Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:02 pm EDT

Basketball Prospectus' John Gasaway couldn't have described the reaction to the Wall story any better yesterday:
Assuming no new facts come to light, the story was an excellent example of the “WHAT?!…Oh, is that all?” reaction that news professionals now refer to as the balloon boy sequence: shock and fright followed by a shrug.
Most of us were shrugging within fifteen minutes of reading the whole story yesterday, but there are probably some -- I'm betting they're Indiana and Louisville and Memphis fans, most of them -- who are hoping the John Wall thing turns into a crippling mess for Kentucky basketball. A day later, that seems less and less likely. From Jeff Goodman:
Sources close to the situation have told FOXSports.com that Wall will likely be cleared prior to Kentucky’s season-opener – which is on Nov. 13 against Morehead State at Rupp Arena.
Ahh. You feel that? It's shoulder-shrugging time. Work the kinks out. Really get in there. Make this the best part of your day. Because here's the thing: Even if Wall isn't cleared, the three or four games he'd likely miss as punishment would be all of Kentucky's early-season cupcakes. Every team has them. And when you're as talented as UK, you can lose your best player for four games early in the year and still not even break a sweat. This little AAU oversight, whether sinister or not, isn't going to matter much in the 2009-10 college basketball season. Kentucky fans can take deep breaths; those eager for Calipari to fall from his occasionally skeevy pedestal will have to practice a little more patience.
And that's the consensus among the pundits (I love using the word "pundits" for "writers and bloggers"; it adds a bit of Anglo flair to the proceedings, doesn't it?) today as well. Had Calipari stayed at Memphis, Wall might never have seen the floor. But since Wall is at Kentucky and Calipari is scot-free, the punishment won't be all that strict, nor will Calipari's name get dragged through the mud. Or, if it does, it shouldn't. At least not this time.
The Dagger is a college basketball blog edited by Jeff Eisenberg. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
23 Comments
1 - 23 of 23
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Kentucky LOST the title game in 97, maybe the 96, or 98 team? The title of the blog is "Much ado about nothing", until this freshman class Wins some games, SEC titles, and tournament games all the hype and attention is
Much ado about Nothing!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Go 'Cats!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I really dont get where all the UK hate comes from. I dont like Duke, UNC, or Kansas. But I dont spend my time getting all worked up about them. They are still 3 of the best programs in b ball. Good for them and anyone else that does well. I wonder, if and when we win a title, and it doesnt get taken away, Cal gets in good kids that stick around more than a year, and we are constantly in the top 5, will all of the haters get back on here and say "our bad. we were wrong? of course not. because it takes a big bad man to anonimously bad talk things. Only insecure people hate something that doesnt directly involve them. "Oh no, another team is good, I better talk bad about them" Grow up people.
Report Abuse
Wall: STILL NOT CLEARED, Still hasn't played a game. Relax and wait, maybe great maybe not. Time will tell, and Yahoo Blogger's don't know. I can name a dozen McDonald's AA recruits who did NOTHING in college.
See You in March!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Please re-read my post. I stated "most talented" UK team, which doesn't necessarily mean a team that won the NCAA Championship. Anyone that has a real understanding of UK basketball knows that the 1996 and 1997 Pitino teams had more talent than the 1998 team, even though the 1996 and 98 teams won the championships. The 97 team lost a heartbreaker in the final to a loaded Arizona team in overtime, while sitting Derek Anderson (who spent a decade in the NBA) to avoid risking an injury to his knee and preserving his pro career. While the 97 team featured a loaded line up of Ron Mercer, Derek Anderson, Jamal Magloire, Nazr Mohammed, Scott Padgett and Wayne Turner, the 98 team was without Mercer and Anderson leaving a lack of talent in our backcourt. At any rate, the 2009-2010 Cats look every bit as loaded as the mid-late 90's teams and I don't know if we've ever had PGs like Wall or Bledsoe.
Report Abuse
Cudo's on your 97 comment. Wall still hasn't done anything for UK, let's grade his college career when it's over.
Report Abuse
Kentucky fans, you had a good program and have sold your souls. Welcome to the era of Calicheesy, controversy, and scandals.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 23 of 23