Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

Befitting their status as the most knowledgeable fans in the country, Nebraskans are busy today assembling their early scouting reports on Texas Tech to pass out to the schoolchildren ahead of Friday's pregame test, and naturally want to know who's going to line up as the Raiders' starting quarterback in Lincoln: Usual starter Taylor Potts, who missed last week's game against Kansas State with a concussion, or career scout-teamer Steven Sheffield, who lit up the Wildcats with an ungodly stat line (33-of-41, 490 yards, seven touchdowns) even by Texas Tech standards in the first significant action of his career? The Nebraska State Paper put the question today to evil pirate genius Mike Leach, who may or may not get around to thinking about the question himself this week, and certainly won't be telling anyone if his mind does happen to wander in that direction:

The Red Raiders' coach won’t be naming his starting quarterback for the 2:30 p.m. game during the week. Instead, Leach sardonically said, expect the "excitement and drama" of a "gametime decision" between junior Taylor Potts and sophomore Steven "Sticks" Sheffield ...

I'm not sure how 6'4", 190-pound Sheffield managed to become the first in a long line of lanky Raider passers to earn the nickname "Sticks" for himself, but I am certain after his prolific debut against the Wildcats and a solid decade of uninterrupted assaults on record books from Leach-bred quarterbacks that the specific identity of the man in the gun Saturday is purely academic -- Potts and Sheffield have topped 400 yards in five of the Raiders' first six games, including 420 yards and three touchdowns by Potts in the loss at Texas, and are on pace for more touchdowns and a higher pass efficiency rating than any other season in Leach's tenure. They're both ordinary passers with average talent who are guaranteed to shred every secondary they face to some impressive extent, as Husker fans well know -- Nebraska has lost three straight t three different Leach-led quarterbacks, including the 70-10 rout Tech put on Bill Callahan's first team in 2004.

This Nebraska D is a little better than that, currently residing at No. 2 nationally in scoring defense and No. 3 in pass efficiency defense after last Thursday's monsoon game with Missouri. That may be good enough to keep Tech below 400 yards/35 points, but not based on which remote-controlled robo-slinger is standing in the shotgun on any given play.

- - -
Hat tip: CFT.

