Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:37 pm EDT
The fourth-quarter personal foul call against Arkansas' Malcolm Sheppard immediately preceding a Florida touchdown that tied the game at 20 was a bad call -- a ridiculous call, actually, in an era increasingly defined by the emphasis on "protecting the player":
But it was a routine ridiculous call; that is, it didn't have any obvious, direct influence on the outcome. It was only second down, there were more than nine minutes to go in the game and Florida had already driven within field goal range. The flag didn't alter the fact that Arkansas kicker Alex Tejada hooked the second of two crucial missed field goal attempts moments later, or that Florida drove into position for the winning kick with no flags or controversy whatsoever on its next possession. No one was hurt, and Sheppard wasn't ejected. It was your garden variety bad call during the course of the game.
But in its effort to fuel the indignation of jilted fans everywhere, the SEC has elected to publicly set the record straight on a specific, controversial call for the second time in three weeks:
Every Monday, the league reviews calls from its games as standard procedure. It released a statement Monday saying, "After video review, there was no evidence on the video to support the personal foul penalty called on Arkansas midway through the fourth quarter."
The subtext: This reprimand/correction was levied against the same crew that was publicly corrected by the league office two weeks ago for the universally reviled excessive celebration penalty against Georgia's A.J. Green following a late, go-ahead touchdown in the Bulldogs' eventual loss to LSU. Not exactly a vote of confidence when the same crew suits up Saturday for Alabama-Tennessee.
The weird thing about the conference's correction of the call against Green was that it declined to comment on the identical call against LSU's Charles Scott a few seconds later. Again, the decision to address the call against Sheppard today was accompanied by a refusal to comment on the equally controversial call that preceded it, a ticky-tack (at best) pass intereference against Arkansas cornerback Ramon Broadway, because that was "a judgment call," and "a review of those calls have been communicated to Arkansas." (There was no comment on the no-call on a possible offensive pass interference -- pictured -- against Cooper that might have prevented an interception, either.) And deciding whether or not a specific hit or celebratory gesture falls within the bounds of acceptable sportsmanship isn't a "judgment call"?
In the same way that the Big Ten has backed itself into a corner by requiring suspensions for every last stray hit, if the SEC is going to bother undermining public confidence in its officials for every random bad call, it has to set the record straight on all the calls, or else refer to them all as "judgment calls" and keep the review/correction process in-house with the emphasis on getting them right in the future and let the fans complain about being jobbed like every group of losing fans after every close loss ever.
Complaining about the refs is an inherent, time-honored aspect of losing -- most of us accept this by age 13 or so -- but there's no reason in this case the SEC couldn't have publicly called the flag against Sheppard a "judgment call" and communicated the results of that review to Arkansas; it didn't carry the urgency of a last-second decision that directly, obviously affected the outcome with no time to overcome it. (See, for an example of that kind of call, the Missouri-Colorado "fifth down" play, or the infamous Oklahoma-Oregon onside kick in 2006, which explicitly prevented Oklahoma from kneeling down for the win.) Constantly validating run-of-the-mill complaints accomplishes nothing, and only makes the officials job that much harder in the future -- "Hey, good luck in Tuscaloosa, fellas, and remember: If you're a little quick on the draw again when Rolando McClain pops Jonathan Crompton along the Tide sideline, you're going to hear about it from them and next Monday's press release. Have a great time!"
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
42 Comments
1 - 23 of 42
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
A review on Monday does nothing to affect the W-L record... but the biased call does keep THE CHILDS team unbeaten on Saturday
[THIS CAN APPLY TO ANY ONE OF THE BAD CALLS AND THE P.I. NON-CALL]
On the notion that the call did nothing to alter the outcome... to that point in the game, the Hogs had slowed down the Gators enough to force three FG attempts after reaching the Red Zone- so who knows what could have happened. Then there's the issue of MOMENTUM and crowd factor.
I'm just sayin'... this is what the Big XII officials were doing a few years ago... maybe its cyclical.
*******
If anyone actually paid attention to USC earlier this year, rather than just talk the smack, the Trojans lost to a team coached by their former Offensive Coordinator. Who does Florida play this week?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The call was Personal Foul, I don't think that's the right call if it's just for taunting but I'm not 100% sure. It's also worth noting that right as Sheppard is making the gesture there is an umpire about 5 feet away looking right at him, and his reaction is to keep walking as if there was nothing remarkable.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Florida loses a close game (Ole Miss, '08) and vows to henceforth work harder than any other team.
Arkansas loses a close game (Fla '09) and complains about the refs.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
All that being said Florida has been on the other end of the calls in past years (FSU, UT) and I have no shame in being on the other end this year.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
What I like to see abolished (or at LEAST tweaked) is the college instant replay system! The coaches have no say in the calls and in the last 2-3 seasons you see a lott of scenarios like these; 94% of the replays will involve a play on the field that may require it IF the angle requires it (i.e. fumble, a ball carriers foot touches the sideline, etc...) but everyone can see it on TV and 85% of the people in the stands can see it clearly as well. Also there happens to be 2, sometimes 3 refs that are right there on the play, see everything they need to clearly, and then make the right call. But then there is the cretin in the replay booth, (for what reason god only knows!) wants to review the play. Everyone on the field is wandering around, everyone in the stands is sitting around waiting...Then 5 minutes later, the ref comes out and states that state what should be obvious to any moron - That the play on the field stands! This will usually happen 1-3 or 4 times (usually depending on the quality of the crew) a game, delaying the game by minutes instead of seconds! Plus it is also the NCAA actually admitting that they don't even trust their own refs to make good calls! Even when there are two, maybe three of them, that have seen the play clearly!
5% is the customary bad call by the replay guy who must be watching some other completely different game than the one that is playing in front of him (i.e.The jumbotron shows clearly with anyone with 20/200 vision that the knee was down, but the replay guy thinks otherwise) 1% of the time it actually does what it was called to do!
I
1 - 23 of 42