Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:02 pm EST
The most interesting aspect of the Heisman Trophy is always the players it excludes as a matter of course. With the field of favorites rapidly narrowing down the stretch, Alternate Heisman Reality looks at some of the more deserving candidates off the beaten path. Today: Georgia Tech quarterback Josh Nesbitt.
Generic Profile. Junior quarterback for a one-loss, top-10 team possibly headed for a conference championship and automatic BCS bid, and trigger man of the highest-gaining and highest-scoring offense in the ACC.
By the Numbers. Time for the blind taste test -- who you got?

"Quarterback A," as you might have guessed, is media darling and omnipresent Heisman frontrunner Tim Tebow, who has the benefit of being more accurate than "Quarterback B," Nesbitt, but can't hope to match Nesbitt's penchant for big plays. In fact, no quarterback can: In Georgia Tech's overwhelmingly run-based attack -- also expertly navigated by Nesbitt on his way to a likely 1,000-yard season on the ground -- defenses are so stunned when he actually steps back to throw that almost every completion ends as a big play. More than three-fourths of Nesbitt's completions (45 of 58) have gone for first downs, slightly over half have covered at least 15 yards and almost a third have gained at least 25 yards, with a handful of 60-plus-yard bombs in that number. When Mississippi State overplayed the option in early October, Nesbitt burned the Bulldogs for 266 yards and touchdown on 11-of-14 passing.
The problem for a quarterback working in such a run-based offense is that the passing stats don't follow -- Nesbitt doesn't have enough attempts to qualify for most stat categories. But if he did, he'd easily lead the nation in yards per attempt and yards per completion and rank in the top 10 in pass efficiency, on top of being the No. 5 rusher among quarterbacks.
Intangibles Ho! The quarterback does yeoman's work in the triple option, essentially doubling as a fullback by slogging out four yards per carry and consistently converting short-yardage situations while drawing hits that serve as "blocks" on many of his option pitches when plays go outside. Because this system relies so heavily on post-snap reads, Nesbitt makes the critical split-second decision that determines the success or failure of almost every play, even in the running game, and it's not for nothing that the Jackets scored at least 24 points in every ACC game and finished as far and away the most prolific overall attack in the league.
Note, too, that Nesbitt led two long field goal drives in the fourth quarter to bring the Jackets from behind to beat eventual Atlantic Division champ Clemson, and slammed the door on Virginia Tech by immediately answering two Hokie touchdown drives in the second half, sealing up the Jackets' biggest win of the year with a 40-yard touchdown run with three minutes to play. At Florida State, he accounted for 271 total yards and four touchdowns and at one point stripped an FSU defender of a teammate's fumble to maintain possession, then ran in a crucial touchdown a few plays later in a 49-44 marathon of a win. If you want a "tough" quarterback, Nesbitt is at the top of that list.
Three Strikes. Nesbitt a) Doesn't play for a high profile program known for offensive superstars (Georgia Tech has never produced a Heisman winner); b) Doesn't put up big passing numbers; and c) Hasn't established a high individual profile.
Face it: For all his big plays downfield, the guy only completes 46 percent of his passes, and it would probably be worse if not for the sure-handed acrobatics of his lone reliable target, Demaryius Thomas. Nesbitt was 1-of-7 through the air with an interception in his team's biggest game of the year, against Virginia Tech (though that lone completion covered 51 yards), and combined to hit a dismal 9-of-29 in back-to-back Thursday night showcases against Clemson and Miami. Nesbitt runs his offense as well as any other quarterback in the country at the moment, but who wants to vote for one of the least accurate passers in the country?
Might Enter the Real Discussion If ... He goes 11-for-12 passing for 280 yards and four touchdowns while rushing for 150 yards in a nationally-televised, 56-7 rout over Georgia, then lights up Clemson in similar fashion to take the ACC Championship. It would help a lot if Texas also lost and a few talking heads started floating the Jackets as potential BCS championship busters. Unless Nesbitt is clearly the hottest player in the country, pulling the strings of the hottest team at the end of the year, his name won't come up.
But he's still at least as strong a candidate as Eric Crouch ever was.
Dr. Saturday is a college football blog edited by Matt Hinton. Email him tips and feedback.

Posted Feb 3 2010
RivalsMinute: Bama wins the title
Posted Feb 3 2010
Posted Feb 3 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
39 Comments
1 - 24 of 39
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Now, you could say that about any college option quarterback of the last few decades, regardless of race. But hey, Eric Crouch! We'll give you a Heisman! Who cares that anyone who had ESPN could see that Antwaan Randel El could have run circles around you! You're white!
Report Abuse
It isn't the 1950's anymore.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Games vs. defenses ranked in the top 40 addresses this a bit -- four apiece. Additionally, Tech's Sagarin SOS ranking is 12, whereas Florida's is 54.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
...all of the aforementioned QBs have had a better statistical year than THE CHRISTIAN CHILD.
Plug any of them in at starting QB for the Gators and the ppg shoots up by at least 14
The current Florida ppg of 36.5 is misleading...
the avg vs Troy, FIU and Charleston Southern is 60 (24 TD)
the avg ppg vs formidable foes is 25.2 (21TD)
'Bama will destroy the Gators... and I'm not even a fan of the Tide/Saban
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
they prove to be capable in shootout wins over florida state (no punts!), and grinding out the clock (unc, vt, uva), they're only loss was an early season slugfest against the U who had all summer to prepare
the acc is 2-3 against the sec this year, you gonna shout about bama's win over vt? they were losing late in the fourth quarter to a team chock full of freshman and sophomores from the acc and got lucky on 2 turnovers
they'll be 4-4 after saturday, so much for sec muscle
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
As far as Nesbitt's accuracy, what is the completion percentage for bigger name QBs throwing bombs? Does anyone complete more than 50% of their deep passes?
Against Miss St, who was giving him the underneath pass (by playing a 10-15 yard cushion) he was 11/14. MSU sold out to use 9 against the option and gave big cushions, that Nesbitt took advantage of by throwing quick passes and letting the receivers run with the ball. Most teams play tighter on the WRs and he throws deep balls into on them instead.
Completion percentage doesnt matter. Nor does yards per completion. It is yards per ATTEMPT that is important, it combines the other two. And Nesbitt leads the nation by a huge margin in that category.
In running terms, the comparison would be Barry Sanders. He was the "incompletion" King of running backs, regularly leading the NFL in plays for losses. And yet, when He wasnt held to -1 yard, he went big. Not trying to compare Nesbitt to Sanders in ability, just stylistically (and his passing vs Sanders' running, Nesbitts running style is the anti-Sanders).
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 39