Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:50 pm EDT
The last word on the season's most pressing topics.
Since some people are beginning to take a step back and ask, What is the Michigan story really about? that seems like the relevant question of the week. To me, the story -- or stories -- is that nothing good has happened to Michigan since it hired Rich Rodriguez, and at least a few people close to the program are strongly suggesting that's the coach's fault.
Literally nothing good has happened. What? Beating Minnesota? A passable spring game by 180-pound freshman quarterback? It's been a tough slog for Michigan fans. But none of the trials to date have been personal; almost none of last year's collapse or the accompanying angst was specifically on Rodriguez. You could see all of that coming before he held a single practice: New quarterback, new running back, new receivers, four new offensive linemen. Five departing draft picks yielded to five freshman starters, none of whom was Terrelle Pryor. (Or even Ryan Mallett). The quarterbacks were overmatched and had no support; the young talent was unsuited not only for Rodriguez's vaunted system but apparently for any system. They couldn't even hold on to the ball for a large portion of the season.
So, okay, those are the circumstances, uncontrollable. The loss to Toledo was especially bad, but surely no coach of any caliber could have made a credible soup from ingredients that were still years from ripening. And there was Appalachian State under the previous regime, anyway, and the team more or less recovered from that. This is why anyone suggesting during the offseason that Rodriguez might be anywhere in the vicinity of the proverbial hot seat was so off-base, and was met with such derision from Michigan fans. 2008 = Disaster under any and all circumstances. Rodriguez went 3-8 his first year at West Virginia and won at least eight games the next six years in a row. Pete Carroll was 6-6 his first year at USC. These things happen. It's a mulligan, and an understandable one. Now, with his system and more of his players in place, 2009 was the year Rodriguez really went on the record.
And I think that's still true, for the most part, with the key difference that the Free Press report, whatever its motives, has ">made the stakes personal. And with that, the make-or-break nature of the coming season is enormously amplified.
Saturday's report was a clear rebuke to the narrative of circumstance in favor of a narrative of responsibility. The specific allegations and potential sanctions mattered far less than the voices leaping off of the page/screen to grab readers by the lapels and shake them and say, "Do you see? The program is dishonestly administered and rife with dissent. It's not just bad timing. It's performance. It's him."
I can't put words in the Freep reporters' mouths in terms of intent -- they've answered some questions themselves -- but I can measure effects, and it's clear enough that Rodriguez took it personally on Monday. Obviously Michigan fans are taking it personally:
So this is bizarre after everything. But this year one of the many, many reasons I want Michigan to win ... will be a new one. I'll be rooting on a personal level for Rich so he can have a press conference during which he can make an awkward comment about all this with a smile on his face, and I can wince inwardly at it.
That's just the most prominent voice in a growing bunker mentality that's quickly evolved from more de facto defenses of their coach to something like a movement to defend the program's honor. In that sense, the fan base -- or at least some substantial, heavily invested segment of it -- is probably much more united behind Rodriguez that it's been at any point until now. If there is a clash of New vs. Old, there's a good chance the crowd for Saturday's opener with Western Michigan will lean far more vocally toward the New.
This will last as long as the team keeps its head above water. It won't be lost on anyone in the Big House that the last two times the Wolverines hosted a feisty but nominally outmanned underdog in the home opener, they left the stadium at 0-1 with the season unfurling in front of them in all its sobering doom. The one thing Michigan needs right now more than anything is optimism, which has been wholly missing now for two full years. None of the old excuses apply Saturday, which will have to be the most satisfying victory over a MAC opponent in the long history of Michigan football -- not because beating Western Michigan means anything, but because, with the stakes raised and battle lines beginning to form, Rodriguez and his backers cannot afford another loss.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
21 Comments
1 - 21 of 21
Report Abuse
1. Over signing isn't against NCAA rules. If it was infact a violation...more teams than Alabama would be in a lot of trouble.
2. Practicing over the allowed hours laid out by the NCAA is in fact cheating. You are gaining a HUGE competitive edge over your opponent by breaking the rules and practicing more.
3. UM fans liked to throw out that Bama claimed that EVERYONE over signed....i thinks its funny now that UM blow hards are saying the same thing about this...
4. UM also liked to throw mud at bama fans and say that we/ Saban lacked moral fiber because our coach would allow a player to seek more playing time at another school....Funny thing is...forcing players to participate in "voluntary" workouts and by doing so, putting their ability to go to class in jeopardy is also on the proverbial moral teter toter...
Michigan fans...how does pay back taste exactly?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And if you think "voluntary workouts" don't happen at most D1 schools, well that shows your ignorance to the game of college football.
Good lord your #2 reason just cracks me up, seriously....wow I am glad I read this because it started my day off right, thanks for that buddy!
Report Abuse
There is no defending the passed being used for the word past. There no defending allowing this blunder to be missed in editing unless of course no editing is ever done.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Not all players are dumb as bricks, look at a guy like Larry Fitzgerald. Talk about the ultimate professional!
Report Abuse
This coach is out of his league and I don't see the program "bouncing" back while he is still roaming the sidelines. That being said, I hope the University offers him a lifetime contract much like the one ND gave to Weis!
GO BUCKEYES!!!
Report Abuse
Second. Richard Rodriguez is a dirt merchant. I hate when someone says this BUT as someone involved with College Football, particularly the Big Ten, I have some inside knowledge of the fact that at the NFL combine Pat White said that he "hated playing for Rich Rodriguez" which echoed the sentiments of Steve Slaton the year prior. Terrelle Pryor's (OSU) recruitment, as well as Kevin Newsome's (PSU), led to the spurning of Rich Rod's program over doubts of his level of trustworthiness. Combine this with the accounts of the players that have since left UM's program since his arrival regarding the (politically correctly stated) "direction of the program" and how it was not particularly admirable or in their interests to stay. Furthermore, look at the academic prowess of WVU while Rodriguez coached there, which came in at a 64% graduation rate, in a program not heavily affected by early departures.
Rodriguez is a coach who is concerned only with winning, at the cost of academics, player safety, general decency, etc. If i sound frustrated, or just generally offended - I am. It is a disgust to have him involved with the Big Ten. However, there is no one more to blame that the UM athletic program as well as university head. They are reaping that which they sewed now.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
http://mgoblog.com/diaries/impact-alabamas-oversigning
Report Abuse
and, just because i found it too funny (#17):
"it is not proper to begin a sentence with a preposition!! To get back on topic," ^^^
oops... you don't say...
Report Abuse
and, just because i found it too funny (#17):
"it is not proper to begin a sentence with a preposition!! To get back on topic," ^^^
oops... you don't say...
Report Abuse
1. It was not a violation, but if it was ethical, why would the SEC have instituted a cap that's lower than the amount signed by Alabama?
2. We can all wait to see for sure, as Michigan has brought in an outside investigator who actually went to school at Ohio State, but I think you're in for a surprise.....I think we'll find that Michigan did not, in fact, cheat.
3. Everyone did not oversign. Michigan, and in fact, the entire Big Ten did not oversign. However, I can guarantee that Alabama's players put in more hours than the NCAA mandated "maximum" through voluntary time. Same as Michigan.
Also, to mahjede in post #12...perhaps you missed the fact that Rich Rod's team put up its highest GPA since they began tracking it 20 years ago. Oops, there goes that theory...
1 - 21 of 21