Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:34 pm EDT
There's been a lot of talk the last couple years about the Big Ten's national "image problem," and whether it exists after three very bad bowl seasons. Rhetorically, maybe, but on paper, it's hard to argue disrespect when the conference can still put a pair of teams in everybody's top-10 going into the year -- especially when both of those frontrunners, Ohio State and Penn State, both have so many holes to fill. It's no diss to drop the league bellwethers slightly off the national radar when they're both so riddled by attrition.
I don't like the conference wars. But I do know that when a conference with no apparent national contenders is called out en masse for lame scheduling by national headlines, as the Big Ten's "little five" were this week during ESPN's schedule-analyzin' extravaganza, that is not a P.R. victory:
Easiest Schedules
1. The little five
Indiana, Michigan, Northwestern, Penn State and Wisconsin hail from the Big Ten, but you wouldn't know it by glancing at their nonconference schedules. Combined, they play five FCS opponents, five smaller directional schools and only three opponents from BCS conferences (and that includes Syracuse twice). The five schools combined play only four non-Big Ten road games, and Michigan and Penn State don't play a single nonconference game away from home. ... No wonder Penn State coach Joe Paterno didn't want Notre Dame in the Big Ten. Why would he want to give up playing Akron, Syracuse, Temple and FCS opponent Eastern Illinois at home?
Dude: Burn. And, without conferring with Mark Schlabach, I assume the only games that kept the rest of the conference out of his walk of shame are these:
• Sept. 5: Illinois vs. Missouri (in St. Louis)
• Sept. 12: Southern Cal at Ohio State
• Sept. 12: Purdue at Oregon
• Sept. 19: Michigan State at Notre Dame
• Sept. 19: Arizona at Iowa
• Sept. 19: California at Minnesota
• Sept. 26: Notre Dame at Purdue
• Nov. 25: Illinois at Cincinnati
It's entirely possible that Illinois, Michigan State or Iowa will mount a stunning charge to the conference title, in which case wins over fringe top-25 outfits like Missouri, Cincinnati, Notre Dame or Arizona might ultimately serve them well in the polls and punditry. But realistically, with Michigan seemingly down for the count for another year, there are two contenders carrying the banner for the Big Ten nationally, and one of them -- Penn State -- has no claim to stake outside of the conference barring an all-time, miracle turnaround at Syracuse (which would be written off for occurring in the wide-open Big East, anyway). The Lions' "big game," their potential claim to national prowess, is Ohio State on Nov. 7. Fair or not, even if it's only based on perception, the top teams from the SEC and Big 12 have multiple shots at bagging big game within the conference, with the championship showdowns at the end to boot. The only really impressive head PSU can conceivably bring to the BCS belongs to Brutus.
And if that head is already bloodied by USC? How will Penn State or Ohio State offset that? With wins over Iowa? Michigan State? Who beat ... Arizona and Notre Dame?
I thought the Buckeye-Trojan tilt in the Coliseum last year was borderline cataclysmic for repudiating Ohio State's own reputation for big-game flops, which was cemented all too decisively in that disaster (and later in the Fiesta Bowl loss to Texas). Once they were humiliated on that stage, the Bucks had no chance of recovering a shot at the national championship. This year, minus almost everyone who touched the ball last year on offense and three draft picks from the defense, they don't have the same lofty expectations for themselves. Barring another surprise this year on the order of Oregon State's run following its loss to Penn State last year, I think it will be hard for the entire conference to recover from another Trojan romp in Columbus.
What the presumptive heavy hitters in this conference really need is another heavy hitter, and without another marquee out-of-conference game to boost teams like Illinois and Iowa on the fringes, USC is it. If the Buckeyes strike out again, it's going to be hard to prove -- for this year, anyway -- that the Big Ten is really the big leagues.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
18 Comments
1 - 18 of 18
Report Abuse
And Northwestern is Northwestern. No game against any other BCS conference team or quality non-BCS conference team is a gimme for them.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Way better than playing another cupcake. Think of the excitement!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Still, for all I'm in favor of ragging on Penn State's schedule, anyone claiming playing ND would be an upgrade over playing us might note the results on the field when we played the last time...
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
It's as easy as looking at their bowl records. they're a combined 4-11 in two years (1-6 in '08). For kicks, I'm going to throw UM's losses to Utah and App. St., because that signifies what's wrong with, and the Karmic effect, of the Big Ten(11)'s mission statement. They pretend to have "contenders", but it's all smoke and mirrors put up by the BCS machine.
The Big Ten(11) is dead set against a playoff. How can they lie about "prestige" and ""national title hopes" when they would, according to the averages, get their @sses handed to them in the first two rounds? It'd be hard to justify the talk when no one would make it to the semifinals.
Report Abuse
College football at the D-I level has been diverging for the past decade anyways, teams like OSU, USC, Florida, Texas and Oklahoma are taking away the most blue chip recruits, its not as even as it once was in the past. Teams are able to reload better, while others below will have a great team once or twice a decade then take years to rebuild another.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I'd still love to see those warm weather teams come play ball up in Big 10 country during late fall/early winter. USC plays a home game every time they're in the Rose Bowl.(The Rose Bowl is closer to USC then it is to UCLA) And the majority of those Big Bowl games seem to take place around those Florida schools too.(Anyone that doesn't think home field advantage plays a large part in college football probably doesn't watch the games all too closely)
Waaaahhhh Waaaahhhh. Another whiny brat. Hmm.... you state that the big bowl games take place around the Florida schools. Just a little FYI for you whiny Tiny Televeners: Florida beat the snot out of Ohio State IN ARIZONA which is closer to Columbus, Ohio (approximately 1920 miles) than it is to Gainesville, Florida (approximately 2050 miles). You want to make some more excuses for why you got your butts kicked? What next...are you going to blame it on the full moon, or maybe the color of Florida's jerseys gave them an unfair advantage over the color of Ohio State's jerseys, or maybe...just maybe...it is because Florida was the BETTER TEAM!!!! Just admit it, deal with it, and stop whining so much that the rest of us want to regurgitate. ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!! UF could have played in Arizona, or even Columbus, OH and they still would have beaten the pants off of OSU. Stop blaming your deficiencies on everything else. Be a man and take responsibility. They were not the better team when they played UF. They were not the better team when they played LSU, USC, Penn State, or even Texas (although I still think that Texas is lucky to have won that game...but that doesn't necessarily mean that OSU is that great, just that Texas was overrated). Grow a pair...be a man....and stop your whining. It is disgusting!
Report Abuse
1 - 18 of 18