Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:18 pm EDT
Two teams. Team A narrowly defeats a defending division champion and consistent powerhouse that came in ranked in the top 25 by every significant outlet, and by most insignificant ones. Team B is completely crushed by a supposedly borderline outfit with a 6-10 conference record the last two years and that barely snuck onto one of the major preseason ballots while being left out of the other entirely. So which team is "better"?
However the coaches in the USA Today poll define it, Team A -- otherwise known as UCLA, opportunistic conquerer of the coaches' 18th-ranked team in the preseason, Tennessee, on Monday night -- remains superior to Team B, Clemson, which demonstrated precisely zero positive attributes against the very same Alabama team the coaches narrowly omitted from their initial ballot. The Tigers come in No. 22 in the Coaches poll, released today, four spots in front of the Bruins, who head the "Also Receiving Votes" category at No. 26. What a country!
The AP avoids falling victim to the same formulaic shuffling ("they lost bad, so a ten-spot drop seems about right . . . ") by relegating Clemson to the also-ran bin and ascending the Bruins to No. 23. It also rewards Alabama's big win more robustly, bumping the Tide from unranked to No. 13, where the coaches move Bama from 24th to 17th.
There's one thing they can both agree on: Southern Cal is totally, totally awesome. Whatever reservations the pollsters had about the Trojans that kept them from ranking SC No. 1 last month were thoroughly absolved by the monsoon of cardinal and gold touchdowns in Charlottesville. And by "reservations," I mean "Mark Sanchez." The sometimes sketchy offense looked good enough for the coaches to slide USC ahead of Georgia into the top slot, and for the AP to pull the rare double jump, bouncing SC from third to first, ahead of UGA and Ohio State. The Trojans were brilliant pretty much all the way around, although maybe the voters also had Beanie Wells' foot and Georgia's big lineman injuries in mind. And they do know Virginia was going to be terrible no matter who the Cavs played, right?
- - -
Photo of Stafon Johnson and teammates celebrating via Getty Images.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
10 Comments
1 - 10 of 10
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
What I really want to know is why no ECU love? They knocked off a top 20 team. South Carolina beat a nobody and snuck into the rankings, and Utah was trying to give the game back to an awful looking Michigan- I'd rather see some Purple Pirate love if just for the fact that their game was actually watchable.
Report Abuse
i would expect ecu to turn up in tafkasmq's ballot. i also expect west virginia to beat them by 20, and then we can go back to ignoring them.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I hear JoePa tried to pay off Mark Richt as well, but the Bulldogs refused to take a dive against the notoriously tough Georgia Southern. Except Jeff Owens. (I kid, I hope Owens comes back next year.)
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
SC (the wanna be USC) will probably lose to every team that finishes with a winning record.
They couldn't do anything against NCST , who was playing 2nd string QB, and 3rd string RB and this was at home.
The crowd was SILENT, realizing how bad they looked , till NCSt gave them the ball twice inside the 15 .
Report Abuse
1 - 10 of 10