Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:58 am EST
This is the real prize, don't ya know ...

Now in its fourth year, the Blog Poll is a weekly effort of dozens of college football-centric Web sites representing a wide array of schools under the oversight of founder/manager/guru Brian Cook at MGoBlog, and now appears on CBS Sportsline. It’s an effort to provide a more rigorous check on the mainstream polls that actually, like, count toward the mythical championship, and enthusiastically shines a light on its voters' biases. But mainly, it’s fun.
If there is one position I am absolutely certain about at the end of this chaotic year, it's Florida at No. 1. The Gators defeated 10 bowl teams (second-best was Oklahoma with seven), faced the second-toughest schedule in the nation based on opponents' collective winning percentage and won by the highest average margin of victory. Eleven of their 13 wins were by 23 points or more, with only one rock-bottom embarrassment on the schedule (The Citadel, which UF trounced by 51) and four wins over teams that finished in my top 15, twice as many as anyone else except Southern Cal, which beat three top-15 outfits. Florida beat two top five teams, Oklahoma and Alabama, by double digits. As I said on Friday, a missed extra point against Ole Miss -- which subsequently won nine and finished in everyone's top 15 its own self -- isn't nearly enough to bring a resumé that strong to earth. The Gators are No. 1, and for all of the (legitimate) talk of a split title, it's not close.
As for the teams that were snubbed from the mythical championship process, I throw my hands up. I don't see any foolproof way to distinguish between USC, Texas and Utah, and almost resent having to do it. For the record: All four teams deserved a chance at the title, and should be read as 2a, 2b and 2c here rather than two, three and four.
But the entry form doesn't give voters that option, so I came to that order -- USC, Texas, Utah -- the way I've tended to break ties all year: Who has the best wins? Texas arguably has the single best win, over Oklahoma, and Utah has a pair of strong wins over Alabama and TCU. But neither can quite match the three unadulterated blowouts the Trojans put on the best teams on their schedule. Considering the lopsided scores, USC had the best pair of wins (Penn State and Ohio State), the best trio of wins (PSU, OSU and Oregon), the best quartet of wins (PSU, OSU, Oregon, Cal) and so on, all the way down the schedule until you get to the Washington teams. The Huskies and Cougars are absolute death according to two of the indicators I use in the abstract, strength of schedule and opponents' combined winning percentage, but USC also beat them 125-0, so I decided not to let them diminish the Trojans' excellence at the top. Again, this can go any way you want it to:

I reiterate that the most underrated team by far in the final mainstream polls was Texas Tech, which was hit with a much more severe punishment than Alabama and Penn State for getting waxed in the bowl game, despite identical 11-2 records and virtually identical season arcs (strong start, tough late loss to ruin a perfect season, sour finish in the bowl). The Raiders' win over Texas remains about as impressive as any single victory anyone collected all season, and Oklahoma State, Nebraska and Kansas aren't bad heads to have on your wall, either -- especially compared to Ohio State and Georgia, which for some reason leapt Tech in the AP and Coaches polls for ... I dunno, beating Michigan State? Only losing to Texas by three? I'm not sure what's going on with Tech in those polls, but late fade aside, the Raiders had a legitimate top-10 season in my opinion. Even if you heavily weigh your order to the end of the season (which I do not) you certainly can't separate them from Alabama and Penn State; other than maybe TCU, I don't know who has any claim to move in front of that trio, which looks about the same to me.
I spent most of November arguing against the sanctity of head-to-head, but it is useful here among very closely-ordered teams with no real separation on one another: Boise State is one ahead of Oregon because Boise beat Oregon; Florida State is one ahead of Virginia Tech because FSU beat Virginia Tech; the Hokies are one ahead of Cincinnati because they beat Cincy; Oregon State is one ahead of Pittsburgh because OSU beat Pitt; Cal is one ahead of Michigan State (a revision from my draft ballot) because Cal beat MSU; the Spartans are one ahead of Iowa because they beat Iowa, somehow. You've got the West Virginia-North Carolina-Boston College-Wake Forest win chain going in the 'Waiting' section, too. That's about as much discussion as those teams deserve.
Per Pollmaster Brian's instructions, next year's Blog Poll is cancelled: Spots 1 through 24 will be occupied by Tim Tebow, and Duke will be No. 25 throughout the season. Thanks for reading and for suggestions all year, and especially for accepting the idea that East Carolina can be No. 1, at least temporarily.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
40 Comments
1 - 25 of 40
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I realize iIshould've spoken up after the draft ballot, and it's all hair-splitting after those first nine teams, but Georgia in particular looks way overvalued here to me.
Report Abuse
Ole Miss is in everyone's top 15. That qualifies as above average.
Report Abuse
SWEET!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I really disagree with this one, mostly because getting blown out by a borderline top-25 team going in (Mississippi) is much, much worse than getting blown out by a borderline top-5 team going in (USC or Utah). Having said that, I think Alabama has been overrated since they beat Georgia, and were what I thought they were -- the SEC version of 2007 Kansas (great on one side of the ball, okay on the other, and took advantage of a favorable schedule and a down year for their division to run to the top of the polls).
Report Abuse
Florida got beat by an average Ole Miss team and you don't think Utah could beat Florida?
First of all, that "average" Ole Miss team's four losses were by a COMBINED 19 points with each one a touchdown or less. And they beat UF by a blocked extra point. Although we need a playoff (so that we don't have to debate endlessly about who should be #1), the selection of the teams for the bowls was done PRIOR to the Alabama-Utah game and at that point, Utah had played a VERY weak schedule and was unproven. Meanwhile, to quote from the Doc above: The Gators defeated TEN BOWL TEAMS (second-best was Oklahoma with seven), faced the SECOND-TOUGHEST SCHEDULE in the nation based on opponents' collective winning percentage and won by the HIGHEST MARGIN OF VICTORY...and four wins over teams that finished in my top 15, twice as many as anyone else except Southern Cal, which beat three top-15 outfits. Florida beat TWO TOP FIVE teams, Oklahoma and Alabama, by double digits." UF played a MUCH stronger schedule than Utah. To say that Utah would beat UF b/c UF lost to Ole Miss is asinine. And before you say "well, we beat Alabama by more points than UF did"....First of all, you only won by 3 points more (scored on a late field goal with 2:49 left in the game), otherwise it would be the SAME MOV. Second, when UF played Bama, Percy Harvin and TWO key offensive linemen and TWO key defensive linemen were injured (about 1/4 of the 22 starters including our star receiver/running back) and when Utah played Bama, Bama was without Andre Smith (player of the year) and his backup was injured in the 1st Qtr against Utah. Not to mention the fact that when UF/Bama played, everything was on the line...the winner would go to the MNC and the loser would get NOTHING!!!! In the game against Utah, Bama had NOTHING to play for except pride.....they had NO SHOT at even a split of the title even if they blew Utah to smithereens. Watch the UF/Bama game and see how hard Bama played and then watch the Utah game....Bama wasn't really there. If you had been playing Bama for the chance to go the MNC (and maybe if they had Andre Smith), Bama would have beaten Utah....but that did not happen. However, with the exception of the win over Alabama (which was not played prior to the selection of the teams for the MNC game) who was Utah's biggest win...TCU???, Oregon State??? by 3 in each game...and New Mexico???? PLEASE....I'm going to bust a gut laughing. Florida played TEN bowl teams (prior to bowl selection) 6 of whom won their bowl games...whereas Utah played ONLY FIVE (Air Force who lost to Houston, Oregon State who barely beat Pitt 3-0 in their bowl game, Colorado State, TCU, and BYU who lost to Arizona). Utah had a great year...but they did NOT have a strong schedule. And if going undefeated is the sole criteria for being the NCs, then why wasn't Auburn the NCs (or at least a split) in 2004...they were undefeated (as were USC and OK), but were left out of the NC game. They didn't get a split title either and they were undefeated.
Report Abuse
Might have something to do with the numbers in the loss column. Or maybe South Carolina belongs over Ole Miss? Can I get a holla for Wake Forest as national champs?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Really, what made a mess of things was that the title game was in the Orange Bowl.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
and did you seriously put texas tech at #7? not after the cotton bowl performance, you don't.
Report Abuse
UTAH? Brigham Young, TCU, and Alabama (without offensive lineman consensus All-American Andre Smith)
USC? They beat OSU (without Chris Wells), they beat California (beat Miami without Robert Marve), the beat Penn State (who beat Oregon State which USC lost to, barely got by OSU which almost lost to Ohio University)
Texas? Bare got by OSU, lost to Texas Tech.
The BCS should give consideration for wins over top 25 teams each weak as they used to do with a +/- scale. Who you matters. Florida proved that.
The Gators rule? All the rest can cry like little girls.
Report Abuse
Despite Rivals pick of the USC's QB af its pick as the best one in the bowls, Tebow is the best ever and still is....
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
As for Florida-what is the old saying-"Offense sells tickets-but Defense wins Championships". The offense gets all the hype-Tebow, Bradford, USC,Utes,Texas,Texas Tech-but the bottom line is-the top point scoring team-Oklahoma could only put up 14 points against Florida-including a 1st and goal-couldn't put it over the line in 4 attempts-in the SEC-we play Defense-look at the bowl records-SEC is number one.
Report Abuse
pretty bold claim for a guy who will never take a snap in the nfl (unless miami drafts him for the wildcat). nice qb in the florida system, nice guy...probably should have been a tight end.
1 - 25 of 40