Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:40 am EDT

Last week, the world learned of the NCAA's plans in classic Bond-villain strategy: preemptively. But unlike James Bond and his suits and cars and women and gadgets -- Sir Ian Fleming knew how to draw a man-crush of a character, didn't he? -- college basketball fans were powerless to stop it. There was no escaping the NCAA's laser-shark tank, not even with an explosive, martini-pouring pen.
So now we have new rules. Three, in fact. The first: Referees can now look at instant replay to determine flagrant fouls and ejections. Good rule. The second: When a free throw shooter is injured, the opposing coach must now select one of the team's players from the four on court. (Previously, the team's own coach could sub in anyone he wanted.) Another good rule.
The third? Bad rule [the new horrible rule that Eamonn hates]:
Secondary defenders must establish position outside the area between the backboard and the front of the rim to draw a charge call.
Yes, you read that correctly. Last week, the NCAA was going to create a rule that forced referees to determine some sort of imaginary restricted area instead of just painting a semicircle like the NBA. (Why? Because that would take a few years, and they wanted to rush ahead with a rule change now, thanks very much.) That sounded bad enough. Now we know exactly what those referees will be asked to do, and somehow, it's even worse.
Think about it. Block-charge is already nearly impossible to call. Referees, despite our throaty protestations to the contrary, usually do a good job calling it. But now the NCAA is asking them not only to decide correctly between blocks and charges, but also the NCAA wants referees to take into account where the player's feet are -- because that's how you establish position -- in relation to the area between the backboard and the front of the rim. Little, normal-human-sized refs now have to see a 6-foot-8 player's feet, the basket and, oh yeah, whether or not the offensive player was under control, or initiated the contact, or any of the hundreds of other little nuances that make calling blocks and charges incredibly difficult in the first place.
Tremendous rule change! This season is going to be awesome.
The Dagger is a college basketball blog edited by Jeff Eisenberg. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
665 Comments
1 - 25 of 665
Report Abuse
But that rule won't be half the disaster that the block-charge rule is. I like making it so you can't draw a charge by standing directly under the basket, but if there's a specific area in which a charge cannot be called, put a line on the court to mark it. That seems kind of obvious, doesn't it?
Report Abuse
I also agree with SpartanDan that the opposite coach picking the player is a joke. I also like his idea of that person must sit out a certain amount of time if he is that hurt he can't shoot a free throw, maybe even something as drastic as the rest of the half.
You act as if next season is ruined due to these rules, please sir, don't make big deals out of nothing.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
USA!
USA!
USA!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
In regard to the first rule, I agree with SpartanDan. Letting the opposing coach choose who takes the free throw is like a double punishment on the offensive team: not only does the team possibly lose one of their best shooters, but they are repaid for it by having their worst shooter take the free throws.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 665