Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:00 pm EST
Another week, another political sideswipe at the BCS:
WASHINGTON — The incoming chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said Wednesday that he will hold hearings and possibly subpoena NCAA officials, college presidents, players, coaches and athletics directors in effort to force a playoff in the Football Bowl Subdivision.
"I think you really do not get a true No. 1 out of (the Bowl Championship Series)," Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., told USA TODAY. "Nobody questions the Super Bowl. The team that wins is the best team that year. I think we can do the same thing at the college level where once it's over there is no questions about who is No. 1 and who is No. 2."
[...]
"I really feel that you can't leave it as is," Towns said. "Right now, if you ask what the No. 1 team is, a lot of people would say USC. Others would say Texas and if you ask anybody in the state of Utah, they would say their team was the best. I want to get a system that has credibility."
That sounds nothing whatsoever like the "antitrust" strawman that's fueled no fewer than three separate acts of political grandstanding and at least one very earnest blog entry against the Series since Thanksgiving. Towns doesn't even bother with the Constitutional cover: He just wants to know who's No. 1, dammit.
The Oversight and Governmental Reform Committee is the same one that famously hauled in a bunch of washed up baseball players to talk about their hormone levels under threat of perjury, so it certainly knows how to grandstand for the Greater Good without actually accomplishing anything -- it is, after all, aimed at government reform, and "who is No. 1 and who is No. 2" therefore falls well outside of its purview. I guess Jim Delany can expect a subpoena any day now (actually, Representative, I'll swallow my libertarian pride and volunteer if you're looking for someone to serve that one).
As a trend, though, this is as disastrous for the BCS as it is for the concept of disciplined, limited government. Too many coaches, writers and now actual power brokers have jumped ship for this Titanic to remain afloat without some major repairs. Just more proof that it's only a matter of time before the thing ends up at the bottom of the ocean.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
16 Comments
1 - 16 of 16
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I want to know all their ranks from 1-343 as decided by a nine-round quadruple elimination tournament. Anything else is a travesty.
Report Abuse
With that in mind, which will you choose? A system where you get to see the top teams in the country play a maximum of one more game or a minimum of one more game? I choose to back a system where the top eight teams play each other tournament-style because it means we get to see some of them play more than once.
As a fan, that's all I want: more football games played between the best of the best. You can argue all you want about the relative merits of a champion produced by the BCS versus a playoff, but the BCS caps the number of games the best teams can play at one. An eight-team playoff caps it at three.
3 1. QED.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
But I'd rather my elected officials make sure I don't get laid off this year!!!!
Report Abuse
Ew.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
there is such a big space between the end of season and the 1st bowl
so many ways to do it
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I belive this method could produce an undisputed champion 9 times out of 10. BUT, if there winds up a tie for #1. Those teams can choose to share the title, or risk their championship in a "Pinks" game where the winner takes all.
Report Abuse
Here's an idea HERO....get to work....on taking care of folks!!!!!
This kind of stuff lets me know that we are in deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep sht!
Report Abuse
Secondly, the BCS likely is an antitrust violation under the legal definition. While I'm not sure the legal status of the NCAA, I do know the professional sports leagues are exempted from this law specifically by legislation. If Congress is going to carve out these exemptions, damn straight they should make sure they are not abused.
What always gets me is no one argues the protection should be taken away and the entities should be required to open themselves up to competition. They would just rather Congress get out of it and let the organizations go on making a fortune at the expense of others, with no consumer pressures. Why the ordinary American sides with these entities is utterly beyond me, and why the good Doctor continues to act as if Congress has no place in this issue (without really addressing whether or not they should) is also getting a bit old.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 16 of 16