Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:50 am EST
A fellow named Ken Krayeske, a freelance journalist and student at UConn law school, got into Jim Calhoun's postgame press conference after UConn defeated South Florida yesterday. But Ken didn't want to talk basketball, he wanted to talk about Jim Calhoun's salary and how it related to the state of Connecticut's budgetary problems.
Ken got to ask his question, but from there, things didn't go too well for him. Here's the exchange:
And I believe the judges are going to have to score that as a TKO for Mr. Calhoun.
Of course, Ken sees things differently, as you can read about on his website.
I guess it's not a ridiculous question to ask. Sports are, in the grand scheme of things, a trivial and meaningless enterprise, and like the man said, Calhoun is the highest-paid state employee in Connecticut. With Connecticut projected to have a $944 million deficit this year, it's fair to ask him about his huge salary.
And it's fair for Calhoun to respond exactly as he did, too. No one likes to be told they're not worth the money they're making, and I can't imagine that many would respond favorably to the implication that they're being greedy or selfish. There's also the small matter of Calhoun being absolutely right.
The University of Connecticut benefits financially from having a good basketball team. It's Jim Calhoun's job to make sure that happens, and he does this job extremely well. Jim Calhoun makes UConn money. He's not bleeding anyone dry. Quite the opposite, in fact. He pumps money into the university. Believe me, if it wasn't worth it financially for the University of Connecticut to pay Jim Calhoun $1.6 million a year, they wouldn't do it.
If you don't like it, don't blame Calhoun, blame capitalism. That's how it goes. Frivolous things like sports often generate massive revenue, and when they do, someone's going to get paid. In this case, it's Calhoun. He makes a lot because he brings in a lot.
The money generated by the UConn basketball program helps to support a ton of other things at the university, particularly the non-revenue generating sports, like golf, softball, volleyball, rowing, or women's ice hockey. Those things can exist in part because Jim Calhoun does what he does. A "thank you" might be more appropriate than a condescending question.
The Dagger is a college basketball blog edited by Jeff Eisenberg. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
156 Comments
1 - 25 of 156
Report Abuse
Sure, disagree with the reporter's tactics, but the conversation about big time money and college athletics is extremely appropriate in this economic climate.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
If he wanted to make a point he could have offered to take up the discussion later. If he wanted to avoid the question he could have simply said he wasn't discussing it. Instead, he launched on a tirade showing the world he's an overpaid and arrogant boob.
The whole program brings in 12.5 mil... not one man. Just like a Wall Street CEO, he's lost sight of how many good people it takes to get the job done. He earns 1.6 million apparently on luck. He certainly lacks the leadership and communication skills most 20 year olds at the school are required to leave with.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The question we should be asking is; "Why are Connecticut taxpayers being forced to finance law students when lawyers are pretty much the most hated people in the entire world?"
I think it's funny that Krayeske won't allow comments on his own blog. Way to have a backbone, dude.
If the so called "students" of Ken Krayeske's generation would concentrate more on learing a skill that would help them get a job, instead of concentrating on "activism", people who pay taxes, people like Jim Calhoun, wouldn't have to be support all their sorry (profane)s on unemployment.
Get a real job and actually pay some taxes Ken, then you can complain about how poorly their spent.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1. "That's how it goes" is a terrible argument - really, it's not an argument at all, but instead indicates the refusal to argue. To say "that's how it goes" is simply to say that the facts are the way they are, but the activist's purpose was precisely to question whether that's how it SHOULD go. To say that something OUGHT to be the case just because it IS the case is a logical fallacy.
2. ec_anarchy makes a good point: Calhoun doesn't rake in 12 mil by himself; he's a cog in the machine, and at his age, he ought to be self-aware enough to recognize that fact. Replace him with almost any other NCAA division I head coach and it stands to reason that UConn basketball would still rake in the money. It's irrational, therefore, for anyone to suggest that Calhoun deserves his massive salary because of his earning power.
3. Furthermore, as zach p rightly suggests, the money earned by a major university's flagship sports programs doesn't exactly flow directly into scholarships for math students. If UConn is anything like the major universities with which I've been associated, there's the university and then there's the university, if you get my drift: you'll notice Calhoun didn't let us know exactly where that 12 mil goes, but you can bet UConn's athletes won't ever have to go without brand-name, brand-new uniforms, equipment, or facilities.
4. Finally, even if you believe that Calhoun himself is directly responsible for earning 12 million dollars and you believe that the money goes entirely into needy academic and/or social programs, it STILL doesn't follow that Calhoun deserves to make as much money as he does. Why wouldn't 500k/yr. be enough? Why not 100k? Distinguished professors frequently make less than 200k/yr., and it's easily arguable that those professors do more for the futures of their students than does the head basketball coach. My point: even if Calhoun is doing something completely honorable and rewarding for UConn, that fact doesn't entitle him to earn an obscene amount of money, especially during a statewide and nationwide economic crisis.
Thanks for reading!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
If you are one part of a business organization that is profitable but they entire business is faltering, you can still lose employees on your area, have your wages frozen, etc. If the state of Conneticutt is hurting then the pain should be spread around. Afterall thats coach Calhoun's "team."
I am pretty sure that if the state of Conneticutt was looking to save money and decided to do so by eliminating only coach Calhoun's assistants to do so, he would be screaming that its unfair. Yet when other people lose their jobs not related to him he gives the "we bring in more than we take argument." Teachers at the school educate future business leaders and tax payers who will bring in far more than 12 million to Conn yet are not paid nowhere near what he is paid. By that logic shouldnt he get a paycut to pay them more?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
16 Pat Summitt makes 1.125 million a year on an extended 6 year salary. Bruce Pearl get 2.3 million a year until 2014.
Report Abuse
16 Pat Summitt makes 1.125 million a year on an extended 6 year salary. Bruce Pearl get 2.3 million a year until 2014.
Report Abuse
Does anyone really believe UCONN is paying Calhoun that much money because of how much his sport "brings in" to the university OR are they paying him that much because hes had success?? My point is if UCONN had never won a national championship under Calhoun and had never had anything above a .500 season but yet still brought in $12 mil in revenue, does anyone really believe he would be making 1.6 mil a year? Coach Calhoun seems to believe he is paid in direct proportion to how much he brings in for the university. If that were true in a greater sense, then most Div I football coaches would lose their jobs or be paid $0 beacause football is a negative revenue sport at the vast majority of schools. Yet they continue to have programs...hmmm
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
One reason sports journalism is so bad at the national level is that those reporters/bloggers often lack the guts to ask tough questions, and are sycophantic enough to thank athletes and coaches.
Report Abuse
"I'm pretty sure this Ken Krayeske tool is receiving taxpayer funded financial aid to do his little "freelance journalism" stunts while he is supposed to be getting a law degree."
And to echo another person, why not ask the same questions of our congressmen? Ken's questions were out of place. He displayed the biggest ego of anyone, and then also showed false humility in the process, playing the victim and downtrodden one. What a sorry attempt at self-aggrandizement on the side of the reporter.
Report Abuse
Noone is disputing his success. I dont even think too many people would begrudge him a big salary. In relation to other coaches, hes certainly earned it.
The point about athletes making more than him is really not relevant. We arent discussing athlete's salaries but if we were it would be worth pointing out that NONE of his athletes makes anything for helping him make 1.6 mil and 12mil for the university. They do have a shot at a free education which is worth alot but its certainly not worht 12mil dollar for the average college graduate
The real question is whether he should take a paycut given the state's economic crunch. Its a fair question since he does work for the state. For him to get all full of self-righteous idignation is a bit over the top. He could have just answered the question. The question wasnt "Coach do you think you bring in enough money for the state to justify your salary?" The question was should he be concerned with how much hes making given the states budget problems? Its a legitimate question although it was asked in a poor manner
1 - 25 of 156