digg delicious
more

32 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Phil M
    1. Posted by Phil M Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:18 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "average arms" Umm, Potts has a much better arm than McCoy... He has a damn good "fast ball" in a football sense and can heave it.
    Probably their best "thrower" in his tenure.
  2. GabeG
    2. Posted by GabeG Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Since you want to bring up the past LongTrans.. Didn't you think it was funny how Texas tech completely humiliated nebraska 70-10 in 2004? Now THAT was funny.
  3. Tim
    3. Posted by Tim Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:19 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Great title to this post, Matt.
  4. LongTrans
    4. Posted by LongTrans Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:39 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wow GabeG, 2004? Now THAT is the past. Nebraska will beat you, no doubt. I hear Leach enjoys "pretending" other things too, like Tech even matters this season. It just cracks me up how everyone always wants to bring up the Tech QB "stats." Stats don't matter much when you lose games, do they? But hang on to your stats, sadly it's really all you have.
  5. GabeG
    5. Posted by GabeG Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:49 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Haha good luck with UT because God knows you guys need it.
  6. ess-eee-seee
    6. Posted by ess-eee-seee Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    No kitten in this Big 12 fight, but Texas Tech matters. This year, Nebraska does too, but it didn't between Osborne and Pellini. Good luck to Oklahoma in the quest for a good win before the season ends.
  7. PHUC NUTT/as in houston
    7. Posted by PHUC NUTT/as in houston Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i would think most of the country is pretending to care about texas tech (except for Ole MIss especially Ole Miss they would love to play another over - RATED TECH TEAM) since when is anything tech does relevant outside of lubbock (uhm- hum cough cough Oxford ) oh that's right NEVER. leach get's offer's every off - season, but relluctantly stay's in lubbock ? & why nott it's like the equivalent of being the center of attention @ the waffle house @ 2:30 in the morning.
  8. genius_man16
    8. Posted by genius_man16 Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    bringing up last year and 5 years ago is so far from being equal it's not even funny. There isn't a single player left on the Nebraska roster from that 2004 squad. And there are at least 60 players still on the roster from last years Texas Tech squad.
    Nebraska will win this handily, especially behind their D. This will be the stingiest defense Tech faces all year, period, and I really hope that Sheffield makes his first road start against us.
  9. PHUC NUTT/as in houston
    9. Posted by PHUC NUTT/as in houston Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i know because i've had too much to drink, & popped too many xanax before winding up @ waffle house @ 2:30 in the morning (how i don't know), it must feel just like being the head coach of texas tech w/all 10-12 people's full attention on me. & the seriously hot stripper/ swing shift waitress (hey she's paying her way through college) now how can you compete w/that action. NO I DON'T WANT TO LEAVE LUBBOCK...........
  10. PHUC NUTT/as in houston
    10. Posted by PHUC NUTT/as in houston Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    how is any program in the BIG 12 other than Texas, or Oklahomo relevant in any conversation ? you should all be mute when grown folk's are talkin. the whole conference has been controlled by one, or the other for an entire decade. there is no need for a top 25, or purpose for other program's in the BIG 12 other than to play out their insignificant default scheduled game's. your like the retarded kid i saw running out of the bathroom flailing all around cause of someone's interpretation of van gogh's starry night done in finger poo. it just never get's old thinkin about the look on that kid's face.
  11. Christian
    11. Posted by Christian Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bottom line regardless of the past: Mike Leach always has a plan. He's a good coach and the Tech staff knows how to attack. The Nebraska defense is better but, as Coach Pelini says, still needs to improve. Shutting down a Blaine Gabbert is impressive on paper but add to that a gimp ankle and lots of rain. It deserves that apostrophe. With that said, the Nebraska secondary is the best it has been in a long time. It's faster, smarter, well-coached and attacks (something they've had serious trouble with the past couple years). And as with the Missouri game, the Nebraska front four know how to assert themselves, even with the wide split line of Tech. Nebraska will adapt to the pace of Tech and the Raider quarterbacks will get shaken. I give the Huskers the 10 to 14 point edge.
  12. venom_viper2142
    12. Posted by venom_viper2142 Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Stating the fact that there is a difference between Potts and Sticks I think he will go with Sticks. Also if you didn't see the Texas game that they lost or the Houston game that they should've won by atleast 14 points you should realize that this should be a one loss team and that they are a little better than you think. So it will be Tech 56-21.
  13. ChrisB
    13. Posted by ChrisB Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:48 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Texas Tech will be ranked next week TT 49 UN 24
  14. J.R. Gar2525
    14. Posted by J.R. Gar2525 Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:52 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hey " [profane] NUTT" your funny and homeless. You really ought not play with your poo, now wash your hands and go find a job. Nebraska is now like Texas A&M, One of Techs little biotches, a freeby, a gimme. Texas Tech 49 Nebby's 21.
  15. Todd
    15. Posted by Todd Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:53 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    texas tech gets destroyed
  16. PHUC NUTT/as in houston
    16. Posted by PHUC NUTT/as in houston Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:02 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    i can respect loyalty BIG 12er's. i would follow any program before i follow Texas, or Oklahoma. i can sympathize w/your being thrown under the Longhorn - Sooner bus year in year out. you must feel like your sh#$ting thru a screen door from getting it up your poop shoot w/no vasoline. the rest of the BIG 12 is the "fat girl" every group of hot ass has lingering around to make them stand out.
  17. kms0217
    17. Posted by kms0217 Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:13 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Texas Tech 49 Nebraska corndogs 21, now thats reality, not 2004 not 2008 but the now...Go Red Raiders.
  18. Brandon
    18. Posted by Brandon Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:52 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    There is a point here.... Need I mention Graham Harrel? Even the browns wouldn't pick him up (which in hind sight, couldn't have really hurt anything...)
  19. Brandon
    19. Posted by Brandon Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:53 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I can't say I'm really that impressed with their WR demeanor. 49ers were doing better before they signed that whiney [profane]. Browns passed on him too (which in hindsight, was NOT a bad idea) He should legally change his name to TO OCHOCINCO.
  20. PHUC NUTT/as in houston
    20. Posted by PHUC NUTT/as in houston Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:00 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    conversation's about both the contribution of techer's to the "browns", & "niner's" yeeeeeeesh
  21. Brandon
    21. Posted by Brandon Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:19 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    There was no contribution to the browns. They passed on both players.
  22. Mike H
    22. Posted by Mike H Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:59 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The fact that you think Potts and Sheffield are interchangeable proves that you haven't done your research. Sheffield had better stats than Potts after an identical number of attempts against New Mexico and shredded KSU for more long passes than Potts has completed all season. The line on that game was 14 - Tech won by 52. It does matter who plays Saturday. With Sheffield, we shock Nebraska. With Potts, we lose a la the Houston game. Watch some film, Hinton.
  23. the reds
    23. Posted by the reds Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:27 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I like the fact that sooners, horns, and huskers have all stepped in to blast tech here. someone is nervous :). the national media and obviously most of the posters here haven't seen tech play this season or just saw one game [and i don't blame you :)]. the fact is this is a different team with Sheffield at the helm, night and day different. I'll be curious to see how Sheffield does [assuming he starts] against a quality opponent like Nebraska on the road. i wouldn't put a lot of $$$ on this game folks...Tech just might surprsie you :).
  24. John
    24. Posted by John Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:42 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Harrell and Crabtree are worthless? Say what you will about them, but they beat NU every year they played. What does that say about the corn dogs? Nu scored a whopping 15 points against VT, and almost doubled that against Mizzou. Wow!! Really impressive offense you got there.

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers