losing to what looks like the SEC, and Ohio State was similarly derided for losing to USC. USC probably won't drop out of the top 10.
  3. Zachary K
    3. Posted by Zachary K Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:45 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "World's most easily-toppled goliath"=best description of anything, anywhere.
  4. Demon
    4. Posted by Demon Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    In week one, LSU played Washington. At the end of that game, we were told that we "escaped" Washington with a win, and they were correct. On the blog afterward, a guy brazenly said, Washington would beat USC, and I just knew he must have been on drugs. Apparently I was wrong. the truth is, LSU did barely "escape" Washington. This team is a little better than advertised, and it shows. Trojans shouldn't take it too hard that they got upset, but the should be pretty p!ssed that USC was not more prepared for this game, especially since it was a former member of the Trojan coaching staff that handed them the loss. It is very possible that USC could drop to 10 and a worse case scenario - 11. They are still in striking distance. But hay, The nations longest win streak got snapped - Utah lost as well.
  5. tw61432000
    5. Posted by tw61432000 Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Alright all you USC fans, let's hear the excuses!!!!!
  6. carrie
    6. Posted by carrie Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    USC should drop completely out of the Top 25, because they suck.
  7. A.G.
    7. Posted by A.G. Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Shows how much a coaching change can effect a team. Dawgs are back baby! WOOF WOOF!
  8. Zach
    8. Posted by Zach Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    USC going into a PAC-10 road game against two former USC coordinators who have a dynamic QB in Jake Locker and dropping a close game isn't too surprising. A lack of Taylor Mays on defense and poor QB play on offense is an excuse, but USC did give the game away with turnovers. I still feel like that by the end of the year, USC will be one of the best teams in the nation that doesn't have a chance of playing for the title, but we've got to stop losing the little games.
  9. Broadway Jeff
    9. Posted by Broadway Jeff Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This game came as no surprise to me I called it 3 days ago when I told my buddy it would be a close game but Huskies by a field goal. It was time for Pete carrol to lose and thank god it was the Huskies....WOOF!
  10. Uncle Rico
    10. Posted by Uncle Rico Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:04 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Post #5
    NO excuses unlike when your sorry ass team loses.
    The offense is impotent. The defense held all SJSU, OSU, and UW to all within 15 or less points. The offense is horrible even when Barkley comes back. The same old plays every year. I can't count how many bootlegs, waggles, and three step drops we have run the past 5 years. Lame. We are becoming the OSU of the Pac-10, predictable.
  11. Dan S
    11. Posted by Dan S Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It is so great to be rid of that sorry excuse for a coach Willingham. Maybe we can now get back to the Don James type of dominant football teams of the 70's and 80's!
  12. Tomie A
    12. Posted by Tomie A Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    aaron corp jus sucks..! he the worst qb they had in like 10 years..!
  13. jonathan s
    13. Posted by jonathan s Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Playing a former coordinator works both ways, yes he knows what USC likes to do but the USC defensive coaches can remember what he liked to do. This is really two weeks in a row that USC has not looked good.
  14. ess-eee-seee
    14. Posted by ess-eee-seee Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:15 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Further proof that the Mountain West is the premier conference in the West.... country... No- the multiverse!
    We could beat everybody in the country if they would play us! Pay no attention to the mountain of evidence to the contrary.
    Instead, focus on the outliers! Outliers!!!!!
  15. cunny
    15. Posted by cunny Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    muy frio, queso. leer. comer.
  16. James Aragon
    16. Posted by James Aragon Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:22 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I wonder if Washington beating further opponents this season should continue to be a surprise now?
  17. jaydawgghs
    17. Posted by jaydawgghs Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    1. Aaron Corp had NOTHING to bring to the table. Not a single good run, not a single good throw.
    2. It's ludicrous of you to dismiss USC's running game; they averaged close to 8 yards per run.
    Credit Washington's defense with getting timely stops and turnovers.
  18. cunny
    18. Posted by cunny Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Mich Mustain must have 37 broken bones or something. That's the only reason I can think of as to why he didn't get in the game. Could he have possibly been WORSE than Corp?
    With that said: good job, Huskies. You played hard from whistle to whistle and got a nice win.
    Mich Mustain must have 37 broken bones or something. That's the only reason I can think of as to why he didn't get in the game. Could he have possibly been WORSE than Corp?
    With that said: good job, Huskies. You played hard from whistle to whistle and got a nice win.
    Mich Mustain must have 37 broken bones or something. That's the only reason I can think of as to why he didn't get in the game. Could he have possibly been WORSE than Corp?
    With that said: good job, Huskies. You played hard from whistle to whistle and got a nice win.
  19. SoCal Dawg
    19. Posted by SoCal Dawg Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Aaron Corp DOES suck, but I don't think it would have been any different with Barkley. The Huskies flat out dominated the condoms today. Yes...for a team that was a 19 point underdog, they dominated. End of story.
  20. cunny
    20. Posted by cunny Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Muy frio
  21. cunny
    21. Posted by cunny Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    (breathing)
  22. bucks#1fan
    22. Posted by bucks#1fan Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    They suck, are overated, and it happens to them every year, need I say more.
  23. SoCal Dawg
    23. Posted by SoCal Dawg Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The defense still needs to improve, but nice win Dawgs!
  24. SoCal Dawg
    24. Posted by SoCal Dawg Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:44 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The defense still needs to improve, but nice win Dawgs!
  25. June Bug
    25. Posted by June Bug Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:44 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Pete simply did not have any control of this game and it showed by him saying he didn't know who was going to QB all week....this showed his team lack of confidence.
    ps...CARRIE, your comment just shows your lack of everything. Do us a favor and go post on OMG

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers