Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:30 pm EST
On Monday, I mentioned that the Big Ten actually, for once, seemed to have a puncher's chance in the ACC-Big Ten Challenge.
This hinged on teams like Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio State --
teams in the middle class of the Big Ten -- getting their act together
and deciding, like so many swing voters in any given election, the
final result of the proceedings. It also included the possibility that
Purdue was getting Duke at home. That appeared to be a winnable game.
After two nights of the Challenge, that whole Big Ten-maybe-winning-this-year is not looking so good. Not at all.
Minnesota took care of business, but Illinois and Iowa both missed
their down-to-the-wire close opportunities. Purdue, as most everyone
probably saw, did not do so well. (That's what happens when you don't hit threes.)
Like the early returns of a presidential underdog, the Big Ten needed
those early victories to save its optimism. The victories didn't
happen.
So while the contest is currently tied, here's what's in store for the night:
Indiana's hapless (but gutsy!) band of ragtags will be dismembered by
Wake Forest; Penn State will have a similar time at Georgia Tech; and
Northwestern, even at home, will likely lose to FSU. That leaves
Michigan at Maryland, which Michigan could win, but which isn't any
sure thing; and Michigan State hosting North Carolina in Ford Field. An
upset isn't entirely out of the question here but ... actually, yeah,
it kind of is. North Carolina is incredible. And even if it
wasn't, the Big Ten couldn't get back to level without an upset
somewhere else. The whole thing looks pretty questionable.
And so we return to our presidential metaphor: The Big Ten needs some
unlikely wins in some states that typically go the other way. I'm no Nate Silver,
but right now, The Dagger is prepared to project the 2008 ACC-Big Ten
Challenge will be won by ... the ACC. Same as it ever was.
The Dagger is a college basketball blog edited by Jeff Eisenberg. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
4 Comments
1 - 4 of 4
Report Abuse
you'd rather watch hot, ripped guys dunk over each other than watch a team of lesser athletes prevail consistently year after year after year. it's ok to feel that way.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 4 of 4