Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:19 pm EST
There's no denying the status quo: If they win out, undefeated Texas will play the winner of the Alabama/Florida SEC Championship for the BCS Championship. If there's attrition among the the "Big Three," though, the palace is open to a horde of barbarian contenders whose path to Pasadena isn't nearly as clear-cut. This series examines their prospects. Today: Cincinnati.
Assumptions: The Bearcats have no chance at the title game -- absolutely none whatsoever -- unless they finish 12-0, and they still face the two toughest games of their season, at home against West Virginia on Nov. 13 and at Pittsburgh for a possible winner-take-all game on the first Saturday in December. Cincy also has to deal with UConn, which dealt the Bearcats their only conference loss en route to the Big East title last year, and Illinois, which set itself up as a pending turnaround story with its first decent effort of the season in last Saturday's win over Michigan.
Virtues: Cincy is as statistically dominant across the board as any team in the country: The offense is in the top 10 nationally and leads the Big East in passing yards, total yards and scoring, and leads the nation in pass efficiency; the defense leads the nation in tackles for loss and is second in sacks. The Bearcats have yet to finish with a negative turnover margin, have returned both a punt and a kickoff for touchdowns and haven't missed a beat with Zach Collaros in place of starting quarterback Tony Pike for the last two-and-a-half games. They're good at almost everything, and not bad at anything, as their margin of victory proves -- at 28.2 points per game, the Bearcats have wailed harder on their schedule to date than any other team except Texas (it's a tie).
Obviously, it's not the toughest road to nirvana. But if they run the table, the 'Cats will have about as good an overall set of road wins -- at Rutgers, at Oregon State and at South Florida already in the bag, none of them very close in the end, and at Pittsburgh still to come -- as any team this side of USC (at Ohio State, at Cal, at Notre Dame), and the Trojans are no longer in the discussion.
Disqualifier(s): Still, the lack of a really big fish above the mantel is a killer in the human polls, which are already inclined to turn up their noses at the Big East, and the overall schedule doesn't rank among the top 50 in any of the four computer polls that list strength of schedule numbers. It's not an awful schedule -- the only genuinely rotten games are against I-AA Southeast Missouri State and rebuilding MAC pushover Miami (Ohio), a traditional rival -- but of course there will be the requisite bloc of voters who scoff, "Cincinnati, humbug!" no matter what the numbers say on any stat sheet or computer printout, and it will be hard for Bearcat backers to persuade them by arguing, "But they beat Oregon State and Pittsburgh!"
Best-case scenario: The remaining schedule is tough enough to prevent the Bearcats from dropping significantly in any of the polls, and neither TCU nor Boise State has the juice on their remaining slates to overtake the Bearcats if they keep winning at their current pace; Cincinnati is not likely to fall without a loss or miraculous escape, and even a miraculous escape might be acceptable if it comes against West Virginia or Pitt. That leaves only two obstacles to the top: A loss by Iowa (the Hawkeyes still have to play at Ohio State) and two losses among the Florida-Alabama-Texas troika, which would leave the Bearcats ranked No. 2 among undefeated teams.
The question is whether that would be good enough to rise to No. 2 overall above a one-loss Florida or Alabama, or, from the back of the pack, one-loss Oregon, the one team currently sitting behind the Bearcats with the profile and potential to make a serious run down the stretch if the Ducks keep up the scorched-earth act of the last month. The other possible interloper: LSU. If the Tigers upset Alabama Saturday and run the table through an SEC Championship upset over Florida, they'll almost certainly jump the Bearcats. Otherwise, though, if Texas and Iowa lose somewhere along the way, it's much harder to see the loser of the SEC title game remaining in one of the top two spots if Cincy dispatches a quality Pitt outfit on the same day.
Level of fantasy: Finalist on American Idol. No one thought they had a chance at the start of this thing, when the Bearcats were just one face among many, but now that they're here, there's a fighting chance: As the BCS lines up in the moment, Cincinnati is third in line for the No. 2 spot behind Texas and Iowa, and the only team with a realistic chance of skipping UC in the line is LSU. If they keep winning, not many dominoes have to fall to move the 'Cats into at least a 50/50 argument for the second championship slot.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
56 Comments
1 - 24 of 56
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Are you serious?
this would make no sense whatsoever if a one loss Oregon (a head to head loss to Boise St.) CANNOT pass Boise St. if Boise St. Doesn't lose. If they do it just reinforces everything that's wrong with the system and shows how bad we NEED a playoff.
Report Abuse
They* CANNOT
Report Abuse
I wholeheartedly disagree with Matt's assessment that Cincy would have better road wins than Iowa if they win out. Beating three non-top 25 teams on the road is somehow better than beating three top-25 teams on the road (Ohio State, Penn State and Wisconsin, plus Michigan State and Iowa State for good measure)?
