Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:00 pm EST
Back at the end of September, Boise State hit No. 5 in both major polls, and a round of stories came out wondering, "Wait a minute -- can Boise State play for the national championship?" The consensus then was "No," because of the Broncos' sketchy schedule, and with the scorn of the BCS computers dropping Boise all the way to seventh in the latest standings (last among the nation's seven unbeaten teams), nobody is even asking that question anymore.
In fact, with a remaining lineup of Louisiana Tech, Idaho, Utah State, Nevada and New Mexico State diluting the Broncos' strength of schedule even further and keeping them firmly off the national radar over the last five weeks of the regular season, the WAC is shilling for a public relations firm to help keep Boise in the mix for any big-money game, period:
The role of Scott Peyron & Associates is to keep Boise State in the forefront of the minds of the media. It does not lobby voters or coaches. It does email a weekly list of talking points regarding Boise State's accomplishments to members of the national media. It also sets up interviews for WAC commissioner Karl Benson and prepares statistical information for him to use to make a case for the Broncos.
"We've found that people just want to go back to the Fiesta Bowl win in 2007 and talk about that being a fluke and haven't really done their research in terms of [Boise State's] home game winning percentage or other interesting facts over the years," said Doug Cole, a group practice leader with the firm.
Boise may be right to be worried: If the rest of the season plays out as expected, the Broncos will forfeit the lone automatic BCS bid for high-ranking non-"Big Six" teams to TCU; assuming the SEC runner-up is assured of landing in one of the other three at-large slots, that potentially leaves Boise to fend for one of the other two against heavyweights USC, Notre Dame and the winner of Saturday's Ohio State-Penn State showdown, any of which is capable of overcoming the Broncos' advantage in the polls with guarantees of big ticket sales and TV ratings (and the WAC's history with at-large opportunities suggest the bowls will go for the sure thing). If TCU keeps winning, even the highest ranking in school history won't guarantee Boise a berth. But maybe the Peyron and Associates can bridge the gaps the ranking in and of themselves cannot.
This has been a persistent issue for Boise State in the past, of course (see their BCS snubs behind undefeated Utah in 2004 and again last year, when undefeated teams were relegated to the Liberty and Poinsettia bowls, respectively) and will continue to be until it buffs up its non-conference schedule enough to overcome the always dicey WAC slate -- a tall order when most prestigious opponents want nothing to do with BSU, for obvious reasons. The Broncos are opening up next season against Virginia Tech in Washington, D.C., but have no "Big Six" conference schools on their 2011 schedule and seem to be running into walls in every direction in their effort to add one. Either way, frankly, if the same walls are still standing after four unbeaten regular seasons in six years and arguably the biggest regular-season win in school history this year, over Oregon -- and there's a good chance that the Ducks might eventually jump BSU in the polls if the keep winning, as they already have in the computer polls -- I can't imagine a realistic scenario in which they're going to come down.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
116 Comments
1 - 25 of 116
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
But don't want to disrespect BSU. They do what they are supposed to do, Win. But I have heard different reports that they turned down games with the big boys. Heard USC tried to schedule them...but I don't know all the facts.
If they want more respect, they are going to have to schedule LSU, Texas, USC, Florida...etc.. or try and join the Pac 10 somehow.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
It seems (and it's only "seems" as I haven't done any real analysis) that any argument in favor of keeping BSU out is an argument in favor of the way that the BCS does things - which is sure-fire gonna get you run out of town if you do it for any reason other than to dis Boise State : )
(N.B. - No affilation; I'm a Tider, myself)
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And it's quite possible that instead of Boise vs. USC, or Boise vs. Notre Dame, the decision could be Boise vs. Iowa (if Ohio State wins out), or Boise vs. Miami, or something else. And then maybe the publicity will help.
Report Abuse
The Pac-10 doesn't want them. They're not a research university. Any other bright ideas?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
HOWEVER, in order to get some of the marquee games, they have had to rearrange the schedule with their other opponents, which results in some potential match ups falling by the road if re-scheduling is not possible.
Hence the fill-in games against the D-2 type teams, (U Cal Davis / Tex St), that drop their SOS.
The problem is real, but I sincerely doubt that BSU could not schedule even ONE AQ BCS game in 2011.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
@8 Join the cartel pretty much makes Doc's point.
@9 The coaches may not want to schedule Boise, but they've been fair about not knocking Boise for a weak schedule in their ballots. The computers can't do that, so the case for playoffs trumping conferences is getting stronger.
@11 If BSU joins the Mountain West for 2011 the 4 year formula might give the Big East's autobid to the Mountain West. ESPN/ABC has the Big East and WAC contracts so no wonder they're trying to find a big BCS game for BSU for 2011.
Doc's question is dead on. Will a third undefeated year and a third serious bowl opponent (Sooners+1, TCU -1) make any difference in scheduling? When the coaches #5 has to beg for a single big game for 2011, it's time to turn up the heat.
When I look at the coaches and media polls I think the non-AQ have a lot of earned media to run with. The last 4 positions should be reserved for any non BCS teams in the top 10. Can't reserve 6 spots for autobid and expect your conference losers to ever get in ahead of a top 10 non-AQ or independent.
Report Abuse
Oh, wait didn't the ACC do that already?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Boise State really can't control what conference they're in (after all you can only join a new conference if the new conference wants to expand) and the whole concept or conference strength is silly. It's practically impossible to say that one conference is better than another.
Earlier points:
- Boise can't join the PAC-10 because they're content on being a 10-team conference. besides Boise's not a research university, like the conference's other schools
- Joining the Mountain West wouldn't solve anything. Remember, they're a "mid-major" conference too, and besides if they hadn't produced Utah and BYU last year, most people would regard the conference on the same level as the WAC, with TCU playing the role of Boise.
Report Abuse
as far as the tcu bowl last year. it was the most competitive bowl on tv. 1 team has to lose. they lost by 1 point. either of those teams could have competed against any of the top 10 teams last year.
Report Abuse
boise state and the others like boise state will not have to knock on the doors of the pac 10 or of any other conference.
nor does the mountain west have to get invloved in a time consuming anti trust litigation against the bcs and the power 6 conferences.
senator hatch does not have to wait for obama to hold hearings on the bcs.
civil rico lawsuits are much quicker and much more deadly . the bcs and the conferences and the ncaa, in thousands of individual dishonest acts of hubris at levels which have rarely been equalled in history, have already dug their own economic graves.
we are just taking the evidence provided by the bcs, the conferences, and the ncaa and present the evidence, which is in the form of admission of dishonest activities. to honest judges and juries all over the us.
we sure do thank the boise states, the utahs, the tcus, the byus, and senator hatch for helping to bring the evidence to the surface.
however, more than any other organization, we thank certain courageous sportswriters at yahoo sports, including dr. saturday and those who refused to back down on the reggie bush investigation(but not including usc shill dienhart, a recent pete carroll plant at yahoo sports). for providing us with more leads and information than any other media organization covering college frootball and college sports.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 116