Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:45 am EDT
Before
even discussing free throws, there are two things I'd like to get out of the
way.
1) It's way too easy to poke fun at Coach Calipari for
comments he made earlier in the season regarding his lack of concern about
Memphis's poor free-throw shooting. I'm not going to add any additional salt
to the wound, even though I once said I would. To quote myself: "Reality
is coming, Coach Calipari. It's coming in the form of a 1-point loss when you
miss 15 free throws. At this point, I'm almost rooting for it."
It's not nearly as much fun as I thought it would be, but more importantly,
criticism of Calipari for poor free throw shooting right now isn't valid, either
(we'll get to that in a second).
2) There are a million "if they just did that," or "if he just
did this" scenarios in this game, but I firmly, firmly, firmly
believe that Kansas won this game, as opposed to Memphis losing it. If Kansas
made no spectacular plays, and Memphis blew it on free throw shooting, that
would be one thing. But Kansas made spectacular plays, one after the other. They
ripped this victory away from Memphis.
That said...
It just sits there on the box score, staring at you. There's no way to make it
go away. Memphis, having struggled with their free-throw shooting all year long,
missed four of their last five free throws in a game that went into overtime.
Let me say this, though. What people talked about during Memphis's previous 39
games was terrible free-throw shooting from Joey Dorsey (37.8%), Antonio
Anderson (57.7%), Andre Allen (43.2%), Willie Kemp (38.3%), and Doneal Mack
(39.0%).
Chris Douglas-Roberts and Derrick Rose were both over 70% on the year (71.1% and
71.4%, respectively).
But those were the guys laying the bricks down the stretch. Douglas-Roberts
missed his last three free throws, and Rose missed one of two. So yes, free
throw shooting did kill Memphis, but it wasn't the same free throw shooting that
people, myself included, harped on all year.
It's not like Calipari had this problem, neglected it, and it cost him. Two
players who didn't have that problem, and who had made game-winning free
throws before, suddenly couldn't hit anything when the game was on the line.
This wasn't an old infection rearing its head at an inopportune time. It was a
brand new infection, from guys who were supposed to be immune.
Prior to that, Memphis had made 11-of-14 from the line, and I was thinking to
myself, as such a fantastic game unfolded, that I was glad it wasn't going to be
decided on something like poor free-throw shooting. And then, quite suddenly, it
became a huge factor.
The Dagger is a college hoops blog edited by Eamonn Brennan. Email him, and follow his Twitter.

RivalsMinute: Cincinnati upsets Maryland
Posted Nov 25 2009
Posted Nov 25 2009
Posted Nov 25 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
7 Comments
1 - 7 of 7
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Another reason, Memphis isn't the champion...not much of regulation time left, Kansas fouls Douglas-Roberts. Douglas-Roberts, apparently mad at himself quote the commentators, slams the ball down on the court and it bounces high into the air. Where's the T? I do think Douglas-Roberts is a great player and he seemed to be one of few on the Memphis team who knew more than "street-ball" and had his head on his shoulders. Regardless that I think he's the most decent player on Memphis - he made an error of judgement and should have taken the consequence for it. When, in college basketball, is any player allowed to slam the ball like that? Kansas should have had foul shots and possession. Simple as that.
I, for one, am SO SICK of the media hating Kansas. Had Kansas won by 30, the headlines would have been, "Memphis Almost Wins". Someone please tell me - what is the problem with the Jayhawks? Other than Illinois fans, who hate them because Self left (which I have to hear about every day, because I chose to live in Illinois)...what is the issue? Kansas has been known for high-class basketball for years!! Maybe that's why - they're good, people know it, and hate them for it.
Kansas WON - they didn't win "fair and square", because there were opportunities and a couple of T's that should have been called on Memphis. (Specifically: Dorsey needs to learn to shut his mouth.) They won despite the odds of 75% of the nation being against them. They came back, stomping all over the #1 team in the nation, PROVING they deserve it. They played a smart game and did what they do best - played basketball! They won....twenty years overdue....'88 and '08. Let them enjoy their EARNED victory!! That said, ROCK CHALK JAYHAWK!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Main reason Memphis lost, Kansas is a better team. Of course that can be debated and I'm sure it will be debated, but the whole point of March Madness in the NCAA realm is for everyone to see who is the better team. You don't win the whole tournament by being lucky. The Jayhawks munched the Tigers for dinner. Clearly. 75-68 - end of argument.
Report Abuse
1 - 7 of 7