Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:09 pm EST
A-. Let me tell you why.
ESPN has plenty of irritating programming, and plenty of irritating
employees. For whatever reason, with the exception of Ron Jaworski and
Tom Jackson, the network can't find an NFL analyst that isn't either a
mouthbreathing Ditka type (like, say, Mike Ditka himself) or someone
whose main form of analysis is yelling and then laughing and then yelling
again (hi, Keyshawn). Chris Berman remains detestable. And so on.
But for all of the network's issues elsewhere, their college basketball
team is always on point. Rece Davis is perfect as the steady Chris
Fowler type; Hubert Davis is good; Digger Phelps' tielighter is just
strange, and he has his blind spots, but he's usually OK; and Bob
Knight is the analytical steal of the year. It's impossible to listen
to Knight and not learn something, anything, about the game of
basketball. The in-game play-by-play guys are typically good, too,
especially Dan Shulman. All in all, ESPN's talent and production on
college basketball is excellent. It's one of the network's strengths.
Which, of course, brings us to Dick Vitale.
Vitale is the face of ESPN basketball, and few announcers have been as
hotly debated in recent years. Some love him. Some hate him. Some think
he's essential to college basketball, and some think his screams must
ring over the public address system in Hell. Anyway, that was last
year's debate. This year? After one night, it's safe to say Vitale has
crossed the line from endearingly annoying to just plain insufferable.
Tuesday night's North Carolina-Kentucky game was Vitale's first of the
year on ESPN. Last year, the worst part about Vitale's broadcasts were
his bandwagons. No matter what the instance, no matter who was playing,
Vitale would find a way to mention Tyler Hansbrough's player of the
year campaign. That was one. Another was his ardent belief that he
needs to moderate the standing Indiana-Bob Knight fued by screaming,
whenever appropriate, that Indiana University should rename Assembly
Hall "Robert Montgomery Knight Hall." Tuesday night, Vitale proved he
didn't leave those bandwagons behind. (He also has a new one, which I
heard him mention at least twice, something about the one-and-done rule
and how kids should have to go to college for three years.) Vitale seems less interested now in calling games than in using his two hours on ESPN as a bully pulpit for his pet causes. I doubt many fans are interested.
Anyway, after UNC had sufficiently pulled away from Kentucky, I
switched to the Davidson-Oklahoma game, and it was like this auditory
crush had been lifted off my chest. I could just enjoy basketball. I
didn't need to have someone screaming at me to just ... enjoy
basketball.
That's where we are with Vitale right now. The man who helped
popularize college basketball on ESPN is now the sport's biggest sore
spot. He doesn't just annoy anymore. He actually makes it a challenge
to watch. (It wasn't always like this. Check out ESPN Classic. Vitale used to actually be informative.)
So, ESPN gets an A-. As entrenched as Vitale is, I doubt we'll see an A anytime soon.
(UPDATE: Thanks to last year's throat surgery, Vitale is resting his vocal chords this year when he's off camera. Of course. He can't rest them on camera. That would be too much to ask.)
The Dagger is a college basketball blog edited by Jeff Eisenberg. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Posted Jan 28 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
105 Comments
1 - 24 of 105
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Dickie-V is great for pre-and post game analysis with plenty of insight to offer and knack for hyping up games that you may not know the importance of prior to him telling you
But having him in the booth, especially for a game that will more than likely get out of hand, is just....wrong.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Love: his knowledge of basketball, his passion, energy.
Hate: his voice.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
My personal favorite is the fact that at least once a game he goes on a rant about some school which always ends up with him strenuously praising/defending the school's athletic director as if there were some debate raging through the sports world about that particular athletic director. "ROBERT JOHNSON IS ONE OF THE FINEST ATHLETIC DIRECTORS IN THE COUNTY. HE IS DOING A PHENOMENAL JOB THERE AT (some university NOT playing in tonight's game). ABSOLUTELY PHENOMENAL. HE'S AWESOME WITH A CAPITAL "A"
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And it's spread to the other ESPN Channels. ESPN Classic used to show like, um, games, like college football and World Seies, you know, classics. Now they show poker and American Gladiators.
Dickie V used to be a cute novelty, like your drunken uncle. Somewhere along the way he morphed into a minor celebrity, list-maker, microphone bully, corporate shill.
I watched the Davidson/Oklahoma game from start to finish. Two great players spoke louder than any broadcaster ever will. I don't even know who the announcers were. That's how it's supposed to be.
P.S. MJD...The Knight-Indiana fued is really the Knight-Indiana feud. It's kind hard to rip someone when you slip up yourself.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Okay, he yells in the booth and has all the tired cliches that he's been using for years. And, yes, he probably strays too much into the politics of sport. But he displays something that so few others do today -- an unbridled love for the game and an enthusiasm that defies age.
Give the guy credit for who he was and who he is as a man. He was a schoolteacher, has been married for some 35 years, raised kids, helped increase awareness of the college game, helps people, and has fun.
What I'll bet he doesn't do is jump on a Web site and write disparaging comments about others.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Jaws sucks... he was not that great of a QB when he played.....Now he acts like he is a HOF
How do you figure? The only time his playing career is brought about is to make references to how the QB is reading the defense or if someone else mentions that he was great. And he usually laughs and changes the subject. Jaws is anything but cocky. He's easily the best, most informed ESPN analyst.
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 105