Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

The pretentious kids have "Twilight," drooling sadists have the fascinating-because-it-exists "Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day," and college football fans have what Hollywood hopes will be their big cinematic date of the year this weekend with "The Blind Side," the glossy-looking adaptation of Michael Lewis' critically hailed 2006 book of the same name. Lewis wrote the best college football book of the decade by chronicling Michael Oher's transition from poverty to one of the most sought-out linemen in the country, first by college scouts and then by the NFL, and using Oher's position as a window into the evolution of the game and the increasing value of the rare specimen who can dominate at left tackle.

It was, in other words, very much a football book, with some gritty but ultimately uplifting sociology balancing the scales. When the first trailers appeared this summer, it was obvious what we were getting instead was a bit of by-the-numbers hokum that bordered on "chick flick" status and obliterated the scales with a metric ton of predictable sentiment:

But don't take my word for it, now that the professionals have had their say. And quite a few critics, actually, are willing to play along with the film's "feel-good" vibe: The Washington Post admires "a straightforward lack of cheap sentiment that saves it from being either too maudlin or saccharine-sweet," and the L.A. Times lauds director John Lee Hancock for giving the film "as much humor as heart." The Austin Chronicle and Boston Globe both praise Sandra Bullock for saving the movie from "cuddliness" and "emotional garishness," respectively; USA Today likes it "strong performances" and -- hark! -- "strong football scenes." The real-life couple depicted in the movie reportedly loves it; Kenneth Starr reportedly cried at the premiere. (Why was Ken Starr at the premiere of a schlocky football movie? Why not?)

Other, let's say headier publications, on the other hand, found the film's redemption story less "feel-good" and more "insidious" and "racist" in its central theme of "wide-eyed black naif finds his way only through the hard work and benevolence of middle-class white patrons," and didn't hold back:

Chicago Tribune: "Oher, portrayed as a near-mute saint by Quinton Aaron, has been sidelined in his own story. ... at its queasiest 'The Blind Side' veers perilously close to the concept of poverty tourism."

Portland Oregonian: "Author Michael Lewis wrote an absorbing book about Oher, tackling issues of race, class, religion and the evolution of gridiron strategy. ... which might make some fret that his tale would be massaged into a facile, feel-good fable that substitutes cliché for reality at nearly every turn. Sadly, they'd be right."

The Onion (A.V. Club): "In the character of "Big Mike" ... the film suggests a gentle, oversized puppy in need of adoption. (The family that takes him in literally picks him up from the streets during a rainstorm, like a stray. All that's missing are the children pleading, "Mom, can we keep him?")

The Village Voice: "In every scene, Oher is instructed, lectured, comforted, or petted like a big puppy; he is merely a cipher (Aaron has, at most, two pages of dialogue), the vehicle through which the kind-hearted but imperfect whites surrounding him are made saintlier. 'Am I a good person?' Leigh Anne asks Sean non-rhetorically—as if every second in this film weren't devoted to canonizing her."

So there you have it: "The Wire," it is not. If that's your standard for racially-charged rags-to-riches stories, you might want to skip the theater and check Netflix again to see if "The Hurt Locker" is available yet. But hey, maybe the coaches' cameos in "The Blind Side" will be worth it.

- - -
All reviews via Metacritic.

digg delicious
more

19 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. genius_man16
    1. Posted by genius_man16 Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:23 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    It seems to me that "The Village Voice" has the best take on the movie. It's not intended as racist at all, but the fact that Oher has (apparently) virtually no dialogue makes it incredibly easy to see it that way. It's sad because all that had to be done was simply give him more lines, and make him more of a central figure, which honestly should have been the case to begin with.
  2. joker3pbs
    2. Posted by joker3pbs Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:26 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I figured it would be a "praise the family because without this family he never would have made it and ended up a junkie" flick, so I decided to skip it. It's pretty hard to depict a story like this, especially with what little details Hollywood likes to include.
  3. Brandon
    3. Posted by Brandon Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:14 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I'm not ruining one of my favorite books by watching this trash. I hate you, Sandra Bullock.
  4. allhailcale
    4. Posted by allhailcale Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:29 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    That's Hedley!!!
  5. Chris
    5. Posted by Chris Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:57 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    This whole story is completely fabricated to begin with. Just a wealthy Ole Miss alumnus and booster with a grand idea to use Oher as a cash cow, plug his beloved university on an epic scale, and help to vanquish the stigma of racism that is pinned on Ole Miss.
    Im sure theres hundreds of homeless guys wandering in and around the Memphis area at the moment. No grand athletic abilities? Sean Tuohy gives less than a damn about you. He sure didnt give a crap about Ohers siblings, did he? So we are supposed to believe that Sean Touhy, a former Ole Miss athlete and very wealthy alum, adopted a huge black kid who, as it happened, couldn't make the grades at Briarcrest so he couldn't play football despite Freeze wanting him, out of the goodness of his heart? Sean Touhy, who once called a basketball player a thug on live radio? Then, amazingly, Hugh Freeze, his coach at Briarcrest, becomes an assistant at Ole Miss after the loving, Christan Touhys hooked Oher up with tutors and the BYU classes, all because he's such a damn good guy? Jesus Q. Christ, people are gullible, stupid, or both.
    The book and movie has so many lies in it that anybody who knows the Touhy situation knows it has been embellished and if he was a true saint, he would have adopted all the Oher kids. This was planned all along and Freeze and Briarcrest was all the rebel cigar boys needed to get another kid in school who probably wouldn't have gotten in had he not been a top prospect. The story is wonderful but unfortunately a lot of it is fiction.
  6. Will Q
    6. Posted by Will Q Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:31 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    With regard to the few lines Oher has in the movie: the powers behind the movie can claim (quite honestly) that they were just being true to the book. Michael doesn't say a lot. Unfortunately, I can really see it coming off in a bad way in the movie.
    Even if it does turn out to be uplifting, I'm really afraid that I'm going to hate the way this adaptation turned out. I thought the book was fantastic, and it could have been a groundbreaking movie if the filmmakers could have found a way to combine the rags-to-riches story with the social and sport commentary from the book.
  7. Doghouse Reilly
    7. Posted by Doghouse Reilly Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:33 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    The Chicago Tribune's reference to it as "poverty tourism" reminds me of the reaction that Precious got when it came out. Dark-skinned, near-mute loner is treated very poorly by other dark-skinned people; luckily, nice white/light-skinned people come along to make things better.
    White People: Making things better for black folks for over 500 years!
    I'd be less upset if, rather than making it a Sandra Bullock vehicle, they had a 'roided up Billy Bob Thornton play Coach O and tell the story from his perspective. Oh, and there was an (invented) scene where Michael Oher "excessively blocks" a Klan rally into freeway traffic.
  8. PurdueMatt
    8. Posted by PurdueMatt Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:52 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I am reading and enjoying the book. Don't think I'll see the movie because it looks like a Disney cookie cutter movie and because I can't stand Sandra Bullock.
  9. thronedoggie
    9. Posted by thronedoggie Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:01 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Wow. I think I'll watch this one and like it.
    I'm not nearly smart enough to know everything that I ought to know to hate it.
  10. Johnny
    10. Posted by Johnny Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:19 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Sounds like nobody will be happy with this movie until the 'whites' get out their whips and make the 'blacks' submit to their wishes.
    To bad, I really like sports movies since I really like sports. I never really expect a sports movie to be realistic. I get realistic when I actually watch the sport, ya know?
    But let's move forward and turn it all back to racism, which is where this country can't escape from EVER. Because nobody really wants to. Hate makes us feel REAL dangit, right? Let's just hate. Then hate some more. Then turn love into hate. Kill all love, create more hate.
    There is nothing good in this world. There are no good hearted people in this world. Just users and racists. Plus people who let users and racists take advantage of them because they are DUMB!
    Let's just hate everyone and be happy. I HATE EVERYONE HERE WHO POSTS!
    Peace
  11. sivyerb
    11. Posted by sivyerb Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:49 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I hate topholdem. I don't want to but I do.
  12. JosephineTX
    12. Posted by JosephineTX Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:49 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I'm not planning to watch this movie because the ads look terrible. Sandra Bullock looks really annoying, and they make the kid who plays Michael look like an idiot. If he's not supposed to be completely stupid, the filmmakers have failed somewhere along the way--he seems very Forrest Gump-esque in the commercials. God, I hated Forrest Gump! And yeah, what the Village Voice said.
    But those of you who've read the book have made it sound interesting, so I might read it.
  13. Melanie
    13. Posted by Melanie Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:19 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I haven't seen the movie yet, but I plan to. As others have noted, Michael not speaking much during the movie is true to the book. He literally just stared at people who tried to help him (at first) and woudn't speak. Also, while they did a good thing by helping a kid off of the streets, I found the Touhys (the parents, not the kids) incredibly annoying in the book, so I don't expect them to be otherwise in the movie.
    Incidentally, the family met Michael because he was in school with their kids. They didn't go troll the streets for a huge, homeless kid who looked like he would be a good football player, as other commenters have suggested. The book also makes no bones about Coach Freeze trying to steer Michael toward a college program that would also hire him.
    I find it sad and kind of pathetic that people are attacking this story and saying that it couldn't possibly be true. Go kick a puppy and leave this kid alone.
  14. Chris
    14. Posted by Chris Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:37 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Melaine.....you poor, naive soul.
  15. Melanie
    15. Posted by Melanie Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:00 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Chris, you truly would me. Mississippi State fan, I'm guessing.
  16. Melanie
    16. Posted by Melanie Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:00 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Er, wound me.
  17. Chris
    17. Posted by Chris Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:20 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Melanie.... Jumping to conclusions, are we? As an alum of Auburn University, why would I be a fan of your neighbor?
  18. Chris
    18. Posted by Chris Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:34 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Melanie, Ole Miss fan, I'm guessing. I can see where you would come to that conclusion that I'm an MSU fan though - because Ole Miss seems to be obsessed with MSU being obsessed with Ole Miss. As an alum of Auburn University, I could care less about the success or failure of any program within the State of MS. But you have to be one gullible idiot to truly believe this story is legit.
  19. Melanie
    19. Posted by Melanie Sun Nov 22, 2009 7:47 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Hey, ease up. I ventured a guess, and you're taking this a little too personally. This name-calling is why I typically don't comment on stories. That, and that it really irritates me when a fellow alum starts making Auburn look bad by calling a stranger a gullible idiot just because her opinion is different from his.

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers