Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

The coaching search continues at Tennessee, where Cincinnati's Brian Kelly has emerged as the leading candidate to succeed Phil Fulmer, according to a source in the Knoxville News. Vol blogger Mike Griffith says you can add Jim Leavitt's name to the list, and don't count out Lane Kiffin, either. It's early still.

But one name you can scratch off, according to Griffith: Mike Leach. Yes, he has his supporters. But they know what they want there in Tennessee, and this guy just doesn't fit that Volunteer mold:

Mike Leach still has his name thrown around, but I don't see it. No one is going to come into the SEC and win with Xs and Os -- it takes talent, not gadgets.

Gadgets, indeed: What is this ... this ... forward pass? This bizarre system of having the ball leave the quarterback's hands and travel an appreciable distance through the air to reach an open "receiver" at an extremely consistent rate might produce an unlikely undefeated record and No. 2 ranking where you are, sir. It might result in a system that's finished in the top-10 nationally in total and scoring offense nine years in a row, with five different lightly-recruited quarterbacks, in a program with zero record of national success and no recruiting footprint, in a conference that boasts five of the top 12 teams in the country this week.

But in the SEC? At an historic program where Leach would inherit players who by all rights should run most of his current squad out of the stadium? Preposterous. These gadgets -- this "passing" attack with system quarterbacks who have little shot at the next level -- they will never work in the South. They don't do gadget plays here.

And, I just don't see Leach (47) being able to handle the level of scrutiny that comes with the UT head football coach job. It's a regal position -- hardly a post for someone with erratic and eccentric personality traits.

Ay, Leach could never handle real media scrutiny like the kind he'd face in Knoxville, a true metropolis compared to Lubbock. A scruffy vagabond like Leach could never reach the level of regality achieved by those distinguished ambassadors of the Vol aristocracy for the last 32 years, Phillip Fulmer and Johnny Majors. Tennessee is no place for interesting people with proven track records of success and active, curious, wide-ranging minds.

Remember, Vols: You got to watch tricky lawyers like Mike Leach.

