Sun Nov 16, 2008 7:06 pm EST
In a perfect world, the Doc would be given carte blanche to publicly torch the Bowl Championship Series in effigy and institute the elaborate, double-elimination battle royale of his dreams. But we live in the world we live in, so each Sunday the Doc looks at what the new BCS numbers mean for the rest of the season. Rooting interest: chaos. Always chaos.
At one point Saturday night, a paradigm-shifting stunner looked possible, if not exactly probable. Simultaneously, for a few minutes, Mississippi State led Alabama in the second quarter while Stanford was knotted with USC at the half, with Troy running roughshod over LSU for good measure (losing the Tigers as a viable strength of schedule card would be a hit to Florida and/or Alabama, although maybe not a significant one; every tenth of a point here is crucial). But no alarms in the end, no surprises: All the favorites held on, and the top nine this week is identical to last week. The only change in the top-10 is in the final spot, where Ohio State leapfrogs Georgia (insert OMG Big Ten over SEC! lament here, and blather yourself into a stupor trying to justify it).
I maintain, along with everyone else, that the mythical championship game is inevitably a collision between someone from the Big 12 South -- not necessarily the champion, if that champ should happen to fall to overlooked Missouri in the Big 12 Championship -- and the winner of the Florida-Alabama showdown in the SEC. As I said earlier this week, though, I don't think that team can be Texas under any realistic scenario. Too many chips have to fall exactly the Longhorns' way, and the voters/computers still have to buy them over strong competing arguments, as we'll see below.
Sitting pretty. Three teams are in "just win" mode: Texas Tech, which can still finish 13-0, and Florida and Alabama, which obviously need only to win their respective rivalry games (yes, I'm taking a Gator victory over The Citadel this week for granted) to set up a winner-take-all "semi-final" in the SEC Championship.
The fourth team I'd throw into that mix is Oklahoma, with this week's hyped visit from Texas Tech serving as the other "semifinal" game. The Sooners remain behind Texas for now -- as they should, given the head-to-head result in October -- but a win over the streaking Raiders Saturday would likely vault OU ahead of the Longhorns with another tough game, at Oklahoma State, to solidify that lead. Since both Oklahoma and Texas' routes to the Big 12 Championship hinge on a Tech loss to OU and a subsequent showdown in the BCS standings, the Sooners' pending advantage there -- that is, if they beat Tech and OSU -- puts them in the driver's seat.
A little help? Texas is in a bizarre situation in that its route to the Big 12 Championship is virtually impossible -- no matter what happens in Norman this weekend, the Horns' winning the South essentially requires a Baylor upset over Texas Tech in two weeks -- and its path to the national championship depends on both Oklahoma and Texas Tech losing down the stretch, one of them in the Big 12 Championship. As I see it, the only way Texas finishes in the top two in the final BCS is this:
• Oklahoma beats Texas Tech (Creates three-way tie between UT, OU and Tech)
• Oklahoma State beats Oklahoma (Eliminates Oklahoma; creates two-way tie between UT and Tech, which Tech wins on head-to-head tiebreaker)
• Baylor beats Texas Tech, sending UT to the Big 12 Championship (please), OR
• Missouri beats Texas Tech in the Big 12 Championship (Texas advances to No. 2 by attrition)
If Oklahoma goes on to the Big 12 Championship and loses, leaving voters to decide between one-loss Texas and one-loss Texas Tech, they're likely to remember this:
... and vote for Texas Tech. If Texas Tech beats Oklahoma, goes on to the Big 12 Championship and loses, they're likely to remember that win, throw up their hands and vote for USC.
Basically, Texas cannot win unless it's in precisely the bullet-pointed sequence laid out above, which leaves Oklahoma and Texas Tech with two losses apiece. Though that's still better than USC's chances, especially if Oregon State keeps winning and the Trojans can't even play the "conference champion" card.
For chaos' sake. Other than crossing your fingers for long-shot upsets by Florida State, Auburn or Baylor, any scenario under which Missouri wins the Big 12 championship throws the whole system into disarray. No matter the exact permutations -- whether the Tigers beat Oklahoma or Texas Tech -- voters would be left to decide between a pair of one-loss teams (Texas and Texas Tech), neither of which won its conference championship, and USC, which has a weaker schedule and might not win its conference championship, either, depending on what happens to Oregon State. I mean, does Penn State creep back into that picture? Or, heaven forbid, computer fave Utah? There is no fair way to resolve that scenario.
So whatever happens over the next two weeks, remember: There's always Chase Daniel, maker of mischief, waiting on Dec. 6 to burn this whole thing to the ground.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
98 Comments
1 - 25 of 98
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And as an SEC-hater that is still bitter about Florida hopping Michigan in 2006 (albeit apparently the correct judgment) there is no way in hell the general public will let the (this year) mediocre SEC in with a rematch.
Report Abuse
It's getting to the point where ESPN is more of an SEC homer network than CBS.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
It would indeed be a sad statement on the state of college football that we could have two undefeated teams who were never given a chance to test their mettle on the field for a championship and were deliberately bypassed by a team that lost without ever being permitted to have a chance against them.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Why are you so sure OU will win the 3-way tiebreaker? Obviously they stand a very good chance thanks to having two big games against ranked teams that will be fresh in the voters minds. But that is what it is going to come down, what the voters think. And if they truly look objectively don't you think Texas should have a better shot than to be written off?
Record of OU's non-conference opponents: 18-24
Record of Texas' non-conference opponents: 21-19
Big 12 non-common opponents:
(Texas) - 14-8
Missouri: 9-2
Colorado: 5-6
(OU) - 11-11
Nebraska: 7-4
KSU: 4-7
Head to head result at a neutral site:
Texas 45 - OU 35
Loss:
Texas: 33-39 at Tech
OU: 35-45 at neutral site
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1)florida loses at florida st., but beats an overrated bama team in the sec championship but has 2 losses.
2)texas tech loses to oklahoma, who advances to the big xii championship game where missouri avenges last year, meaning a 2 loss team has won the big xii.
3)oregon st. wins the remainder of its games, thereby winning the pac-10 with 3 losses.
4)somehow, some way, michigan st. beats penn st., thereby throwing the big ten to ohio st., and leaving the big ten champ with 2 losses.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I should also remind you that in their only BCS appearance the Utes abused Big East champion Pitt.
Report Abuse
If this is the case, how are you going to put UT in front of TT since they just got beat 2 weeks ago.
I guess this only applys if your a cry baby.
Report Abuse
Texas Tech loses to Oklahoma
Texas Tech loses to Baylor
If Oklahoma beats Okie State, Texas and Oklahoma, tied by record, the head to head goes to Texas, otherwise it's all Texas anyway
Texas beats Missouri in the championship game
As the computers already love Texas, and the pollsters have them at number 4, behind two teams who'd drop by this point (Tech and the loser of Bama/Florida), BAM. They're in number two, and it only requires one other team to lose (Granted, it requires them to lose TWICE...)
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
against OSU than they do this wkend.
Matt is correct about potential problems awaiting whoever at Arrowhead. Like a home game for Mizzou,
probably about 10 degrees and boisterous.
Report Abuse
All Texas would need then would be for Oklahoma to lose to OKST or Missouri in the championship game - something that OKST and Chase Daniel and crew may very well be able to pull off considering OK's defensive shortcomings. A Tech loss to a 2-loss OK team wouldn't help them in the computers either.
Of course, with all that said, Texas Tech will likely run the table. At that point, Texas's only hope is that Florida St. sneaks up on Florida (unlikely) and then Florida undresses Alabama (likely). Then we can watch an all-Big 12 BCS championship game - a rematch between Tech and Texas :-).
Report Abuse
liz-- I don't think two schools from the same conference can play in BCS championship game.
Report Abuse
-Texas: Another team without a conference championship and 1 loss, who played a tougher schedule and looked more impressive doing it, with their loss coming to a top 5 team on the road as opposed to at a neutral site like Alabama's loss would be.
-Texas Tech: Provided they lose to Oklahoma, ditto as the above.
-USC: A team with a share of the Pac 10 title or the outright Pac 10 title that everyone knows is probably the most talented team in the country.
Then you wonder why people in other parts of the country make fun of SEC fans for their stupidity.
1 - 25 of 98