Really, I don't care much about Iowa making it to the title game or not...I can understand some people voting on Iowa's close games, and frankly, I'd rather go to the Rose Bowl and watch the parade anyway, but the really bad arguments made to justify other teams going ahead of them are pretty annoying
Report Abuse
-While it's rarely a good idea, sometimes you have to throw out on field results. It's because things called "upsets" happen in sports. Outside of East Lansing and Columbus, no one thought App State was actually a better team than Michigan two years ago. Clearly USC was a better team than Stanford that same year. It's like the 1980 USA hockey team... Russia probably would have won 7-9 of 10. In this case, with one exception, Oregon has been the more impressive team. In all likelihood, Oregon would win 6-8 of 10 against Boise. And it would be absolutely asinine to reward Boise's joke of a schedule with Oregon being their only quality win with a trip to the championship game. While it will likely be a moot point, given the number of teams with a better claim to a championship berth than 1-loss Oregon (0 or 1-loss Bama, Florida, Texas, Iowa, PSU and maybe LSU), they are still more deserving of a berth than Boise State.
Report Abuse
Second, everyone else in the Big East stinks. If not for ESPN pimping the Big East purely for commercial reasons (lots of viewers in NY, Florida, Ohio, Pittsburgh, etc), they would not even be a BCS conference. Boise State, BYU, Utah, or TCU would all rule this conference, perennially. In fact, it should be mandated that these teams join the Big East conference just to improve college football.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The problem is, people are afraid of the new era of college football. Teams like Cincy, Boise St are the future. Its about time that people start recognizing it.
Report Abuse
Iowa wins its last 3 games, goes 12-0. Florida loses to LSU, which beats Alabama, making them both 12-1 and Alabama 11-1. In the meantime, Texas loses the Big 12 title game, ending up 12-1, and Cincinnati, TCU and Boise State all run the table. Who do YOU think deserves to be in the title game?? With a playoff, it wouldn't matter now would it? They would actually get to decide the championship ON THE FIELD, where it is supposed to be decided. Not in the minds of poll voters and BCS calculations.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
You don't really know what would happen. So don't give me that crap about weak conferences, etc....
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
-Whoa... you're trying to compare the Big 10 to the Big East? Are you freaking kidding me? The Big 10 is probably the 2nd best conference in the country right now. Iowa and PSU could both win the ACC, Big 12, Big East or Pac 10 and would have a fighting chance in the SEC. The only Big 12 and Pac 10 teams that could win the Big 10 this year are Texas and Oregon. No one from the ACC or Big East could. And I'd take OSU and Wisconsin over any other conference's 3 & 4 teams.
Just because the Big 10 doesn't do well when playing up (our 4 v. their 2, our 5 v. their 3 etc) in bowl games that are essentially on the road, doesn't mean we're a bad conference.
Report Abuse
1) Reorganize into 8 leagues of 10 teams each (snag some of the better non-big 6 teams to fill out the 80 teams needed).
2) Each team plays 9 conference games (ie: full round robin play).
3) 3 non-confence games are with 3 teams from 3 different conferences (no div II powder puffs allowed). Ideally each conference would play a rougly equal number of teams from each conference. While not perfect, there would be enough inter conference games to get a real good idea of how strong each conference is.
4) The champion of each league would go to an 8 team playoff (include a tie breaker system for the confernce champ).
Any undefeated team would automatically get to the playoff. Since you play every team in your conference, you either win the conference or you have at least 1 loss. If you keep winning you can go all the way to the championship.
You can even keep the other bowls for the remaining teams.
Sounds great in theory. The problem:
Right now all you need is a 6-6 record to qualify for a bowl. Assuming we don't start sending teams with lossing records to bowls, gone are the days of sending the 7-8 teams to a bowl. Without the 3-4 powederpuff games to pump up the number of wins, you are probably looking at an average of 5 teams per league making a bowl. In a down year you may only get a couple bowl games. Some would argue that is good as there are too many bowls, but that means most leagues lose around 2-3 bowl games per year along with the money and exposure that they bring. It also makes the revenue much more variable. Occasionally a league can't fill all it's tie ins and loses a low level bowl that doesn't pay much. If you only get 2 bowls and your champion loses in the first round, you lose the income from a couple of big to moderate level bowls.
Given the fact that football and bowl games are cash cows for these universities and the confernces have revenue sharing on the bowls (ie: even the cellar dweller gets some money when the #8 team goes to the toilet bowl), why would they want a change the system.
Report Abuse
According to Jeff Sagarin, UF has the third toughest schedule amongst the top ten teams. Cincinnati and Boise St. have the easiest schedules (again, within those teams ranked in the top ten).
Report Abuse
I'm an SEC guy, and I'm all for a playoff. I'm hoping for chaos, it's our best chance.
1 - 24 of 56