digg delicious
more

48 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Peachy
    1. Posted by Peachy Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    In America, first you get the gadgets, then you get the talent, then you get the trophies... (Because, really now - Homer's version is much snappier.)
  2. Lubbock Punk
    2. Posted by Lubbock Punk Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    mike griffith you have just proved yourself to be a complete idiot....enjoy your darwin award!!!
  3. Greg R
    3. Posted by Greg R Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I wondered how Tennesse would spin Leach's lack of interest.
  4. whytro
    4. Posted by whytro Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:45 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    if any percentage of tennessee fans share this attitude then they deserve their current standing now and into the future.
  5. Daxius
    5. Posted by Daxius Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wow, that's some big talk coming from a blogger for a team that has flat-lined recently. Now, if the Vols had been near the top the past few years, been able to win a few big games, and have their coach retire and not 'retire', then this argument might have some weight.
    Griffith, my man, you might want to engage the brain before blogging again. It tends to help with the thinking part of writing.
    BTW, are the bolded parts in the quotes from the actual blog?
  6. howarjo1943
    6. Posted by howarjo1943 Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Leach would seem like a weird fit at UT, but so did Urban Meyer at UF. It could work. Leach's system has already been proven to work in the SEC. When he was OC at UK with Hal Mumme, they lit up the scoreboard routinely against everyone. One thing Dr Saturday is completely WRONG about is the scrutiny bw the 2 jobs. UT football is basically the State of Tennessee's national pasttime. It is a larger school with more alumni and more sidewalk fans bc it is the state school. On the other hand, TT football is not nearly as important to nearly as many people.
  7. HERETIC
    7. Posted by HERETIC Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    After seeing what leach can do with a quarterback and what proball weiss does with his, its a wonder that notre dame hasen't come calling. but then mary magdalene's boys would have to have a bottomless pit for finances (which they probably have) buying out charlie boy and coaxing leach aboard by threatening him with excommunication should he refuse.
  8. HERETIC
    8. Posted by HERETIC Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    In reply to john b: the school colors of texas tech are really those of notre dame. mary magdalene was mostly painted in red and black. it is thought by many that the european cathedrals of old named notre dame, actually referred to the magdalene. leach might be tricked into going to south bend if that school changed its school colors to what they actually are. besides, the naval academy wears their blue and gold much better.
  9. RichmondTXREDRAIDER
    9. Posted by RichmondTXREDRAIDER Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Tech and Leach nearly have an agreement already that will keep him in Lubbock and make him one of the top salaried coaches in the Nation. Leach wanted a contract extension before the season started when he knew he had a National Championship caliber team. Why? He wanted to stay at Tech and build a dynasty. Kent Hance has made it clear that Leach is his coach even though the school wanted to wait until after the season. Remember he has two more years on his current contract so it wasn't like he was without one after the season. GO TECH BEAT OU!!!!
  10. BLT
    10. Posted by BLT Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    To the naysayers out there, Texas Tech doesn't use a "gadget" offense. They don't deceive defenses with multiple formations, options, reverses (rarely if ever). They simple get in 4-5 WR sets, shotgun and throw the bloody ball. There's no secret, no having to stop the Red Raider quarterbacks from running 100+ yards a game on em. It's simply drop back, find a receiver and throw. If that's a gadget offense, I want to learn how to do that. Tennessee isn't getting the job done their way...perhaps they should try it another way?????
  11. BLT
    11. Posted by BLT Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    to the naysayers out there, texas tech doesn't use a "gadget" offense. they don't deceive defenses with multiple formations, options, reverses (rarely if ever). they simple get in 4-5 wr sets, shotgun and throw the bloody ball. there's no secret, no having to stop the red raider quarterbacks from running 100 yards a game on em. it's simply drop back, find a receiver and throw. if that's a gadget offense, i want to learn how to do that. tennessee isn't getting the job done their way...perhaps they should try it another way?????
  12. Greg R
    12. Posted by Greg R Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Leach NEVER uses a 5 WR set. He ALWAYS keeps a back in the backfield. They change formations only on audibles and use motion at most 10% of the time and even then it is almost always the SE. Leach beats you because he knows that he only has 20 hours a week and he maximizes repetition and execution of the same basic plays out of different formations.
  13. josh_lky13
    13. Posted by josh_lky13 Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What gadget plays, what gadget offense? .......has Tennesse ever seen a TTU game. this is an offense that spreads the ball to as many players as possible intended to take what ever the defense gives you. I hate the fact it is considered a gimmick offense or that all of our quarterbacks are just products of a system. They never say that about a running back who gets 75% of the plays. I am more of a traditionalist but this offense works. With any luck Leach will plan to stay and help grow this program. Only then will we get some respect form something other than the BCS computer polls.
  14. BLT
    14. Posted by BLT Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I don't give a rats rump if he uses no-backs, 1-back or 13-back sets. The fact is, they aren't a gadget offense. There's nothing complex about their offense. They are going to throw the ball all over the place. There's absolutely NO deception or gadget about it. Florida is a gadget offense. Utah is a gadget offense. They use multiple sets, multiple motions and try and deceive the defense as much as humanly possible. Texas Tech just doesn't do that. It's quite simple...they throw the [profane]ing ball. I just don't see how anyone can say throwing the ball all the time is a gadget? I'm assuming that if you line up in the I-formation and run the ball 90% of the time, kick someone's arse all over the place, that it, too, is a gadget offense?
    Ahhh - I get it now. The people who are saying it's a gadget offense have never played football, have they? They are following in the footsteps of Greeny, who could never play sports so he thinks he's an expert and announces them. It's all so clear now.
  15. Jim F
    15. Posted by Jim F Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    As a true Tennessee fan 80% of UT fans want Mike Leach and his gadgets only the people who think they are elite don't want him. The rest of us are begging hjm to come.
  16. gtne91
    16. Posted by gtne91 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Brian T,
    People call Georgia Tech's offense a gadget offense too. What is gadgety about running at you nearly every play? It is interesting though that Johnson and Leach have both noted the similarities between their offenses, despite the difference in run/pass ratio.
  17. leesgirl
    17. Posted by leesgirl Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Seriously, could you guys not see the sense of humor in this article. This was one of the funniest and by far the best article about football I have read in the last 5 yrs.
    Very, very good article. Nice writing. Excellent use of sarcasm in written words. Ignore the comments of the people who don't know how to read feeling from the perspective of the writer.
    Excellent work
  18. Steve G
    18. Posted by Steve G Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:15 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    First of all, on the "other UT": One joke says it all. Why do the Vols wear orange? So they don't have to change for when they go pick up trash along highways on Sunday.
    On Leach: He and Tech are a fit for each other. And the talk about his "gadget offense" is BS. I think his playlist is written on a bar napkin. Harrell has the playlist memorized but probably needs a program on his sleeve so he can remember what number belongs to which receiver. Their offense is the football version of the offense of the old Boston Celtics, which was three basic plays, 5 or 6 nuances or decisions to each play, practiced endlessly to perfection. This is very tough for a college team to master but Harrell, Crabtree and company have it down. The only way to beat Tech is to score big and outscore them because they can't be stopped except maybe by bad weather. OU should hold a rain dance Friday night or plan to score 60.
    Not a question of whether he would be a fit in Knoxville - he ain't leavin'.
  19. Gary B
    19. Posted by Gary B Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Obviously this writer has never played ball before. The object of the game is to get the ball into the endzone. If everyone knows its a system, then how come no one can stop it. Being the Sooner fan that I am, I hope we stop it just enough this weekend. But a Tech offense with an SEC defense......hmmmm that's kinda scary.
  20. Zack
    20. Posted by Zack Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This blog is soaked with sarcasm. I can't believe some of you can't realize it.
  21. HILLTOPPER
    21. Posted by HILLTOPPER Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The SEC is way overrated this year. No decent offenses with the exception of Florida. Most of the defenses couldnt stop a JUCO team. Suck it up SEC fans you not the toughest conference just the most overhyped.
  22. BILL C KINSEY J
    22. Posted by BILL C KINSEY J Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    this guy thinks when tennesee gets a "classy" coach, all will be fine. i hope they continue with this thinking because it's a recipe for failure. guys like leach are innovative and their team is fun to watch. i think leach could go anywhere (including tennesee) and be very successful. when he was the offensive coordinator at Oklahoma in 2000 they won the national championship. after that, it was pretty dull without mike leach. i was and am still a big OU fan, but they aren't nearly as fun to watch as when leach was there.
    where do we get these guys that write these stories? they need to change professions and write fiction novels.
  23. GP
    23. Posted by GP Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Love the sarcasm---you know, the stuff that many of the comment posters missed. Good article, albeit Lubbock is a little bigger than you imply.
  24. GP
    24. Posted by GP Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    On another note...if you want to talk "gadgets" talk Boise State. They can't play a football game without using three or four trick plays.
  25. gtne91
    25. Posted by gtne91 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I dont think any of the posters missed Hinton's sarcasm.

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers