The Dagger - NCAAB

Last week, the world learned of the NCAA's plans in classic Bond-villain strategy: preemptively. But unlike James Bond and his suits and cars and women and gadgets -- Sir Ian Fleming knew how to draw a man-crush of a character, didn't he? -- college basketball fans were powerless to stop it. There was no escaping the NCAA's laser-shark tank, not even with an explosive, martini-pouring pen.

So now we have new rules. Three, in fact. The first: Referees can now look at instant replay to determine flagrant fouls and ejections. Good rule. The second: When a free throw shooter is injured, the opposing coach must now select one of the team's players from the four on court. (Previously, the team's own coach could sub in anyone he wanted.) Another good rule.

The third? Bad rule [the new horrible rule that Eamonn hates]:

Secondary defenders must establish position outside the area between the backboard and the front of the rim to draw a charge call.

Yes, you read that correctly. Last week, the NCAA was going to create a rule that forced referees to determine some sort of imaginary restricted area instead of just painting a semicircle like the NBA. (Why? Because that would take a few years, and they wanted to rush ahead with a rule change now, thanks very much.) That sounded bad enough. Now we know exactly what those referees will be asked to do, and somehow, it's even worse.

Think about it. Block-charge is already nearly impossible to call. Referees, despite our throaty protestations to the contrary, usually do a good job calling it. But now the NCAA is asking them not only to decide correctly between blocks and charges, but also the NCAA wants referees to take into account where the player's feet are -- because that's how you establish position -- in relation to the area between the backboard and the front of the rim. Little, normal-human-sized refs now have to see a 6-foot-8 player's feet, the basket and, oh yeah, whether or not the offensive player was under control, or initiated the contact, or any of the hundreds of other little nuances that make calling blocks and charges incredibly difficult in the first place.

Tremendous rule change! This season is going to be awesome.

digg delicious
more

665 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. SpartanDan
    1. Posted by SpartanDan Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I don't like the free throw rule either - if you hack someone hard enough that they can't shoot their free throws, why should you get rewarded by picking the worst shooter on the floor? Leave the decision with the coach of the injured player, and if you're really worried about someone faking it, put in a rule that a player substituted for in such a situation cannot return to the game for some period of time.
    But that rule won't be half the disaster that the block-charge rule is. I like making it so you can't draw a charge by standing directly under the basket, but if there's a specific area in which a charge cannot be called, put a line on the court to mark it. That seems kind of obvious, doesn't it?
  2. jarred
    2. Posted by jarred Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:31 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Have you ever played or reffed organized basketball Eamonn? I'm doubting it. I've done both and I completely agree with the new charge rule. I like the idea of not having a line to call the charge also. The block/charge will ALWAYS be a judgement call and a ref can tell if that man is too far under the basket, thus making it a blocking charge. They have been leaning towards this rule even without the official rule change. I'm glad something has finally been made official. Quit whining because it really won't have any effect on the game besides cleaning up cheap charges.
    I also agree with SpartanDan that the opposite coach picking the player is a joke. I also like his idea of that person must sit out a certain amount of time if he is that hurt he can't shoot a free throw, maybe even something as drastic as the rest of the half.
    You act as if next season is ruined due to these rules, please sir, don't make big deals out of nothing.
  3. Rob D
    3. Posted by Rob D Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The third rule is horrible... Charges would be called based on the opinions of DUMB refs... How would players know where to stand?
  4. Eric Z
    4. Posted by Eric Z Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Agreed the free throw rule is terrible. You should not be rewarded with fouling. It made no comments about free throws and flagrant foul. so if for example i punch steve nash in the face, and he cant shoot. why in the world should my team be able to select shaq to shoot his free throws. just put in a system if you cant shoot ur shoots you must sit for 6 minutes.
  5. e3_e3
    5. Posted by e3_e3 Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i've only played jungle ball. i wouldn't know about these things you call 'rules'.
  6. Nick M
    6. Posted by Nick M Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Horrible
  7. bam bam
    7. Posted by bam bam Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    blogger
  8. Michael T
    8. Posted by Michael T Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This is craziness. I don't like it at all, its already hard enough to get a charging call don't make it even harder.
  9. Ref-n-Rhino
    9. Posted by Ref-n-Rhino Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ever notice how they can't go one year without changing something? the rules committe wouldn't feel like they did their job if something wasn't changed. College is getting closer to the NBA in rules, as is the HS getting closer to the college rules. Happens to a small degree each season. I really odn't have too big a problem with any of the three. I officiate HS & college and will adjust just like I have in years past.
  10. Tom H
    10. Posted by Tom H Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:57 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Sounds a bit weird.
    USA!
    USA!
    USA!
  11. Robert J
    11. Posted by Robert J Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:57 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Spartan, they do...That's exactly what the story says. The difference between then and now is that the coach of the injured player could pick anybody (including those on the bench) to take the shots, now he has to choose someone already on the floor....
  12. Greg
    12. Posted by Greg Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Did you suck at playing Dungeons and Dragons then decide to blog? No one cares what you think and no one cares about this rule. Fail. Fail. Good try though. Go outside and get some sunshine.
  13. Robert J
    13. Posted by Robert J Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    At least that's what I'm guessing, otherwise, yes, horrible rule...
  14. bleediots
    14. Posted by bleediots Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #2 you're dumb you think because you've reffed a game that you know better than a person paid by an internet corporation to blog about these things? why aren't you reffing ncaa games right now? quit hating and people and their OPINIONS
  15. Dane T
    15. Posted by Dane T Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The third rule is a good rule. Ive always thought it should be that way, actually that it was already being called that way without the rule in place. You should not be able to take a charge from under or behind the basket. Chances are if you are there, you are going to be in position late anyway. You shouldnt get rewarded for getting late position under the basket
  16. ?
    16. Posted by ? Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    this is a very dumb rule to post . the first two are good and nice for the game.
  17. JeffS
    17. Posted by JeffS Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Stop being lazy and use some of that tremendous income you make ( note that the players receive zero salaries) from these games and paint a circle on the key. It saddens me that we in the U.S. have left our roots of the fifties' and have become so lazy. That will be our downfall.
  18. 1rishHeart
    18. Posted by 1rishHeart Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    who cares - it is a stupid game played by overdramatic crybaby's who grope each other - and then cry about it when they dont get their way. sad thing is , they behaive the same on and off the court - thewy ahould get real jobs and see what life is really like for the majority of people in the world
  19. John P
    19. Posted by John P Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ok, I am NOT Ed Hightower or Ray Perone, and I only call High School Games so this is OUT OF MY LEAGUE. HOWEVER, any time you throw a rules question out I like to respond. I am okay with the charge call. But he hack atack I like the old way better. Yes, I have seen a kid fake for the benefit but 90% of the time the kid should not have commited the foul.
  20. Matthew
    20. Posted by Matthew Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Rediculous!! as long as your feet are set...charge...no excpetions, no thinking about it, no deliberating, no question!!! ncaa and nba are insane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! referees are bad enough, now they will be worse....what a load of crap!!!
  21. joseph
    21. Posted by joseph Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i do not know who this you is that wrote the article but they are all bad. intsant replay slows down the game, and its the teams fault to flow and injury a player so they shouls face the absoult best shooter as punishment. and yes intrepation rules are alway bad
  22. Sarah
    22. Posted by Sarah Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    go bucks!
  23. Luke N
    23. Posted by Luke N Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I have played and reffed basketball too, and I would say that's a pretty bad rule. Any rule that requires a judgment call from the ref is usually a bad thing, especially something as debatable as block-charge. Making the ref call it based on whether or not the defending player is within an area that is not marked and is defined by objects above the players heads just seems counter-intuitive to the main job of the ref, which is to keep the players safe, and this can only be done if you're looking at the players.
    In regard to the first rule, I agree with SpartanDan. Letting the opposing coach choose who takes the free throw is like a double punishment on the offensive team: not only does the team possibly lose one of their best shooters, but they are repaid for it by having their worst shooter take the free throws.
  24. StevenM
    24. Posted by StevenM Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    the free throw rule is not a good rule. if one of the players on the other team injures them, then the opposing coach get's to choose the worst free throw shooter. that's a win-win for the opponent. coaches might as well send in a backup player and injure their best player so then they choose their worst player to shoot the free throws.
  25. FATJOEY
    25. Posted by FATJOEY Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Do away with offensive goal tending too! its a joke!

The Dagger

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Jeff Eisenberg

The Dagger is a college basketball blog edited by Jeff Eisenberg. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Contributors:
Chris Chase, Matt Norlander,

Related Photo Gallery

Featured NCAAB Video

Y! Sports Blogs

The Dagger Recent Readers