Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:53 pm EDT
Phil Steele preaches it, the Wall Street Journal made it a headline, and now the Big Ten blog The Rivalry, Esq., looking askance at the long list of top-10 projections for Penn State, has made offensive line experience the centerpiece of its skeptical take on the Nittany Lions as pending flop of the year:
Offensive Line: Last year's offensive line had three All-Big Ten selections. It was the best line in the Big Ten and one of the best at Penn State in the last twenty years. They're gone. This will be a problem. Phil Steele compiled the data of returning starts by offensive linemen. I love these numbers. Obviously, it doesn't mean that the team with more returning starts will beat the team with fewer starts, but it does give hard data for my plow horses.
[...]
Big Ten -- Returning Offensive Line Starts
Minnesota: 102
Iowa: 99
Indiana: 84
Michigan: 76
Purdue: 68
N'western: 64
Ohio State: 62
Mich. State: 52
Illinois: 49
Wisconsin: 49
Penn State: 39Not good for Penn State, wouldn't you say?
The Wall Street Journal and Phil Steele would say, obviously, and it would be hard to disagree: One of the worst numbers in the country in any area can't be a positive.
But that's on top of a problem even diehard Lions have seen coming from a mile away: Penn State can't recruit offensive skill players. Scratch that -- PSU can recruit skill players, as evidenced by the extremely productive receiving trio of Derrick Williams, Jordan Norwood and Deon Butler the last four years. Those three alone accounted for 56 percent of the catches and 60 percent of the receiving yardage from 2005-08, shares that were consistent across all four seasons.
What contributions their replacements have made have been predominantly (though not entirely) of the garbage-time gimme variety, but inexperience is only one kind of problem. With the lead contributors gone, this is the moment Lion fans have been dreading since it became obvious that recruiting at the skill positions wasn't going to produce a clear heir apparent.
Aside from oft-suspended tight end Andrew Quarless, in fact, of the players who figure to touch the ball for the PSU offense on a regular basis this fall, none was rated higher than three stars by Rivals, and none had an offer from either of the other big recruiting guns in the Big Ten, Ohio State and Michigan. Only one, backup receiver James McDonald, chose Penn State over Notre Dame, and from his position on the depth chart, he doesn't figure to improve much on the seven catches he's hauled in over his first three years. The most productive returnees at receiver, Brett Brackett (right, in the Rose Bowl) and Graham Zug, are a converted quarterback and a walk-on recruited mainly by I-AA schools, respectively. The most talented receiver by those standards, Derek Moye, has three career catches, all in blowouts.
Lion fans will no doubt be the first here to point out that signing day projections are not destiny -- among the very few significant grabs to date by Brackett or Zug were big gains by both in last year's low-scoring win over Ohio State. (A 49-yard catch by Zug, one of his three non-blowout receptions of the year, set up a Lion field goal in the first half.) And neither of the two unquestioned stars of the attack, All-Big Tenners Daryll Clark and Evan Royster was particularly highly sought as a recruit; neither was Stephfon Green, who was productive as Royster's back-up. No doubt many concerns in Penn State circlues since January (and probably before) have already been quashed on that basis.
Still, even if you refuse to accept recruiting as a generally solid basis for forming expectations in lieu of better information, no top-10-ish team is as obviously vulnerable in as many areas as the Lions: Exceedingly green offensive line, entirely revamped secondary and mystery receivers who threaten to send last year's suddenly explosive offense scurrying back into its shell if they can't provide their potentially harried quarterback with a viable downfield outlet. I may wind up agreeing with them by the end of the summer, but the optimists so far either have a lot of faith in the Penn State brand, generally, in Clark and Rosyter, specifically, or in the persistent mediocrity of the rest of the Big Ten. (I guess playing Akron, Syracuse, Temple and Eastern Illinois outside of the conference really can take you places.)
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
22 Comments
1 - 22 of 22
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Bottom line is that penn state talent wise has not lost a that much through graduation, the inexperienced guys were better rated than that guys that have left. Experience wise they are strong were you want them. Up the middle From QB-RB-C-DT-LB-FS( our only experienced returning DB).
Report Abuse
Dunk, you make a good point about Powell. It will be interesting to see what he does this year. And forget Quarless. I'm done with him. Shuler will have more catches and more yards this season with less ability.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Oh and Robert-it's this year's seniors that were from a top 10 class, not last year.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
To put it gently, PSU's schedule is weak, but that might just give the O line and some of our WRs (including some highly ranked freshmen) needed experience. All that to say that I'm cautiously hopeful for this season.
Report Abuse
I'll also point you're attention to the fact that two of the three receivers that you ("you" being matt hinton) made a big stink about (Norwood & Butler) weren't recruited at all really by anyone. Norwood was a walk-on from state college high school for christs' sake...and those guys became the #1 & #3 all time reception leaders at Penn State. A little hindsight here, please...
As for the skill players...we have Clark, Royster, and Green all returning....wouldn't you say that that bodes well? I also like how no mention is made whatsoever about how Sean Lee, PSU's next in line to break all of the linebacker tackle records, returns this year. Just another biased anti-Big-Ten article.
I think that the only legitimate concern/point that is made in this entire article is about the O-line, which will be almost completely green, and which does worry me quite a bit. That is by far out weakest point. However, take notice to the fact that the 4 star recruits we did land were almost all on the O-line (like Scranton's Eric Shrive....the best Offensive linemen recruit in the nation last year). And as for the weak schedule, yeah, what are you gonna do? We played OSU at OSU last year...we get em' at home this year, yes...Syracuse blows (although they did beat notre dame last year)...but they're in the Big East, which is a big-6 conference. It's not our fault that that conference is terrible (maybe write an article about that...but oh that's right...it wouldn't be bashing the big-ten, so forget it I guess).
Listen Matt, stick to what you do best...writing your "dear diary" love letters about/to Tim Tebow. Exit the closet already...
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
That's a load of crap. And I'm a PSU fan.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Right, because there aren't any good players anywhere else in the country.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Brett Brackett, Graham Zug and Chaz Powell had a TOTAL rating of 7 stars.
I don't get it.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
We all enjoy reading Scout/rivals but don't take it as the absolute truth. Its essentially the Us Magazine of CFB recruiting.
Report Abuse
1 - 22 of 22