Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:27 am EDT
As always: The ACC is dead. Long live the ACC!
Georgia Tech 30, Clemson 27. I'm sure I'm not alone here, but as entertaining and draining as it was, any coherent narrative of this game eludes me. Georgia Tech's overall night looks pretty sensational on paper -- 30 points, 420 total yards on almost seven yards per snap -- but the reality is that the last three quarters were fairly grim: After racing out to a commanding 21-0 lead in the first frame, Tech scored nine points the rest of the night. Consider also that two of those early touchdowns were on smart/opportunistic yet fairly fluky plays (a "surprise" pooch punt returned for a touchdown and a fake field goal that caught the Tigers napping) that you only get a couple times in a season, and the offense almost seems disappointing. The Jacket O only put the ball in the end zone once, on a one-shot, 82-yard run on their first carry of the game.
Once they woke up, the Tigers seemed like the better team, and the Clemson defense in particular deserves a tremendous amount of credit for the stunning 27-0 run for the lead: After letting Anthony Allen race free down the sideline on that opening pitch, the Tigers effectively held Tech to a field goal attempt (the fake that went for a touchdown to Demaryius Thomas) followed by six straight punts and an interception. For the most part, Tech QB Josh Nesbitt was worse as a passer than Reggie Ball ever was; at one point early in the fourth quarter, Nesbitt had completed more passes to Clemson (two) than to his own receivers (one) and had a negative efficiency rating. While the Tigers scored on each of their first four drives of the second half -- which I defy you to imagine happening under similar circumstances under Tommy Bowden -- Tech struggled to sustain anything, even to keep its head above water.
So at the risk of sounding vague and weaselly, I really think the Jackets' most admirable quality was old-fashioned opportunism: They were aggressive in all phases early and earned their big plays by taking a couple smart risks on special teams that left the Tigers looking dazed and flat-footed; and after being trounced in all phases for a full quarter-and-a-half and often looking like they were too cramped or exhausted to move, they responded to losing the lead with back-to-back field goals to tie and then win -- their first sustained drives since early in the second quarter. On the heels of a nightmarish night passing, Nesbitt actually completed a long pass on each of those marches; in between, the defense forced Clemson to punt for the first time since the second quarter to set up the game-winning kick. Again, I don't know how to define a team that wins with a blitzkrieg out of the gate and a slog down the stretch, while nearly coming apart at the seams in-between, except to say that is has really great timing. We'll see how long that lasts.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
12 Comments
1 - 12 of 12
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
wha? So when I say some team won 70% of their games, that doesn't mean anything to you? (since winning=1 and losing=0 are extremes)
Report Abuse
Jesse Palmer kept calling Tech's offense the "spread option." Isn't that incorrect? I thought it was the flexbone or the triple option. The spread option is when you have 4 receivers out wide and run the option with the QB and RB, right? How can an ESPN analyst make such a glaring mistake?
Report Abuse
I do think the outcome of the game would have been different if that iffy holding call weren't made on Parker's long pass late in the 4th.
Report Abuse
I do think the outcome of the game would have been different if that iffy holding call weren't made on Parker's long pass late in the 4th.
Report Abuse
So I guess Palmer wasn't wrong to say "spread," since you can't be wrong about a term that's ceased to have any precise meaning.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
wide line splits
no tight ends
4 wideouts
GT's slots arent as wide at Texas Techs, but they are still wideouts.
Johnson's rationale, I think, comes from the derivation of the offense. When he became OC at Ga Southern, he inherited a Run and Shoot team and added option runs to it. At Air Force, they "broke the bone" and shifted the running backs up into the slots. Since Johnson started with a spread offense and just called different plays out of it, he considers it an "option based spread". The formations are similar to Leach's. The fact that it looks like the AF flexbone is just coincidence.
I think it is also why there is confusion every time Johnson mentions implementing the run and shoot. To him, all of GT's pass plays are run and shoot plays. No matter how ineffective.
Report Abuse
Isn't it possible he rallies this team down the stretch? They're probably favored in the next four games, Miami and Florida State are tossups, and their offense is too good not to beat Spurrier's South Carolina team. That could mean a possible reunion game against GT in the ACC Conference Championship. I'm guessing that'll be a lot more watchable than last year's game.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Why don't you breakdown Miss State and Kentucky, those stellar SEC programs. Does Vandy have SEC speed too??? How'd they get beat by Duke last year then....Do you not remember how bad Auburn and Tennessee STUNK last year. They stunk worse than their trailor trash fans. Vols looked awful on saturday, couldn't even watch it was so horrible.
Oh by the way, South Carolina is terrible. Notice that NC State held them to 7 points while that SEC speed defense at Georgia couldn't stop their mascot? UGA is heading down -- lost to the same team that got beat by Houston @ home??? Florida is legit but, will UF ever play a real opponent? Ole Miss in the top 10 is the greatest farce in college football today. Bama and LSU -- legit as well -- and no one wants to watch them on TV. That LSU Vandy game really lit up ESPNU....I think Bama's game was radio only.
I'd rather watch the ACC my friend. Trailor trash SEC just aint as exciting as it used to be --
1 - 12 of 12