Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

Most of the big recruiting powers are well into their 2010 classes: Texas made headlines with its unprecedented early efforts in February, but elsewhere, Alabama has verbal commits from six players, Florida from eight, LSU from six, Michigan from seven, Oklahoma from six, etc. In the Pac-10, even Washington is off to a fast start under Steve Sarkisian with six commits for next year. That's twice as many as the real Western behemoth, Southern Cal, and the L.A. Daily News' Scott Wolf has a good idea why:

After last year, Pete Carroll felt like schools negatively recruited against USC for a year to kids who committed early. So if there are commitments, some might remain silent for awhile. A few will go public, but others will be under the radar because USC does not want 10-12 kids out there committed.

This isn't exactly paranoid: Carroll lost three longstanding commitments on or around signing day in Vontaze Burfict (Arizona State), Randall Carroll (UCLA) and Morrell Presley (UCLA), and watched uncommitted but widely presumed Trojans Manti Te'o (Notre Dame) and Xavier Su'a Filo (UCLA) opt for rivals instead. UCLA, in particular, was more competitive (especially in greater L.A.) than it's been in years. So while almost everything else about SC's program -- practices included -- remains unusually open, the really important business is going a little hush-hush.

I think Florida State took a similar route during the Noles' heyday in the late nineties, when they'd routinely pick up a handful of five-stars to rocket a "disappointing" class to the top of the rankings on signing day. It wouldn't cross anyone else's mind because a) So few teams are in a position to rack up many early commitments, and b) So few of those commitments are actually worth poaching. It takes a Mack truck of a program like USC, Texas or Florida to be worried enough about its precious recruits to feel the need to keep them close to the vest, and to be patient and self-assured enough to make that policy work. In Texas' case, the instate competition is so far behind the Longhorns' curve that their exclusively Lonestar crop is practically locked in. If Wolf is right, though, obviously USC is beginning to feel a little heat.

digg delicious
more

268 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. bigboo's bro
    1. Posted by bigboo's bro Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Some of those five-stars may also be wondering about: when the NCAA will come down on Bush-gate; the coaching staff's inability to maintain intensity, resulting in no BCS championship games; the coaching staff's inability to develop a feature running back despite great talent; Carroll's preoccupation with celebrity twittering instead of coaching; etc.
  2. The Haze!
    2. Posted by The Haze! Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Thats just Pete being Pete...
  3. Joe
    3. Posted by Joe Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    USC will do fine. They'll pull a couple of five stars out of nowhere.
  4. Jonas J
    4. Posted by Jonas J Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    2nd
    i don't completely understand this...does this mean that Pete Carroll isn't saying who he's recruiting so other colleges can't try to steal them at the last minute?
  5. dns y
    5. Posted by dns y Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:45 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    who cares it is only college football
  6. Brian C
    6. Posted by Brian C Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    When will all the blue chips that go to USC realize that they are competing against other blue chips for starting positions..If the were to go somewhere else they would be automatic starters... Wake up go somewhere other than USC.. Start.. and go to the pros..
  7. Chrispy
    7. Posted by Chrispy Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i think i'm pretty early on this list. GO DUCKS!!!!!!!!!
  8. fly eagles fly
    8. Posted by fly eagles fly Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    wouldn't ucla and others be able to use this information even more to their advantage? before the recruits were scared off by the crowd in line for their position - now other programs can scare the recruits with the perception of a crowd whether there is one or not.
  9. Baller
    9. Posted by Baller Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Pete Carroll is the man at USC. They'll let him do whatever he wants
  10. hell-is-hot
    10. Posted by hell-is-hot Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    8=
  11. goodcallmiller
    11. Posted by goodcallmiller Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    wow
  12. daniel h
    12. Posted by daniel h Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    word
  13. Ravi A
    13. Posted by Ravi A Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i dont like ucla
  14. Tim R
    14. Posted by Tim R Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    A blog's comments based on wolfie? hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  15. Adam
    15. Posted by Adam Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The only thing stupider than post number 5 announcing "second" is post number 6 announcing "second."
    Get a life. For real.
  16. KE
    16. Posted by KE Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Don't be bitter about strategic planning...FIGHT ON USC!
  17. ajax_afc
    17. Posted by ajax_afc Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    why do you idiots post "first" or "second" - who gives a crap?
  18. MeganM
    18. Posted by MeganM Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Jonas - that's exactly what he's saying.
    http://meganrebekahblogs.blogspot.com
  19. Reese
    19. Posted by Reese Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    OU gets a bunch of recruits out of Texas, some of the best in fact. But unlike OU, we (UT) actually can get players that are winners and not just athletes.
    None the less, they are not practically "locked-in" to Texas. Get your facts straight hinton
  20. James
    20. Posted by James Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Boo Hoo, who cares, I hope USC goes down, sick of the trojans, GO HUSKERS!!!!
  21. Tim
    21. Posted by Tim Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:02 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bigboo, you sound like the typical SC hater. No biggie. As far as Burfict goes, there was already a ton of speculation weeks before signing day that he would not qualify to get into USC academically. There was also a lot of talk about PC not allowing players to go on their Mormon missions. Whether or not that's true, this is recruiting and ALL coaches will say what they must to get their guy. Unfortunate, but true.
  22. SCott Partridge
    22. Posted by SCott Partridge Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Even though some blue-chip players decide on going to other schools, that doesn't mean that USC will not be in competition to win the Pac-10 and the National Championship every year. They will always get great recruits in a relatively weak conference and Pete Carroll is one of the best if not the best coach in college football.

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers