Dr. Saturday - NCAAF

Another week, another political sideswipe at the BCS:

WASHINGTON — The incoming chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said Wednesday that he will hold hearings and possibly subpoena NCAA officials, college presidents, players, coaches and athletics directors in effort to force a playoff in the Football Bowl Subdivision.

"I think you really do not get a true No. 1 out of (the Bowl Championship Series)," Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., told USA TODAY. "Nobody questions the Super Bowl. The team that wins is the best team that year. I think we can do the same thing at the college level where once it's over there is no questions about who is No. 1 and who is No. 2."
[...]
"I really feel that you can't leave it as is," Towns said. "Right now, if you ask what the No. 1 team is, a lot of people would say USC. Others would say Texas and if you ask anybody in the state of Utah, they would say their team was the best. I want to get a system that has credibility."

That sounds nothing whatsoever like the "antitrust" strawman that's fueled no fewer than three separate acts of political grandstanding and at least one very earnest blog entry against the Series since Thanksgiving. Towns doesn't even bother with the Constitutional cover: He just wants to know who's No. 1, dammit.

The Oversight and Governmental Reform Committee is the same one that famously hauled in a bunch of washed up baseball players to talk about their hormone levels under threat of perjury, so it certainly knows how to grandstand for the Greater Good without actually accomplishing anything -- it is, after all, aimed at government reform, and "who is No. 1 and who is No. 2" therefore falls well outside of its purview. I guess Jim Delany can expect a subpoena any day now (actually, Representative, I'll swallow my libertarian pride and volunteer if you're looking for someone to serve that one).

As a trend, though, this is as disastrous for the BCS as it is for the concept of disciplined, limited government. Too many coaches, writers and now actual power brokers have jumped ship for this Titanic to remain afloat without some major repairs. Just more proof that it's only a matter of time before the thing ends up at the bottom of the ocean.

digg delicious
more

16 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. oldskoolisbest
    1. Posted by oldskoolisbest Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:44 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Nobody questions the Super Bowl. The team that wins is the best team that year." That's exactly correct. I mean, it was obvious all last season that the New York Giants were the best team in the land, even when they dropped 2 of 3 against the Cowboys and wound up with worse records than 3 other teams. They were the best team that year. And this year, it's obvious that both teams in the NFC have consistently outperformed their peers through the entire season. I would love an NFL style playoff in college football! ::Retches::
  2. travisf
    2. Posted by travisf Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    We need consolation placement rounds for the hundreds of teams that don't make it to the championship game.
    I want to know all their ranks from 1-343 as decided by a nine-round quadruple elimination tournament. Anything else is a travesty.
  3. Year2
    3. Posted by Year2 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:28 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    For me, the issue is pretty simple. Whether you use the BCS or a playoff, you're not guaranteed a satisfying champion.
    With that in mind, which will you choose? A system where you get to see the top teams in the country play a maximum of one more game or a minimum of one more game? I choose to back a system where the top eight teams play each other tournament-style because it means we get to see some of them play more than once.
    As a fan, that's all I want: more football games played between the best of the best. You can argue all you want about the relative merits of a champion produced by the BCS versus a playoff, but the BCS caps the number of games the best teams can play at one. An eight-team playoff caps it at three.
    3 1. QED.
  4. Year2
    4. Posted by Year2 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:28 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Should say 3 is greater than 1. Apparently the HTML filter takes out all angle brackets.
  5. Mike
    5. Posted by Mike Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Cripes. I care who is number one in football. You guys care who is number one in football.
    But I'd rather my elected officials make sure I don't get laid off this year!!!!
  6. Zachary K
    6. Posted by Zachary K Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Nobody questions the Super Bowl. The team that wins is the best team that year."
    Ew.
  7. Zachary K
    7. Posted by Zachary K Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    And what's with that picture? The guy in the background is enormous.
  8. Gbdup
    8. Posted by Gbdup Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    19 out of 30 nfl teams arent worth over a billion now that the markets have crashed. whatever they were valued at a year ago cut that by about 40%
  9. jimmy
    9. Posted by jimmy Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    playoff
    there is such a big space between the end of season and the 1st bowl
    so many ways to do it
  10. Rich
    10. Posted by Rich Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Limited government fail.
  11. swanson
    11. Posted by swanson Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    They do need some sort of playoff system that way when the SEC dominates like it has the last 3 years noone can complain. But in all seriousness there needs to be one because teams like Utah who plays a weak schedule and goes undefeated gets shafted because of their schedule and teams like USC who have a great team but slips up. Texas has no right to complain because if they wanted to play in the national championship all they had to do is win when it counted....Its the same concept in a playoff: win and play in the big one. Last year the Cowboys beat the Giants twice in the regular season....Who won the superbowl??? The giants!
  12. flyingcandyman
    12. Posted by flyingcandyman Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The only way a playoff would work is if those that get knocked off in the 2nd round ad onwards go to non-BCS bowls. Then when you have 8 teams left you take the teams with matching records (15-0s, 14-1s, etc. etc.) and match them heads-up, best records play for title. If you wind up with an odd number, they get matched with the next best team available and they go. Also, the winning teams get preferred rankings over the losers (so the winner of the #2 Bowl game trump the loser of the #1 game).
    I belive this method could produce an undisputed champion 9 times out of 10. BUT, if there winds up a tie for #1. Those teams can choose to share the title, or risk their championship in a "Pinks" game where the winner takes all.
  13. peabird15
    13. Posted by peabird15 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hey forget the BCS and Playoff....this dude is paid to make sure folks have jobs, the country's infrastructure is taken care of, to watch over his constituents, and the like....NOT worry himself about a college football champion....NOT TO MENTION THE STATE HE REPRESENTS HASN'T HAD EVEN A SNIFF OF A COLLEGE FOOTBALL CHAMP IN HOW LONG??????????????????
    Here's an idea HERO....get to work....on taking care of folks!!!!!
    This kind of stuff lets me know that we are in deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep sht!
  14. Kyle
    14. Posted by Kyle Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Firstly, if you really think Congress can only do one thing at one time, you're surely unaware of how large the federal government and the Hill truly is.
    Secondly, the BCS likely is an antitrust violation under the legal definition. While I'm not sure the legal status of the NCAA, I do know the professional sports leagues are exempted from this law specifically by legislation. If Congress is going to carve out these exemptions, damn straight they should make sure they are not abused.
    What always gets me is no one argues the protection should be taken away and the entities should be required to open themselves up to competition. They would just rather Congress get out of it and let the organizations go on making a fortune at the expense of others, with no consumer pressures. Why the ordinary American sides with these entities is utterly beyond me, and why the good Doctor continues to act as if Congress has no place in this issue (without really addressing whether or not they should) is also getting a bit old.
  15. bobby
    15. Posted by bobby Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    play off there are how many nfl teams and how many college teams do the math. it is time somebody speak against playoffs. first lets see who wants a playoff the teams that blow it during thier season and think they "deserve" another shot because blowing it was a "fluke" or the non bcs conf that want to play po dunk AK. say we have the best record and deserve the shot over the team that has played the hardest teams they could find. If utah thinks they are that good then why not join the pac 10 or another bcs conf and show us lol but do not pad the schedule then tell us they "Deserve" the championship and not to take anything away from utah beating alabama but that was one game not a season of tough games
  16. bobby
    16. Posted by bobby Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    oh and who in thier right mind would and congress deciding any thing. i pity the fool that belives congress could do better then the ncaa and the bcs have you seen what they have done with the economy so for lol

Dr. Saturday

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Matt Hinton

Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Dr. Saturday Recent Readers